Archbishop Lefebvre Recognized that Gallicanism is Not Possible. The question of the status of the pope MUST be answered. 42 years and We Still Cannot Recognize this?

Ultimately, the question of the status of the pope must be answered. Archbishop Lefebvre at this time (1976) simply could not make up his mind as to the status of the Destroyer Paul the Sick. The important part is the he was PUZZLING OVER THE QUESTION. He clearly states though that the pope cannot teach error, because he is guided and protected by the Holy Ghost. It is hard to get around the Archbishop's words, when we hear him speaking in his own voice in his own native language. I cannot imagine him being ANYTHING OTHER THAN a RAD TRAD THOMIST today!

Comments

  1. Excellent video, that I had never seen. He seems to be very confused on what to do about the pope situation. We obviously know with all of the video footage that Francis is speaking of his own free will constantly, so we can check that option off that he is held hostage. After Archbishop Lefebvre performed the consecrations in 1988 he was very, very strong in his condemnation of Rome, something most SSPX attendees don't know.

    ReplyDelete
  2. So then if he does teach and/or promulgate errors then he lacks authority and is a false Pope.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right? It's chicken and egg, which came first and why does it determine if he's Pope? "A man not canonically elected" I'll take Saint Francis's word for it.

      Delete
  3. The fact that we have an heretical line of "popes" at this point is no longer conjecture, but a simple observation that any catholic with a shred of catholic sense can make.

    One would have to be quite daft at this point to believe that the Great Archbishop would say otherwise at this point in time.

    When he said, "Rome is in Apostasy!", about whom do we suppose he was speaking? Not the mayor. Denial, wishful thinking, and twisted theology are the forces which allow these interlopers to continue to squat in the chair against all Divine Law. The Church Militant has become the Church Milquetoast.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "the intrinsic effect of separating the heretic from the Church by itself, without any ecclesiastical censure or judgment".

    Only a Church declaration can morally assure that we are dealing with formal or mere material heresy. Until then, individuals can think what they will about the errors in question, but not bindinly on anyone else's conscience. St. Thomas says we need not avoid one we think may be an excommicate by virtue of heresy "until sentence is passed".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do you know what comprises "formal" heresy? It has nothing whatever to do with a "sentence". The public and pertinacious nature of it makes it "formal". If you need someone to explain to you that the heresies of Francis are formal, your foil hat is on too tight.

      The church has ALWAYS taught that a heretic severs himself from the church, starting with Galatians 1:8. This has nothing to do with "whom to avoid." That is a different topic altogether.

      I know, I know. It's hard. But loosen the tinfoil just a bit, take a deep breath, and acknowledge the truth. Bergoglio is no pope at all.

      Delete
    2. Besides, who would you expect to pass a sentence on Francis? The modernist heretics who have been hand picked by the modernist heretics?

      Holy Mother Church would never put us in such a conundrum. What puts us in this situation is fifty years of parroting the silly notion that we are not allowed to believe our own eyes and our own ears.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

The Shepherd is Struck and the Sheep Run Towards the Wolf's Lair? Is the Report About the Defection of the General Bursar of the SSPX, Fr. Suarez, True? Does Any One Have More Information About this Report? They Sent a Limousine For Archbishop Lefebvre and He DID NOT Get In. Was a Phone Call From Francis All that Was Necessary?

Here We Go Again: Francis Explicitly Denies What the Church is All About and the Neo-Cons and the Neo-Trads Shout AMBIGUITY!!!!

Frankenmama: The Church on a Journey . When the Harlot of Babylon Jumps on the Backseat of a Motorcycle.

Quote from Archbishop Lefebvre Demonstrates that 40 Years has Changed NOTHING. So Why are We Still Arguing over the Self-Evident. The Long in Construction "Conciliar Church" is NOT the Catholic Church. You Cannot Have the Catholic Church Teaching a False and Modernist Faith. Period.

Francis Renounces Doctrine, Hierarchy, Order, Christ as Light of Truth to the World Through His Apostles, the Charity of Bringing the Faith to Others, and is left with..............Ringing the Salvation Army Bell in front of Wal-Mart?

Who Cares? The Remnant Moderator (Michael Matt?) Excises the Papacy from the "traditional Catholic Religion." Horrible Question to the 20,000 Pilgrims. Who do you see as a Rock of the Catholic Faith? Michael Matt's Remnant or "the Vatican of Pope Francis". Another little question. I thought "Counter-Revolutionaries" were Ultramontanists not Gallicans?

"Am I to stay here alone?" In Light of the Sister Lucy Truth Investigation, these words spoken by Sister Lucy to Our Lady during the June 13th, 1917 Apparition at Fatima are Even More Heart-Rendering. Read Cornelia Ferreira's Latest Fatima Newsletter Here.

More Than Metaphor: Our Lady at La Salette seems to have told us not only THAT the Church would be in "Eclipse," but WHEN IT WOULD GO INTO ECLIPSE, October 27th, 1958.

...una cum famulo tuo Michahel Matt et Christophorus Ferrara....Isn't it Strange How Francis Could Watch Athanasius Schneider Participate in the Matt/FSSP Catholic Identity Crisis Conference, without Censure or Disciplinary Action, Even Though Matt has Said that the "Remnant" "No longer accepts the Vatican of Pope Francis as a moral authority in ANYTHING." Strange. Just Sayin'