Paul VI as Schismatic "Saint"? Fr Hesse Blows the Whistle on Paul VI's "canonized" Liturgical Revolution


Comments

  1. AnonymousFebruary 20, 2018 at 12:35 PM

    But Pope Benedict was at pains to stress that the NO IS the same liturgy. So Paul 6 did not change the Liturgy you see... the condemnations of Trent etc don't apply.
    Cheers
    Paul

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. J peterman33February 26, 2018 at 8:54 PM

      He's not infallible unless he speaks in the right formula to proclaim something. So, perhaps he was just mistaken and, mistaken or not, he was and is still pope.

      Delete
  2. AnonymousFebruary 21, 2018 at 12:58 PM

    Dear professor I have a question that maybe you will deem fit to answer at some time. Much of the "spirit of Vatican 2" centers around the so called newly discovered "dignity of Man." It is all wrapped up in modern personalism from philosophers like Husserl. JPll was much into this. The tradition and the Thomistic view do not in any way endorse this view. With original sin man lost original justice and needs a Redeemer to restore his dignity and friendship with God. If man has an innate dignity after the fall (not just traces) then he can redeem himself through ways other than Christ....is this what Vat2 teaches? Oh of course Jesus is the best way, but not the only way. It all sounds vaguely like Talmudic Freemasonry; Freedom, Equality and Fraternity...the Rights of man, the French Revolution (and communist revolution) with only a veneer of authentic Catholicism to trap the unsuspecting. The council more and more appears to be a disaster with criminal machinations involved. I have read Thomas on Craftiness, Guile and Fraud. To substantially depart from The Tradition is to cease to be Catholic. So was the Council a Catholic thing with traces of error or a very non Catholic thing with traces of Catholicism, I have come to believe it is the latter.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousFebruary 25, 2018 at 6:40 PM

    The assertion that the NO is the same liturgy as the TLM defies common sense.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousFebruary 26, 2018 at 8:18 PM

    Fr. Hesse made me into a traditional Catholic or lets just say plain old Catholic. You have to understand what you don't know first and he learned me when I was still going to the Novus Ordo on Sunday morning and wondering what was wrong.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

SSPX Accuses Francis of Heresy. As Far as I can tell, a "Document for Human Fraternity" that was intended to be spread throughout the world and bore the signature of Francis is a Public Act. No? So Francis is a Public Heretic or Public Apostate, No?

Image
https://fsspx.news/en/news-events/news/communiqué-superior-general-society-saint-pius-x-true-fraternity-45364?utm_source=Society+of+Saint+Pius+X+%7C+Newsletter&utm_campaign=3040eb7593-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_02_25_04_43&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_8c13eb2341-3040eb7593-206071633

I want to comment soon on the various statements that Michael Matt has made on the "situation" of the "crisis." However, before than we cannot let pass the just released statement by the SSPX on the apostasy of Francis at Abu Dhabi in which he signed a document which states that God willed the diversity of religions. Since this is a denial of the very essence of the Christian faith insofar as he is rejecting the whole purpose of the Church and the very idea of a unique Divine Revelation, originating with the preaching of the Incarnate Word and complemented by the revelation given to the Apostles by the Holy Ghost, I would argue that this is an act of apostasy. This act and such state…
Read more

Modernist Pope or Gallican Lawyer? Because Francis Did Not Answer the "Filial Correction" SIGNED BY CHRIS FERRARA --- He is SUSPENDED! Operation of the Papal Magisterium will depend upon Chris and Fr. Hunwicke determining that it has "formally return[ed] from dogmatic silence to the audible exercise of the functions rightly attributed to it in Catholic Tradition." Can someone put me on the email list so that I can know when I can listen to the Papal Magisterium again?

