RadTrad Thomist

  Must be the reason why Cardinal Ciappi said that the Third Secret was about, "the apostasy in the Church will begin at the VERY TOP." Obviously one or two steps down did not have "clearance" to know about the Fatima Fraud. See link to Chiesa Viva article below.  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nzOsFD_myU7H5biPLMMb_7ygNX3H25AF/view?usp=sharing Among the sensitive issues assigned to him by  Card. Ottaviani,  was a meeting with Lucia of Fatima. One day  Cardinal Ottaviani  told Fr. Villa:  «I think I will send you to Fatima to speak directly with Sister Lucia.» He accepted with joy. A business man  from Padua joined him,  Mr. Pagnossin,  a convert of Padre Pio, who offered to pay for the trip and the stay in Portugal.  Cardinal Ottaviani  had provided him with a personal letter, signed by him, as  Prefect of the Holy Office.  This was to be delivered to the Bishop of Coimbra, to allow him to arrange a meeting with Sis...

                          Another case of Pre-Mature Adjudication. From John Salza to a friend,  See the email below regarding Chojnowski's so-called proof. His forensic expert actually concludes that the two people little Petey claims are two Lucias are actually the same person (see claim III). Needless to say, such a report not only proves nothing, but it contradicts the fake Lucia theory.  Dr. Chojnowski: Since I do not want to be sued for releasing more of Salza's correspondence, I will just publish our response to this claim of both John Salza and Robert Siscoe. This is a cumulative case that draws upon three sources of evidence: historical, photographic, and handwriting. Spend some time on the website ( sisterlucytruth.org ) reviewing the eight (8)  different  expert reports and consider the implications of the iProbe report in more detail. We have more to release as well.  Fac...

Dr. Chojnowski: Here is my response to Tradicat who put up an article on "Traditional Catholicism and Conspiracies." The link gets you to the article ---- does any one know who this is --- and my response to the article is below. https://tradicat.blogspot.com/2018/12/conspiracy-theories-and-traditional.html Have you actually looked at the evidence? Does evidence matter or are you so politically correct in your mindset that any thing labeled "conspiracy theory" is automatically rejected by you? Other than DNA, photographic AND written evidence is the only evidence that we can have for now. If the Vatican will allow us to get DNA information than that will help in the process of determining if there were two woman or only one. I did not hire experts to "prove my thesis." I don't have any idea where you came up with that. I certainly never told you "my thesis." I had not thesis before the tests came in except for a belief that there seemed to be...

  A recently received email from Dr. Franco Adesso concerning the encounter, or non-encounter, between Fr. Luigi Villa and Sister Lucy II in 1973 at Fatima:  Dear Elio, In Father Luigi Villa's visit to Fatima, there is to say that Paul VI, never allowed Fr. Villa to talk with Lucia and the only thing he allowed him was to attend a Mass where Lucia was present, but very far away from Fr. Villa. So, he could not find anything about the replacement of Sister Lucia. In Jesus and Mary Franco A.

https://novusordowatch.org/2020/09/fssp-sacrilegious-lick-off-communion-germany/

 

  http://radtradthomist.chojnowski.me/2020/09/declassified-document-from-oss.html

  https://youtu.be/u3ZmPlfowAw

  If you are interested and qualify, please contact us at: justicepc@yahoo.com . 

http://www.todayscatholicworld.com/dec05tcw.htm#montini What would such a man think about a woman calling for the conversion of Russia? Is it at all coincidental that it was Montini who organized Sister Lucy's entrance into the Carmel in Coimbra? Or that he was the one who first trotted out the Imposter to act as his facilitator  on May 13th, 1967?  Angelo Roncalli and Giovanni Montini are the two main person's of interest in the Crime Against Sister Lucy of Fatima, since they were the one's who presided over the entire substitution. John Paul II is a coconspirator, because he used the substitution to advance his own narcissistic personality and policy --- becoming ultimately focal point of the "Third Secret." This parallels perfectly the situation in the Church at large, where Roncalli and Montini initiated and pulled off the substitution of the Conciliar Church for the Catholic Church, and Wojtyla was the one who revived public interes...

Please, when you watch this video, put in the comments section, sisterlucytruth.org

Dr. Chojnowski: This is a fantastic talk, that   can serve as the geo-political, social, and ecclesiastical background of the Sister Lucy Truth Investigation. The United States needed new Catholic doctrine and a new Catholic attitude to incorporate the Catholic Church into Imperial Americanism. It did that with Dignitatis Humanae in 1965. The only part that I cannot agree with, and in a way undercuts his entire argument, is when he takes the Chris Ferrara Memorial Off Ramp in saying that the "Church" did not "really" "change the doctrine" at Vatican II. Archbishop Lefebvre, Cardinal Ratzinger who said that it was a "counter-syllabus that embraced the values of the French Revolution, and any one who reads the text which says that the State is incompetent to make a decision as to the true religion and that every one has a natural human right to practice the religion of his choice in the public and private sphere. We need to get Mr. Wemhoff on board ...

https://isoc.ws

  http://radtradthomist.chojnowski.me/2018/03/was-opus-dei-in-charge-of-sister-lucy.html sisterlucytruth.org