Proof that our Experts knew about the dentures. In fact these facts help to demonstrate that there were two different women. Keep trying. But first, READ. We are not idiots, but you seem like one here. Also, Dr. Chojnowski is poorly portrayed. Need a better actor!

-

FROM DR. MASCARO'S ORAL SURGEON REPORT

After reviewing the photographic and video evidence over the course of several months, it is clear that “Lucy I” (Subject A/B) and “Lucy II” (Subject C/D) are not the same individual. Several anatomical facts support this conclusion particularly when the profiles are compared.

RETROGNATHIC VS. PROGNATHIC PROFILES

Lucy I’s mouth/teeth tend to extend anteriorly (forward). In other words, her mouth area sticks out relative to her other facial structures. This is an underlying feature of Lucy I’s skeletal structure. This skeletal structure would not significantly change if all of her teeth were extracted and dentures worn. In contrast, Lucy II’s profile presents a nearly opposite condition: a prognathic profile with a concave appearance.

TOOTH EXTRACTION AND DENTURES

Skeletal structure would not significantly change if all of her teeth were extracted and dentures worn.

Dentures, which seem to be at least reasonably well-fit, further support the conclusion that these images depict two different people. The presence of dentures would work to maintain the vertical dimension and prevent over-rotation of the mandible. With the vertical height maintained, there is no good explanation regarding Lucy II’s significant chin protrusion forward when compared to Lucy I.

In addition, Lucy II’s facial height does not appear radically different than Lucy I which, again, supports the opinion that removal of all the teeth is unable to account for the marked change in profiles, particularly the mandibular protrusion.

A SKELETAL, NOT DENTAL, DIFFERENCE

A severly prognathic chin is skeletal, not dental in origin.

CONCLUSION

During the course of my career, I have performed hundreds of jaw osteotomies (precisely planned fractures of the jaw to reposition the bones) and extracted thousands of teeth. I am familiar with expected changes to an individual’s face as a result of tooth extraction and placement of dentures. It is my opinion that Lucy I and Lucy II are not and cannot be the same individual. These opinions are offered to a reasonable degree of medical certainty.


Comments

  1. Fatima MessengerOctober 24, 2021 at 5:13 PM

    The real Sister Lucia didn't "lose all of her teeth and has new denture" you idiot. The denture doesn't change the eyebrow, nose, forehead, and the whole cheekbone... of a person. What about the DNA? Did the new "denture" change her DNA too? Those who denied the truth just make them look real stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  2. NikMonkOctober 27, 2021 at 12:21 AM

    I used this silly skit on Reason and Theology as a way to recommend, about a dozen times, that people have a look at the ‘Wynn Young’ YouTube channel, and make up their own minds about the evidence. My comments were deleted almost as fast as I made them, but a few are still there.

    Now I am blocked from Reason and Theology, Kevin is not pleased with me. No-one censors something unless they are afraid it is true!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?

-
Image
  Here are the list of the 53 Cardinals who met in Rome for the Conclave in Rome in October 1958.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_electors_for_the_1958_papal_conclave Dr. Chojnowski: This telegraph from Ambassador Zellerbach (US ambassador to Italy) and the Secretary of State of the United States under the Eisenhower administration, John Foster Dulles is a clear path mark indicating to us what we should be looking for as regards the happenings in the 1958 papal conclave that met from October 25-28, exactly 2 weeks after this telegram to the US Secretary of State was written and sent.  What do we read in this telegram and why does it matter in our investigation into the fate of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima? We do not, as of yet, have a smoking gun telegram, but this one is clearly a picture of a double-barrel shot gun loaded, locked, safety off, aimed, and finger on the trigger communication. The US government seems an imminent "threat" and it is ready to act --- n
Read more

Tragic Disappearance of the Real Sister Lucy dos Santos Foretold to Jacinta, Right Before She Died, by the Blessed Virgin Mary. Contrary to being Safely Stowed in a Convent, Sister Lucy's Life was Always Under Threat.

-
Image
Did Our Lady Predict, in 1920, the Constant Persecution and Final Demise of Sister Lucy of Fatima? It appears so.  Dr. Chojnowski: Here are a basic chronological description of the life of Lucy dos Santos up until her sudden disappearance sometimes between 1957 and 1967. I would like to put special emphasis --- as I did with my bolding of the text and capitalization  --- on the Prophecy that Our Lady made to Jacinta immediately before her death concerning her cousin Lucy. For all of the below, we follow the account given in the excellent text by Mark Fellows,  Fatima in Twilight (Niagra Falls, Ontario: Marmion Publications, 2003).  The Life of Lucia dos Santos, Seer of Fatima Life before and during the Apparition, both of the Angel and of the Mother of God Lucia dos Santos, born the sixth and last child of Antonio and Maria dos Santos. She came into the world on March 22, 1907. Her family and that of her 1 st cousins Jacinta and Franscisco Marto lived in a little
Read more

The Shepherd is Struck and the Sheep Run Towards the Wolf's Lair? Is the Report About the Defection of the General Bursar of the SSPX, Fr. Suarez, True? Does Any One Have More Information About this Report? They Sent a Limousine For Archbishop Lefebvre and He DID NOT Get In. Was a Phone Call From Francis All that Was Necessary?

-
Image
Call From a Phone Booth in Menzingen, Holy Father! http://blog.messainlatino.it/2019/05/leconomo-generale-o-ex-della-fraternita.html "The general bursar (or former bursar) of the Fraternity of St. Pius X, hosted in St. Martha by the Pope and incardinated in the Diocese of Rome? Trustworthy sources tell us that what the official website of the Saint Pius X Fraternity (HERE and HERE) refers to as (or can we say "was"? See HERE) the General Treasurer of the Fraternity, Don Pablo Suarez, has been living in S. Marta for a few days and, it seems, is being incardinated in the Diocese of Rome as a priest at the disposal of the Holy Father. All this after a personal phone call from the Holy Father, after a direct contact between Don Suarez and Francis, motivated by an ancient friendship between them. Pablo Enrique Suarez was ordained in 2001; he was appointed Bursar of the District of South America and then in 2014, General Bursar of FSSPX. Suarez himself seems to have bee
Read more