Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person.
Sister Lucy I: Missing Sister Lucy II: Impostor I can now release the overall results of the facial recognition tests that have been performed using the most up to date technology available analyzed by the most sophisticated software technicians and organized and analyzed by an expert investigator. "The only thing similar was the habit" were the words I just heard from the investigator in our phone conversation about the result. More specifics on the technicalities of the result will follow this initial announcement. On advice, I will not yet reveal the names of the investigators, the names of the companies involved, or the names of the programs being used. They are the best. They are all working on a comprehensive and definite report on the results and this will be released in the coming weeks. I want to avoid any interference in the investigation. After the final facial recognition report is complete, the second phase of the investigation will be launched whi...
Subscribers can also see and share widely your recent excellent talk at the Sr Lucia Truth Conference, part of which, since there is only audio, is best listened to while looking at the photos at sisterlucyimposter.org.
ReplyDeleteyoutube.com/watch?v=mc2--3SCR9c (Sister Lucia Truth, Part1) youtube.com/watch?v=mc2--3SCR9c (Part 2)
The priest in the video gave a much needed reminder regarding private revelations. The Modernists probably created the impostor Lucy to keep the faithful attached to the new religion. O.K., thanks to Sr. Lucy Truth, now we know with scientific certainty that there was indeed an impostor.
ReplyDeleteBut some misguided Catholics think that if it had been the real Lucy who recognized the Modernists as legitimate leaders of the Church, then it would've been a sign from heaven that they were indeed legitimate. This is wrong. Private revelations and their seers are not infallible. They do not possess that sort of power and authority over the faithful. And the Church does not, and cannot, impose belief in a private revelation and its contents, either on an individual or on the faithful at large.
Hey there. Dr Jonathan Gemmill here from New Zealand.
ReplyDeleteFr Jenkins SSPV is on point.
I pray that the new kid on the block Dr Taylor Marshall has the courage to follow truth to its conclusion 🙏.
Thank you Dr Chojowski for leading me to truth!! God bless, Ave Maria 🙏❤💙⛪⚓⛪.
Hi Dr. Gemmill,
DeleteI am a Traditional Catholic also from New Zealand. Please email me at samrsb@protonmail.com.
God bless,
Sam
Please explain to me why this self proclaimed Fatima expert tells Catholics that Fatima is ,"Divine Revelation and therefore infallible".
ReplyDeleteSeems there is more than one imposter playing the Fatima for fame and profit game.
Watch this video around 17:00 and beyond where she claims Fatima is,
"Divine revelation and therefore infallible."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBUsMCUd6gk