Archbishop Lefebvre Recognized that Gallicanism is Not Possible. The question of the status of the pope MUST be answered. 42 years and We Still Cannot Recognize this?

-
Ultimately, the question of the status of the pope must be answered. Archbishop Lefebvre at this time (1976) simply could not make up his mind as to the status of the Destroyer Paul the Sick. The important part is the he was PUZZLING OVER THE QUESTION. He clearly states though that the pope cannot teach error, because he is guided and protected by the Holy Ghost. It is hard to get around the Archbishop's words, when we hear him speaking in his own voice in his own native language. I cannot imagine him being ANYTHING OTHER THAN a RAD TRAD THOMIST today!

Comments

  1. AnonymousFebruary 28, 2018 at 8:19 AM

    Excellent video, that I had never seen. He seems to be very confused on what to do about the pope situation. We obviously know with all of the video footage that Francis is speaking of his own free will constantly, so we can check that option off that he is held hostage. After Archbishop Lefebvre performed the consecrations in 1988 he was very, very strong in his condemnation of Rome, something most SSPX attendees don't know.

    ReplyDelete
  2. danFebruary 28, 2018 at 11:25 AM

    So then if he does teach and/or promulgate errors then he lacks authority and is a false Pope.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousMarch 1, 2018 at 6:42 AM

      Right? It's chicken and egg, which came first and why does it determine if he's Pope? "A man not canonically elected" I'll take Saint Francis's word for it.

      Delete
  3. UnknownMarch 1, 2018 at 5:20 AM

    The fact that we have an heretical line of "popes" at this point is no longer conjecture, but a simple observation that any catholic with a shred of catholic sense can make.

    One would have to be quite daft at this point to believe that the Great Archbishop would say otherwise at this point in time.

    When he said, "Rome is in Apostasy!", about whom do we suppose he was speaking? Not the mayor. Denial, wishful thinking, and twisted theology are the forces which allow these interlopers to continue to squat in the chair against all Divine Law. The Church Militant has become the Church Milquetoast.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousMarch 20, 2018 at 6:47 AM

    "the intrinsic effect of separating the heretic from the Church by itself, without any ecclesiastical censure or judgment".

    Only a Church declaration can morally assure that we are dealing with formal or mere material heresy. Until then, individuals can think what they will about the errors in question, but not bindinly on anyone else's conscience. St. Thomas says we need not avoid one we think may be an excommicate by virtue of heresy "until sentence is passed".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownMarch 22, 2018 at 9:42 AM

      Do you know what comprises "formal" heresy? It has nothing whatever to do with a "sentence". The public and pertinacious nature of it makes it "formal". If you need someone to explain to you that the heresies of Francis are formal, your foil hat is on too tight.

      The church has ALWAYS taught that a heretic severs himself from the church, starting with Galatians 1:8. This has nothing to do with "whom to avoid." That is a different topic altogether.

      I know, I know. It's hard. But loosen the tinfoil just a bit, take a deep breath, and acknowledge the truth. Bergoglio is no pope at all.

      Delete
    2. UnknownMarch 22, 2018 at 9:47 AM

      Besides, who would you expect to pass a sentence on Francis? The modernist heretics who have been hand picked by the modernist heretics?

      Holy Mother Church would never put us in such a conundrum. What puts us in this situation is fifty years of parroting the silly notion that we are not allowed to believe our own eyes and our own ears.

      Delete
  5. AnonymousJune 4, 2022 at 5:26 PM

    Please pray to St. Dagobert ll :" St. Dagobert, faithful and true, with our sadness, but above all, with God's Most Merciful Grace, please hear us and to help and defense of the unborn and helpless. Amen."

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousJune 5, 2022 at 1:10 PM

    The Greatest Trick the Devil ever pulled, was convincing all that he really didn't exist".

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rev. Sam Osborne, Mysteries of the Mass, Gnosticon 4, Sept. 18th 2021. An Explanation of the Gnostic Rite of "Mass" that Leads Us to Wonder Why this Intentional Mass of the Albigensian, Manichean, and Gnostic Heretics is Almost Identical to the New Mass of the Masonic Paul VI.

-
Image
From the recent Gnosticon. We ask ourselves the question  as to why this ritual, intentionally heretical and invoking all the major heretics of the distant past --- resembles so much the Novus Ordo Missae of the Masonic Paul VI, both in the ritual itself, the attitude of the celebrant (I think he would be classified as a "reverent" "conservative" "priest" --- by our friends on EWTN), and in the naturalistic Teilhardian theology articulated by the "priest." Could it be that the effective banning of the "Latin Mass" is payback by people associated with this Kabbalistic sect for the "burning of the Cathars," who are mentioned here as "saints"? The rejection of vicarious atonement by these heretics is very interesting, since we see the same thing in the theology of the Neo-Modernist heretic Josef Ratzinger. It is not the Body and Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ that is offered by these Neo-Manicheans, but rather the "
Read more