Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person.
Sister Lucy I: Missing Sister Lucy II: Impostor I can now release the overall results of the facial recognition tests that have been performed using the most up to date technology available analyzed by the most sophisticated software technicians and organized and analyzed by an expert investigator. "The only thing similar was the habit" were the words I just heard from the investigator in our phone conversation about the result. More specifics on the technicalities of the result will follow this initial announcement. On advice, I will not yet reveal the names of the investigators, the names of the companies involved, or the names of the programs being used. They are the best. They are all working on a comprehensive and definite report on the results and this will be released in the coming weeks. I want to avoid any interference in the investigation. After the final facial recognition report is complete, the second phase of the investigation will be launched whi...
K.I.S.S. Be my Valentine. Keep It Simple, Sweetheart. Post Fr. Alonso quotes around Lucia & brackets questioning her identity. Post two Lucias profile photos. State Kevin Symonds is thusly Satan and Seed, Inc. Voila! Literally going blind and served up a tome. Please. K.I.S.S.
ReplyDeleteTo understand the current state of Italian 'Traditional Catholicism,' one must look at its paradoxical obsession with a romanticized past—specifically the Austro-Hungarian and Bourbon eras—while ignoring the harsh geopolitical reality of the present.
ReplyDeleteFar from being a medieval relic of 'Sacred Power,' the 19th-century Austrian Empire was a quintessentially modern State. It was defined by a centralized, meritocratic bureaucracy and 'Josephinism'—a policy that effectively turned the Church into an organ of the State, subordinating clergy to imperial officials. By the time of its collapse, it had long ceased to be a universal spiritual authority, functioning instead as a rigid, administrative machinery that paved the way for European secularization.
Returning to the present, these circles, often led by professors or politicians who are handsomely paid by the very Unitary State they seek to delegitimize, are inadvertently serving the interests of Italy’s current masters. By undermining the concept of national sovereignty (a sovereignty recognized even by pre-conciliar Popes like Pius XI), they act as 'useful idiots' for the Atlantic hegemony. They attack the 19th-century Risorgimento but remain silent about Italy’s current status as a US protectorate.
The following points illustrate this profound incoherence: a 'Counter-Revolution' that functions as a comfortable hobby, protected by the welfare of a State they claim to despise, and serving a geopolitical agenda they refuse to acknowledge.
Spectator
Ash Wednesday: A Tale of Two Worlds
ReplyDeleteIn Italy, Ash Wednesday (today, Feb 18, 2026) has largely become a non-event. Secularization—or what some call the "Americanization/Masonic shift" pushed by Western liberal agendas—has taken its toll. Beyond a few million churchgoers (mostly aged 50+), ashes are now a rare sight, visible only in family photos or the Instagram feeds of devout Catholics. Outside of religious circles, it no longer serves as a relevant cultural signal for society at large.
In the United States, however, the dynamic is entirely different. We are witnessing a "hijacking" of this holy day by Catholic Americanists and conservatives. Political polarization has transformed religious gestures into identity banners.
For the "MAGA" coalition—a mix of Evangelicals, traditionalist Latino Catholics, and conservative Republicans—publicly displaying the cross of ashes is a way to signal: "We are the real people, defending traditional values against woke secularism."
In this context, the smudge on the forehead is no longer just a sign of penance; it’s a counter-cultural statement against the liberal mainstream.
The Political "Weaponization" of Ashes
A clear example (recurring since 2025) is Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Appearing on Fox News with visible ashes while discussing hardline geopolitics—such as Gaza and hostage crises—he triggers a polarized firestorm:
Conservatives applaud: "Finally, a leader who doesn't hide his faith!"
Progressives criticize: "The hypocrisy of talking about bombings with the ash of penance on your brow."
While figures like Biden have also worn ashes in the past, today’s display by prominent conservatives is far more "political." It is a calculated move to solidify the White Evangelical + Latino Catholic voting bloc.
The Bottom Line:
In Italy, Ash Wednesday is fading into residual folklore. In the U.S., it has been weaponized as a tool of tribal signaling in the culture war. For Americanist conservatives, those ashes aren't just about "remembering you are dust"—they are a bold "fuck you" to the secularized progressive establishment.
I hate you with all my heart, USA (I hope to witness your fall someday).
Agreed. (w/Anon. @4:54.)
ReplyDeleteFeast of San Jacinta, 20 Feb 2026 AD
"Christ is King": Faith or Instrumentum Regni?
ReplyDeleteThere is a bitter paradox in seeing certain "Americanist" movements today brandishing the slogan "Christ is King." For a Catholic who recognizes the Social Kingship of Christ, this is not just exploitation—it is a profound historical hypocrisy.
1. America as a driver of secularization
It is ironic that this cry comes from the United States. If there is one power that, throughout the 20th century, accelerated the secularization of Europe and Italy, displacing Christ as King of formerly Christian societies, it was America. It did so by exporting a model based on relativism, rampant consumerism, and a sharp separation between faith and public life.
2. Americanism will not step aside
Let’s not be fooled: a Trump victory will not turn the U.S. into a Catholic nation or a genuine theocracy. The official "religion" of the United States will remain Americanism. The central dogma will still be the American Way of Life and the "American Dream," where God is often reduced to a business partner expected to guarantee prosperity and material success.
3. A mere "Instrumentum Regni"
Using the name of Christ in electoral contexts or to justify nationalist agendas is a textbook example of instrumentum regni: religion used as a tool of power to rally the masses and polarize conflict. It is not about seeking the submission of the heart to God, but about using His name to win a worldly cultural battle.
