Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person.
Sister Lucy I: Missing Sister Lucy II: Impostor I can now release the overall results of the facial recognition tests that have been performed using the most up to date technology available analyzed by the most sophisticated software technicians and organized and analyzed by an expert investigator. "The only thing similar was the habit" were the words I just heard from the investigator in our phone conversation about the result. More specifics on the technicalities of the result will follow this initial announcement. On advice, I will not yet reveal the names of the investigators, the names of the companies involved, or the names of the programs being used. They are the best. They are all working on a comprehensive and definite report on the results and this will be released in the coming weeks. I want to avoid any interference in the investigation. After the final facial recognition report is complete, the second phase of the investigation will be launched whi...
The problem I see here is not your main conclusion (that Sr Lucia was replaced) but some of the arguments used in support of that.
ReplyDeleteFor example this testimony from Caroline that Sr Lucy never used a typewriter. My mother never used a smartphone either until the last couple of years of her life so by itself that's not really a strong point. It becomes even harder to make a point of this when you are also arguing Caroline never got to see or speak to Lucia anyway since at least 1959. Otherwise one is trying to have it both ways. I think we need to say Caroline wouldn't know either way (except up to a very out of date point in time).
The second point worth raising here is there is another aspect to the family objection that isn't really addressed on the SLT website. The response to why wouldn't her family know tends to focus on the control nature of visits to the monastery. But there is also the fact they surely would have been able to see photos and video footage as much as anyone else especially following the reporting of major Papal visits (1967, 1982 etc).
https://youtu.be/Ap414SwyCdc
ReplyDelete