"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?
Here are the list of the 53 Cardinals who met in Rome for the Conclave in Rome in October 1958. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_electors_for_the_1958_papal_conclave Dr. Chojnowski: This telegraph from Ambassador Zellerbach (US ambassador to Italy) and the Secretary of State of the United States under the Eisenhower administration, John Foster Dulles is a clear path mark indicating to us what we should be looking for as regards the happenings in the 1958 papal conclave that met from October 25-28, exactly 2 weeks after this telegram to the US Secretary of State was written and sent. What do we read in this telegram and why does it matter in our investigation into the fate of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima? We do not, as of yet, have a smoking gun telegram, but this one is clearly a picture of a double-barrel shot gun loaded, locked, safety off, aimed, and finger on the trigger communication. The US government seems an imminent "threat" and it is ready to act --- n
Was Russia consecrated?
ReplyDeleteWhy you asked such a stupid question? Don't you see anything around in the world to answer your own question?
ReplyDeleteActually, the only stupid question is the one that is not asked. A simple charitable answer would suffice, e.g., No, not as Our Lady requested. Pius XII consecrated Russia privately, not publicly and in union with the world's bishops as Our Lady requested. And the consecration cannot be done by the Vatican II anti-popes even if they wanted to. It requires a validly elected pope and the last one was Cardinal Giuseppe Siri, who took the name Gregory XVII on Oct 26, 1958, after which there was 5 minutes of white smoke and Vatican Radio announcing, "There can be no doubt -- a pope has been elected!" He was then given a message through the Freemason Cardinal Tisserant from the Jewish Masonic organization B'nai B'rith threatening to nuke the Vatican and its environs if he didn't step down, which he did -- invalidly. Anti-pope John XXIII was invalidly elected 2 days later. A good intro to the subject is "Papal Imposters," and a more thorough presentation is at "The Siri Project" channel (start with the 3 min 41 sec segment), both on youtube.
DeleteFifth Sunday Aafter Easter
ReplyDelete9th May, 2021 A. D.
There is no such thing as a dumb question. The answer Daniel is no. Russia was never consecrated.
That is I believe a primary motive to remove Sr. Lucia of Fatima from the picture: she never backed down on the truth of what Our Lady said. She already assessed various attempts at consecrating the world and declared them wanting as to what was asked of Russia in that they failed to meet the simple request of Our Lady, which is this:
That the Pope consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart; and that he order all the bishops of the world to do likewise. Publicly and at the same time.
This Pius IX could not bring himself to do. This Pius XII could not bring himself to do. And far less could or would John XXIII or Paul VI.
Nor did John Paul II bring himself to consecrate Russia in this manner. John Paul I (Albino Luciani) may have done so, as he seemed intent on purging the Church of certain scoundrel cardinals and archbishops. He I suspect was open to following the commands of Our Lady of Fatima, which once having read the third secret—both parts—he may have been moved to act. But he never had the chance, being assassinated a mere 33 days into his reign...no autopsy; embalmment within 12 hours of discovery of the crime by sundown the same day(!). Nothing to see here.
Nor tragically did Pope Benedict XVIth, although while he still has breath he still has time. It is my devout prayer that he could and will still do so.
Don’t look to Antipope Francis as he’s not a valid pope. He is the very vanguard of the apostasy in the Church foretold by Our Lady at Fatima, and likely the false pope of Fatima leading the people into a Church of Hell. At a personal meeting—the only one between the men—Antipope Francis rebuffed Vladimir Putin’s request to discuss Fatima.
The fake Sister Lucy assured the world, by contrast, that the consecration by oblique reference amidst yet another world consecration as performed by John Paul II in 1982 “was accepted” in the eyes of heaven. That, and to endorse the false claim of Bertobe/Sodano/Ratzinger that the Third Secret was fully revealed in 2000–and by extension to justify and cover for the crime of John XXIII who freely choose to disobey a direct command of Our Lady and to suppress the entire Third Secret in 1960 by failing to reveal it; and finally to endorse the suicidal changes of Vatican II:
These are the three reasons the second Sr. Lucy the Imposter was invented in 1967. This is her three-fold fraudulent raison d’etre.
Errata:
ReplyDeletePius XI (Achilles Ratti), not Pio Nono.
Thx.
I hope this helps.
C. B.