From the recent Gnosticon. We ask ourselves the question as to why this ritual, intentionally heretical and invoking all the major heretics of the distant past --- resembles so much the Novus Ordo Missae of the Masonic Paul VI, both in the ritual itself, the attitude of the celebrant (I think he would be classified as a "reverent" "conservative" "priest" --- by our friends on EWTN), and in the naturalistic Teilhardian theology articulated by the "priest." Could it be that the effective banning of the "Latin Mass" is payback by people associated with this Kabbalistic sect for the "burning of the Cathars," who are mentioned here as "saints"? The rejection of vicarious atonement by these heretics is very interesting, since we see the same thing in the theology of the Neo-Modernist heretic Josef Ratzinger. It is not the Body and Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ that is offered by these Neo-Manicheans, but rather the "
The sketch is rediculus. The poor woman died in 1958. Can you please do the DNA piece and get serious about this.
ReplyDeleteWhat? This is all part of the investigation. Forensic artists can be very accurate in their portrayal of aging people- that is why they are used to catch criminals regularly. I find it fascinating.
DeleteThe imposter gives me the heebie-jeebies.
ReplyDeleteOne of my main reasons for skepticism about the post-1958 Sister Lucy is that her eyes are more widely set apart when compared with all earlier pictures of Sister Lucy, dating back to when she was ten years old during the 1917 Fatima apparitions. I continue to see the discrepancy in the above depictions. All the plastic surgery in the world cannot change the distance between the eyes, since that distance is determined by the skull's eye sockets. My skepticism is further confirmed by the great disparity between the apparent ages of Sister Lucy I and Sister Lucy II.
ReplyDelete