Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person.
Sister Lucy I: Missing Sister Lucy II: Impostor I can now release the overall results of the facial recognition tests that have been performed using the most up to date technology available analyzed by the most sophisticated software technicians and organized and analyzed by an expert investigator. "The only thing similar was the habit" were the words I just heard from the investigator in our phone conversation about the result. More specifics on the technicalities of the result will follow this initial announcement. On advice, I will not yet reveal the names of the investigators, the names of the companies involved, or the names of the programs being used. They are the best. They are all working on a comprehensive and definite report on the results and this will be released in the coming weeks. I want to avoid any interference in the investigation. After the final facial recognition report is complete, the second phase of the investigation will be launched whi...
Sr Lucia must have been removed from the convent "for her safety," by those who ended up killing her, and her family and the nuns were probably ordered under obedience not to say anything, and besides, if they disobeyed and did not keep it secret, "Sr Lucia's safety would be greatly jeopardized."
ReplyDeleteI read somewhere that she was ordered by "the Vatican" in the persons of Msgr. Montini (the future anti-pope Paul VI) and Jose Maria Escriva' to move from the Dorothean Convent to the Carmelites. There were probably communist or otherwise enemy infiltrators in the latter, making it easier for the later (probably 1958, same year as the overthrow of the papacy) "disappearing" of Sr Lucia and her replacement by apparently two successive impostors, one rather plump one just making a brief early appearance, as the early cover of Fatima in Lucia's Own Words shows.