"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?
Here are the list of the 53 Cardinals who met in Rome for the Conclave in Rome in October 1958. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_electors_for_the_1958_papal_conclave Dr. Chojnowski: This telegraph from Ambassador Zellerbach (US ambassador to Italy) and the Secretary of State of the United States under the Eisenhower administration, John Foster Dulles is a clear path mark indicating to us what we should be looking for as regards the happenings in the 1958 papal conclave that met from October 25-28, exactly 2 weeks after this telegram to the US Secretary of State was written and sent. What do we read in this telegram and why does it matter in our investigation into the fate of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima? We do not, as of yet, have a smoking gun telegram, but this one is clearly a picture of a double-barrel shot gun loaded, locked, safety off, aimed, and finger on the trigger communication. The US government seems an imminent "threat" and it is ready to act --- n
The problem I see here is not your main conclusion (that Sr Lucia was replaced) but some of the arguments used in support of that.
ReplyDeleteFor example this testimony from Caroline that Sr Lucy never used a typewriter. My mother never used a smartphone either until the last couple of years of her life so by itself that's not really a strong point. It becomes even harder to make a point of this when you are also arguing Caroline never got to see or speak to Lucia anyway since at least 1959. Otherwise one is trying to have it both ways. I think we need to say Caroline wouldn't know either way (except up to a very out of date point in time).
The second point worth raising here is there is another aspect to the family objection that isn't really addressed on the SLT website. The response to why wouldn't her family know tends to focus on the control nature of visits to the monastery. But there is also the fact they surely would have been able to see photos and video footage as much as anyone else especially following the reporting of major Papal visits (1967, 1982 etc).
https://youtu.be/Ap414SwyCdc
ReplyDelete