Image
In other words, Francis told el-Tayeb what he wanted to hear, and then told Bishop Schneider what he wanted to hear. He thus created space for plausible deniability for both parties.  This is behavior befitting a politician, not the Vicar of Christ, charged with confirming his brethren in the Faith.  But after six years of this sort of thing, can we expect anything else?
When Francis refused to answer the dubia of the Four Cardinals or the Filial Correction submitted to him by Fr. Hunwicke and many others, his silence in the face of attempted correction indicated, Fr. Hunwicke argues, that the Petrine Ministry had “entered into its current ‘temporary suspense’” and that “we are officially in a period in which the functions of the Papal Magisterium are in a vacatio which will be ended at the moment when the same Petrine Magisterial organ formally returns from dogmatic silence to the audible exercise of the functions rightly attributed to it in Catholic Tradition…”
It ought to be obvious …
Read more

Chirping Crickets and the Apostasy at Abu Dhabi: When is a Public Act of Apostasy a "Public Act of Apostasy"? Just Wondering.

Image
abu-dhabi-historic-document-signed-by-pope-francis-and-grand-imam-of-al-azhar

See Video Below:
https://youtu.be/F_prNq-EQSw

Dr. Chojnowski: I am still waiting for the document entitled "A Document on Human Fraternity For World Peace and Living Together" to have some real effect upon the "traditional world." Surely, it was a time for "profound reflection." A reflection that would be a summary of all the long train of outrages to the Catholic  Religion which have hit Catholics since October 28, 1958. Can it be true that we get a document which is intended to be published throughout the world and used as a constant source of academic and religious instruction, which rejects the fundamental understanding of the Catholic Church for 2,000 years, without it SIGNIFICANTLY changing or at least cementing in place our understanding of where we stand in this "crisis"? What we have with the document "On Human Fraternity" is a PUBLIC ACT OF APOSTASY. …
Read more

Gallicanism: Traditional Catholicism Without the Catholicism. Or Why Popes Matter.

Image
Lest we confuse when we sling the accusation of "Gallicanism" at those who continue to try to change the Church and the Faith in response to Francis and his abominations, we should define what we mean. Rather we will let Michael Miller, whose "Notes on Church History in France," were published in Dom Prosper Gueranger's book against Gallicanism, entitled, The Papal Monarchy, present the basic definition for us: "'Gallicanism' is a group of religious opinions which for some time was peculiar to the Church in France and the theological schools of that country. This view of the Church tended to restrict the authority of the pope, while extending the competence of the bishops and the temporal ruler."

"Gallican theory acknowledged papal primacy, but claimed that it was limited by the power of princes, by the authority of a general (ecumenical council), by the authority of the bishops, and by the canons and customs of local churches. According t…
Read more

Who are the Bad Fundamentalists that Francis and his Imam Friend Condemned as Evil in Abu Dhabi? I bet it was you!

Image
From the Zenit article on the Apostasy at Abu Dhabi:
https://zenit.org/articles/abu-dhabi-historic-document-signed-by-pope-francis-and-grand-imam-of-al-azhar/

Earlier today, Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin told journalists, including Zenit’s Deborah Lubov, that the importance of this day is dialogue among religions, especially Christianity and Islam, promoting peace and combatting fundamentalism.

Dr. Chojnowski: Have you wondered yet who are these "fundamentalists" who are the main source of evil in our world, the evil ones who are keeping the world from realizing a utopian existence of equality, fraternity, gender equity, and dialogue? I would bet that every one who is now reading this website would be fit into that category by not only the ridiculous women pictured above but by Francis the Apostate and his Imam "fellow believer." What is important here is how "official" it all is. The above statement about "dialogue among religions&…
Read more

Obama's Hell-Ride to War on Iran

Image
Daniel McAdams
LRC Blog
September 26, 2009

Faced with the uncomfortable and politically unacceptable reality that there exists no evidence that Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapon, confirmed by his own intelligence community, President Obama has taken a page from the book of his predecessors FDR, LBJ, GWB, and so on: he simply made something really scary-sounding up to justify his push toward war.

It is 2002 all over again, but worse.
This time it is the artificially manufactured hype around an Iranian uranium enrichment facility that is under construction. Keep in mind that as a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Iran, under Article IV of said treaty, has every right to enrich uranium to its heart’s content. The treaty clearly states: “Nothing in this Treaty shall be interpreted as affecting the inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination and in conformity w…
Read more