"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?
Here are the list of the 53 Cardinals who met in Rome for the Conclave in Rome in October 1958. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_electors_for_the_1958_papal_conclave Dr. Chojnowski: This telegraph from Ambassador Zellerbach (US ambassador to Italy) and the Secretary of State of the United States under the Eisenhower administration, John Foster Dulles is a clear path mark indicating to us what we should be looking for as regards the happenings in the 1958 papal conclave that met from October 25-28, exactly 2 weeks after this telegram to the US Secretary of State was written and sent. What do we read in this telegram and why does it matter in our investigation into the fate of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima? We do not, as of yet, have a smoking gun telegram, but this one is clearly a picture of a double-barrel shot gun loaded, locked, safety off, aimed, and finger on the trigger communication. The US government seems an imminent "threat" and it is...
What sort of lawyers could be hired to bring charges, at least for crimes committed or abetted outside the sovereignty of Vatican City.
ReplyDeleteI would be willing to make monthly payments toward such a case, as would others here.
Saw the Fatima movie yesterday. Nothing in it really disturbed my Catholic sense, although it certainly was not a 'Catholic movie'. It was not quite a parody of Fatima but the movie certainly would defuse any zeal for the words of the BVM. Some of it was historically inaccurate to the point of absurdity. The near comical interviews with the supposed elder Sr. Lucy and the failure to even mention freemasonry seems suspect. If I were to produce a film that would turn one of the most important historical events in history (if you except Fatima) into a quaint story of some innocent children creating a hysteria in a backward ignorant European village this would be it. Further if I sought to discredit any supernatural events that had occurred and wanted to discredit any authority on the matter and put to rest the whole thing, this too would be it. I think it would be impossible to deny that this movie could be the perfect 'anti - authentic Fatima message - propaganda hit piece'
ReplyDeleteAnd then - we have Sister Lucy Truth.
I watched the credits at the end and there was really nothing of note that indicated that the movie was supported, sanctioned or underwritten by any formal Catholic group, order or organization. (although I may have missed it) It is almost as though the producers consciously looked to distance themselves from any formal or 'traceable' direct financial support. I know a little about movie production and investments that support independent and small studio productions. If Opus Dei put out a note for cooperators to financially support this film, they could have easily raised enough for the production.
The timing of the film juxtaposed with the great work being done to achieve Justice for the true dear Lucy seems too coincidental. Finding a link between Opus Dei and this film would likely further this great two-lucy cause.
PS. I saw a reference as some point that the name that Lucy was given by her order
was "Maria of sorrows" . Could that be confirmed? and indicate if that was as a Dorothean or later as a Carmelite (or the suspected Opus Dei simulated Carmelite convent)
Thanks for all you do!