RadTrad Thomist

For Professional Linguists' Translation of this Video Click Below. https://sisterlucytruth.org/irma-lucia-video-translations/

 

  https://gloria.tv/post/Uta1T7rBStnD1HugxbZYgpJvk

  https://notthebee.com/article/pope-francis-is-going-to-straight-up-pray-at-an-ancient-pagan-temple

  https://novusordowatch.org/?s=mafia+2019 Yep, looks plausible to me! If we are ever going to find out who was "outside the door" at the Carmelite Convent at Coimbra in, say, 1959, when they "disappeared" Sister Lucy, please help us: sisterlucytruth.org/donate

Here is the text describing the discussion of Fr. Thomas McGlynn, O.P. to the Patriarch of Lisbon in 1947 in Fr. McGlynn's book, Vision of Fatima  (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1948), pp. 29-30.  "The important address of Pope Pius XII to the Portuguese people made in Portuguese on October 31, 1942, in connection with the ceremonies of the Silver Jubilee of the apparitions at Fatima [how different from the ceremony of the Golden Jubilee with Paul VI and the fake "Sister Lucy"] was evidently, His Eminence pointed out, a consequence of Lucy's own request made to the Holy Father, of which the Cardinal had knowledge. Lucy had said that the Blessed Virgin wanted the world consecrated to her Immaculate Heart with special mention to be made of Russia. She had declared the special grace to be granted in reward for this consecration would be the shortening of the war, and that, if the Holy Father wished to see an example of the blessings which this would bring to th

Sola Ex Cathedra  is every bit as much a heresy as  Sola Scriptura   1.)      Sola Ex Cathedra  (Popes are only infallible when making   an ex cathedra definition) is a heresy of semi-Trads.   2.)      Sola Scriptura (only the Bible is infallible) is a heresy of Protestants.     If the Popes could at times teach heresy, how would we know when they are teaching truth or error?  We would have to be the superior of the Pope to decide when he is teaching the truth and when he is teaching falsehood… that is a complete prideful delusion!        OBJECTION # 1: Vatican I said the Pope is only infallible when speaking Ex Cathedra       ANSWER # 1:  While it is true that Ex Cathedra statements are infallible; it is absolutely NOT true that Ex Cathedra statements are the ONLY times Popes are infallible. Vatican I infallibly declares:     The First Vatican Council        Dogmatic Constitution of Vatican I, Pastor Aeternus          Pope Pius IX, July 18, 1870 A.D.                 “Indeed, their apo

Dear Sir,  I have been aware of the claim that Paul VI was replaced for 37 years now. I don't find it plausible. First, the pictures do not look any different to me and I have never heard that the pictures were ever submitted to current facial recognition technology. I also do not believe it is plausible since Montini was the same in his attitude and his Modernist teaching throughout his life. There is never a change in his attitude or support for the Modernist Revolution. With the Sister Lucy case the technological analysis and the handwriting analysis, not to mention the radical change of character and outlook point to the clear conclusion that these two woman, who are not like each other at all, cannot be the same person. Also, it is impossible to believe that a man operating for years at the Vatican and in Milan and on the world stage could be replaced by another in an instant, while switching out a contemplative nun who for decades rarely appeared in public, is perfectly plaus

"Said more simply, the chins of A and B have a drastically different shape. This drastic difference in the mandible area shows these cannot be the same individual. There is no plastic surgery that would make A's chin look like B's chin."  ---- Lois Gibson, World Record Holding Forensic Artist and Dentist.  

  “In the face of all this, Jesus announces to us that God is not an idea or an abstract doctrine, but God is the One who ‘contaminates’ himself with our human woundedness and is not afraid to come into contact with our wounds.” He continued: “‘But, Father, what are you saying? That God contaminates himself?’ I am not saying this, St. Paul said it: he made himself to be sin. He who was not a sinner, who could not sin, made himself to be sin. Look at how God contaminated himself to draw near to us, to have compassion and to make us understand his tenderness. Closeness, compassion, and tenderness.”

