Belloc's Russian Commentary Exactly 100 Years Ago. Think about the Half Century Antagonism Between the Trotskyites and Russia and then Think About the Same Antagonism between Russia and the Neo-Conservatives of Left (CNN and MSNBC) and Right (Fox News, except for Tucker Carlson.)


Hilaire Belloc, The Jews (1922). 100 years ago. Here is what he says in Chapter 9. Any relevance for today?

The external political power of what was once the Russian Empire has disappeared. The Jews have killed it. But the great mass of Russian humanity remains strongly affected by this curious change. Where popular instinct works untrammelled the old and violent passionate antagonism between the Russian and the Jew survives. You see it in the hotch potch of the Ukraine, the inhabitants of which, in spite of all theories, are of Russian race and tradition, and the central town of which is the sacred region of Russia as a member of Christendom. There, for all the Jewish Committees with large towns under their complete control, there have been repeated revolts. But in the greater part of European Russia at least, and in much of what was once the Asiatic Empire, the Jews hold what is left of the Executive government.


Comments

  1. Belloc has often been slandered as being "anti-Semitic," but as he says in the same book, one doesn't need to do very much all to be smeared with that irrationally weaponized epithet:

    "If a man alluded to the presence of a Jewish financial power in any region...he was an Anti-Semite. If he interested himself in the peculiar character of Jewish philosophical discussions, especially in matters concerning religion, he was an Anti- Semite. If the emigrations of the Jewish masses from country to country, the vast modern invasion of the United States, for instance (which has been organized and controlled like an army on the march), interested him as an historian, he could not speak of it under pain of being called an Anti-Semite. If he exposed a financial swindler who happened to be a Jew, he was an Anti-Semite. If he exposed a group of Parliamentarians taking money from the Jews, he was an Anti-Semite. If he did no more than call a Jew a Jew, he was an Anti-Semite." (The Jews, 1922, 160-161)

    By the way, Belloc loved the Jews and even had a Jewish secretary for many years.

    ReplyDelete
  2. can anyone expand further what the writings mean?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For one thing, Jews, although a very small minority of the population in Russia at the time of the 1917 Revolution, succeeded on account of the revolutionaries being enormously funded and armed by very rich Jews in the US and Europe, by their murderous terror tactics, and the fact that the average Russian was forbidden to possess guns to defend themselves.

      Delete
  3. So were the Russian Jews back then mainly Freemason/Communists? Stalin wasn't a Jew and same as Lenin.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bolshevik Jews murdered the last imperial Russian family.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?

Tragic Disappearance of the Real Sister Lucy dos Santos Foretold to Jacinta, Right Before She Died, by the Blessed Virgin Mary. Contrary to being Safely Stowed in a Convent, Sister Lucy's Life was Always Under Threat.

The Shepherd is Struck and the Sheep Run Towards the Wolf's Lair? Is the Report About the Defection of the General Bursar of the SSPX, Fr. Suarez, True? Does Any One Have More Information About this Report? They Sent a Limousine For Archbishop Lefebvre and He DID NOT Get In. Was a Phone Call From Francis All that Was Necessary?