Why is this so frustrating?
Because it debases a sacred truth. Seeing the King of Heaven and Earth reduced to a campaign gimmick by the very culture that helped dethrone Him from European society is an insult to historical consistency and the dignity of faith.
"Christ is King": Faith or Instrumentum Regni?
ReplyDeleteThere is a bitter paradox in seeing certain "Americanist" movements today brandishing the slogan "Christ is King." For an Italian Catholic who recognizes the Social Kingship of Christ, this is not just exploitation—it is a profound historical hypocrisy.
1. America as a driver of secularization
It is ironic that this cry comes from the United States. If there is one power that, throughout the 20th century, accelerated the secularization of Europe and Italy, displacing Christ as King of formerly Christian societies, it was America. It did so by exporting a model based on relativism, rampant consumerism, and a sharp separation between faith and public life.
2. Americanism will not step aside
Let’s not be fooled: a Trump victory will not turn the U.S. into a Catholic nation or a genuine theocracy. The official "religion" of the United States will remain Americanism. The central dogma will still be the American Way of Life and the "American Dream," where God is often reduced to a business partner expected to guarantee prosperity and material success.
3. A mere "Instrumentum Regni"
Using the name of Christ in electoral contexts or to justify nationalist agendas is a textbook example of instrumentum regni: religion used as a tool of power to rally the masses and polarize conflict. It is not about seeking the submission of the heart to God, but about using His name to win a worldly cultural battle.
Why is this so frustrating?
Because it debases a sacred truth. Seeing the King of Heaven and Earth reduced to a campaign gimmick by the very culture that helped dethrone Him from European society is an insult to historical consistency and the dignity of faith.
The SSPX is right to seek the Vatican's blessing on the consecration of their new bishops (even if it will be refused by Leo XIV.)
ReplyDeleteThe SSPX is right to address Leo XIV as "The Holy Father."
The sedevacantists and the Talmudic highly paid controlled-oppositions Trad Inc are all lost in a maze on what to say about the SSPX. They don't seem to realize that Leo is The Emperor's New Clothes and Satan in disguise as The Pope. https://kokxnews.substack.com/p/trad-watch-friday-sspx-weekly-news/comment/218541220
The SSPX is the last Roman Catholic bastion and biggest formidable army of King Jesus Christ who can save the Traditional Latin Mass and the Scripture and Tradition of the Roman Catholic Church, and defeat the Talmudic Trojan Horse invaders at the Vatican II Council now culminating in their Talmudic One World Religion Synodal Church. https://kokxnews.substack.com/p/trad-watch-friday-sspx-weekly-news/comment/217192527
ReplyDeleteWe must do our part no matter how small to help save the Roman Catholic Church from utter destruction by Leo XIV who is the head of the serpent that Our Lady must crush now . https://radicalfidelity.substack.com/p/more-false-faith-filth-and-fiends/comment/216203752
ReplyDeleteJackson’s Delusion: Why "Cheering" for the American Right is the Final Act of Apostasy
ReplyDeleteChris Jackson’s analysis on BigModernism is the lament of someone who sees the flames but continues to praise the arsonists simply because they are wearing a fireman's uniform. Jackson denounces Leo XIV for attacking the Spanish "right," but he fails to grasp the fundamental point: the problem is not "which" political side the Pope chooses, but the fact that the Church has reduced itself to a mere internal faction of the American liberal-democratic system.
1. The Trap of Alternation (The "Trump Method")
Jackson praises conservative leaders like Trump, ignoring that they are integral parts of the same script. As seen during various "conservative" administrations, a right-wing shift does not touch the foundations of the Informal Empire nor its global secularizing drive.
The system is engineered so that any small "pro-life" or "traditional" victory is fragile and reversible—a temporary concession to vent dissent without ever questioning the liberal order.
To praise a political leader within this framework is to accept the enemy's rules of the game. Jackson fails to see that the Church, since 1944, has ceased to be Mater et Magistra to become an "ethical NGO" that swings between right and left depending on the winds blowing from Washington.
2. The Church as a Mirror of American Democracy
When Leo XIV scolds Spanish bishops for being "too far-right," he isn't practicing theology; he is performing system maintenance.
In Jackson’s view, the solution would be a Pope who praises the Right. In reality, that would change nothing: it would merely be the other side of the same Americanist coin. The Church has been "democratized" in the worst sense: it has adopted the dialectic of political parties. If one Pope embraces a progressive agenda, the next might grant some crumbs to the conservatives, but the dogma of Religious Liberty (understood as State indifferentism) and the submission to American temporal power remain untouched. The apostasy continues; only the tempo changes.
3. Spain and the End of Spiritual Authority
The collapse of the Faith in Spain, documented by Jackson, is not caused by "poor communication strategies" from the Vatican, but by the fact that the Church has abdicated its mission of the Social Kingship of Christ.
By accepting the protection of the American Empire, the Church had to swallow its poison: the idea that religion is a private matter and that Truth must be subject to the laws of the market and consensus. Jackson’s "disgust" at the Pope’s words is legitimate, but his remedy is toxic: he desires a Church that acts as the "religious arm" of American conservatism, whereas the only salvation lies in a Church that breaks totally with Americanist ideology—whether progressive or conservative.
In short: Jackson views the Pope as a bad politician, when he should view him as a spiritual sovereign who is a prisoner (more or less willing) of a foreign empire. Until American commentators realize that liberal-democratic "conservatism" is merely the waiting room for progressivism, they will remain complicit in the very apostasy they deplore.