  Pope Pius XII,  Mystici Corporis Christi , June 29, 1943:      22. Actually  only those are to be included as members of the Church who have been  baptized and profess  the true faith,  and who have not been so unfortunate as to  separate themselves from the unity of the Body,  or been excluded by legitimate authority for grave faults committed. “For in one spirit” says the Apostle, “were we all baptized into one Body, whether Jews or Gentiles, whether bond or free.”  17  As therefore in the true Christian community there is only one Body, one Spirit, one Lord, and one Baptism, so there can be only one faith.  18   And therefore if a man refuse to hear the Church let him be considered — so the Lord commands — as a heathen and a publican .  19  It follows that those are divided in faith or government cannot be living in the unity of such a Body, nor can they be living the life of its one Divine Spirit.      23.  For not every offense, however grave it may be, is such as  of its own na

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/mike-pence-nuclear-football-capitol-riots-impeachment-b1801275.html

https://akacatholic.com/heresy-of-conciliarlism-kramer/ The second is the heretical belief that a true and valid pope who falls into formal heresy would continue in his office and remain in possession of the Petrine  munus  until he is  judged by the Church  to be a heretic ; and only then he would either fall from office, or would have to be deposed by the authority of the Church. It is properly a heresy because it was solemnly defined at Vatican I that there exists only one  total fullness of supreme power  (totam plenitudinem huius supremae potestatis), which is  universal —  over the entire world, which consists in the Roman Pontiff’s  universal primacy of jurisdiction  over the entire  oecumene  (οἰκουμένη = the entire inhabited world); for which reason, there exists only one  supreme  ecumenical authority  over the Church which subsists entirely in the  “full and absolute jurisdiction”   (Pius XII,  Vacantis Apostolicæ Sedis ) of the pope — which therefore in strict logic categor

https://akacatholic.com/heresy-of-conciliarlism-kramer/ "Those who argue that a true pope can fall into heresy as a private person but not as pope, and that he while still pope can be judged by a council, destroy their own argument; because as pope he cannot err in his judgment, and it pertains to his authority to pronounce that infallible judgment with finality. If a validly reigning pontiff could be judged by a council for heresy, the divinely instituted supreme authority of the ecclesiastical monarchy would be subverted and destroyed by being made ultimately subject to the aristocratic authority of the bishops assembled in a council — an aristocratic authority which would be the worst possible for the Church, as St. Robert Bellarmine explains: Democracy is the absolutely worst governance : nevertheless aristocracy is seen to be more pernicious for the Church . Indeed the supreme evil for the Church is heresy : heresy is stirred up by higher-ups rather than by common men. Certai

  https://akacatholic.com/heresy-of-conciliarlism-kramer/ "Unlike the extraordinary apostolic power common to all the Apostles which was not passed on to the bishops, the Primacy St. Peter received from Christ was ordinary, and is passed on to Peter’s successors who receive it directly from Christ, whereas the episcopal jurisdiction which is not conferred immediately by Christ on the bishops, but is  received mediately, and in hierarchical subordination to the pope, and is juridically derived from and dependent on the pope’s full and supreme jurisdiction."

https://www.unionleader.com/news/religion/vatican-rejects-slaves-of-the-immaculate-heart-of-mary-appeal/article_cf5ffceb-47de-5f9f-8098-aa6e3ffa2e26.html

Dr. Chojnowski: This demand that those who identify as "Catholic" accept Vatican II TEACHING as the post-Vatican II "Magisterium" accepts and teaches it, has been a consistent claim and demand since 1966 when Paul VI first stated it after he closed Vatican II on December 8, 1965.  https://www.reddit.com/r/SecondVaticanCouncil/comments/as0kuw/general_audience_of_pope_paul_vi_january_12_1966/ "There are those who ask themselves what the authority, the theological qualification, that the Council wanted to attribute to its teachings, knowing that it has avoided giving solemn dogmatic definitions, committing the infallibility of the ecclesiastical magisterium. And the answer is known to those who remember the conciliar declaration of 6 March 1964, repeated on 16 November 1964: given the pastoral character of the Council, it avoided pronouncing in an extraordinary way dogmas endowed with the note of infallibility; but it has nevertheless furnished its teachings with

  Dr. Chojnowski: In a chapter strangely entitled, "Graces for Pope Paul," Mark Fellows, in Fatima in Twilight , emphasizes the tenacity by which Paul VI drove to all of its bitter conclusions the Modernism that he had learned from such characters as Henri de Lubac. And de Lubac knew it. Fellows quotes de Lubac as stating about Paul VI, "With a stubborn and methodical firmness...he steers the barque (p. 197) From Montini's good friend Jean Guitton, we hear, "The Pope, in my presence, praises today's theologians to the skies. He quotes Manaranche, de Lubac; whom he considers the very best; also citing Congar, Rahner, etc." This was articulated by Guitton in 1974.   One can only believe, since this is the force of the basic facts, that Paul VI was only lamenting the fact that so many, by 1971, were departing from his utopian humanistic New Theology in ways that were not to his liking; they did or said things --- whether left of right -- that did not accor