"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?
Here are the list of the 53 Cardinals who met in Rome for the Conclave in Rome in October 1958. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_electors_for_the_1958_papal_conclave Dr. Chojnowski: This telegraph from Ambassador Zellerbach (US ambassador to Italy) and the Secretary of State of the United States under the Eisenhower administration, John Foster Dulles is a clear path mark indicating to us what we should be looking for as regards the happenings in the 1958 papal conclave that met from October 25-28, exactly 2 weeks after this telegram to the US Secretary of State was written and sent. What do we read in this telegram and why does it matter in our investigation into the fate of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima? We do not, as of yet, have a smoking gun telegram, but this one is clearly a picture of a double-barrel shot gun loaded, locked, safety off, aimed, and finger on the trigger communication. The US government seems an imminent "threat" and it is...
He was told or taught to do so even before he was ordained as a priest. The man is not capable to invented such a new formula of the baptism. That's to show you people how corrupted and disorderly in the New World Order religion of the Vatican II. I told you, that's a pseudo catholic church. That's a NEW RELIGION OF THE ANTICHRIST. Why don't you Catholics questioning everything first before you swallowed everything down?
ReplyDeleteNow, come to other sacraments, I believe they have been changed the words and had became invalid. Accept the Matrimony. I never attended any wedding in their Novus Ordo, so I don't know what they said in that ceremony to tell you valid or not.
But other sacraments, I am quite sure they had changed. How do I know those sacraments are invalid? Again, I am an old fashion Catholic, a pure traditional, I use the rule Christ teaches "Look at the fruit to know the tree." I know a young priest he claims that he can perform "miracles" cast out the devils/demons, cure the sick, convert the sinners... etc. A few months later, look like the devils and demons that he claimed he casted out, were resided in him.
The Vatican II is a "den of thieves, liars, and murders..." They ruined others and themselves.
Pray a great deal for Pope Benedict XVI, he needs to make a decision now before the tribulation, 3/4 of humanity will be lost and thrown to hell because of the shepherds fail to do their jobs.
Benedict XVI was the fifth in a series of antipopes beginning with John XXIII. The more than adequate evidence for this is at www.whitesmoke1958.com, and re- Benedict in particular, see www.novusordowatch.org/benedict-xvi/
DeleteThe invalidity of priestly and episcopal orders in the Vatican II "counterfeit church of darkness" (Venerable Anne Catherine Emmerich's prophesy) can be clearly perceived in the new "episcopal consecration rite" imposed on the Church by the homosexual antipope Paul VI in 1968: https://novusordowatch.org/2018/06/unholy-orders-50-years-invalid-ordinations
And if any readers don't yet know Paul VI was an unchaste homosexual, see
www.traditioninaction.org/ProgressivistDoc/A_094_MontiniHomo.html (and 2 other related short articles there)
His mother was also an apparently falsely converted Jew, if the occult Jewish/Masonic symbols on her tombstone are any indication. They can be seen on Google images and elsewhere.
Like the saying goes, truth is often stranger than fiction. But these unpleasant truths have been long-prophesied.
Change one word and the Sacrament is NOT conferred -- e.g. change the word in the consecration from "many" to "all" and there is NO TRANSUBSTANTIATION.
ReplyDeleteIt is said that the New Ordination Rite is invalid as well as the New Consecration Rite for a Bishop.
The Blessing of the sick is NOT the same as the Extreme Unction or Last Sacrament.