"Fatima Faces II". Attitude, bone structure, demeanor, handwriting, totally different. And we wonder why the evil forces who did this thought they could get away with it. Now the evidence is clearly in our face and, yet, no one "sees" it. "Fatima Faces II"

Comments

  1. No greater blind than the one who refuses to see...

    ReplyDelete
  2. You know what I think. I think the real DISCIPLES OF THIS LATTER TIME MUST BE BORN AND RISE UP IMMEDIATELY. They are here but lack of prayers and sacrifices, God would not give them order to come out of hiding. Joan of Arc, Ignatius, and real Crusaders must take action in physical as army to take those fake shepherds out by the neck and hang them in public to set a lesson to all. Or
    3 DAYS OF DARKNESS MUST COME AND DESTROY THEM. I don't see anything else would work. A bunch of stupid and cowardice dressing in Purple and Red as Cardinals and Bishops. But they are wolves and devils in disguise. People below like Priests, Brothers, and Nuns not dare to open their mouths. The whole church is in eclipse, 100% in the darkness.

    WHY IS THIS HAPPENING TO THE HOLY CATHOLIC CHURCH? BECAUSE THE DEVILS HAD LURKED INSIDE THE CHURCH FOR CENTURY AND WORKING THEIR WAY UP TO THE TOP. IN 1960 THEY BEGUN TO SHOW UP THEIR FACES IN VATICAN II RELIGION AND STILL NOBODY SEEN ANYTHING OR SPOKE OUT AGAINST THEM, RESISTED THEM STRONLY.

    IF WE RESISTED THEM STRONGLY IN 1960, THE NWO OF THE LUCIFERIANS WOULD NOT HAVE A CHANCE TO DESTROY THE WHOLE PLANET LIKE THEY HAVE DONE NOW. THE JEWS AND PROTESTANTS WOULD NOT INFLUENCED AND STOLEN OUR MASS. WHEN THE MASS HAD CHANGED, THE BELIEF OF THAT RELIGION IS CHANGED. THUS, VATICAN II IS NOT A CATHOLIC CHURCH BUT THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN, THE SEED OF THE JEWISH CABALS.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The true Third Secret of Fatima has to deal with this attack on the Church. God has allowed this chastisement because the hierarchy didn't completely respond to Our Lord's wishes and the faithful had become lukewarm. Many Catholics turned to the Modernist heresy. They wanted the evil freedoms of their protestant and non Catholic neighbors. God obliged them. The third secret is mostly spiritual although it has a physical component. We can know this because Sr. Lucia told us by 1960 these chastisements would begin. With the probable Martyrdom of Sr. Lucia and Pope Pius XII Roncalli and his gang could begin the work of the Devil with the creation of the Vatican II heresy. The Church has been relegated to the catacombs, She will rise victorious with Our Lady's triumph.

      Delete
    2. How many people know that Pius XII read the Third Secret of Fatima on May 13, 1957, and then secluded himself for close to two weeks, weeping bitter tears?
      www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-lvHTJsL6o

      Would the "vision of the bishop dressed in white" revealed in 2000 have such an effect? Hardly! And we know Sr Lucia couldn't get herself to write down the Secret, she who had no difficulty revealing the traumatic vision of hell and the impending annihilation of many nations. Her bishop previously having requested her to write down the Secret was not enough. She told him she could not get herself to write it down unless he ordered her to, and even then she still couldn't do it until Our Lady appeared to her and told her she could put it in writing for Bishop Silva, who didn't read it but sent it to Pius XII.

      Almost everyone thinks John XXIII read the Secret first in 1960 (he actually read it in 1959). We know now that he and his Masonic-Modernist associates, themselves subject to greater Masonic-Communist-Zionist powers, and ultimately diabolical powers, wanted the Secret buried forever, and Sr Lucia along with it.

      Delete
    3. "Sr. Lucia went along with it." Nonsense. If John Paul II had to beg his handler to mention "Russia" in the consecration on his visit to Fatima NOBODY has any idea of the depth and breadth of the infiltration and coercion. If Melanie Calvat of La Salette could be imprisoned in a Carmelite Monastery, why not the REAL Sister Lucia? Ugly presumption that Lucia dos Santos, who braved being boiled in oil, was somehow complicit in any contravention of Our Lady's words and God's will.

      Delete
    4. @HexagonGroup
      Who said "Sr Lucia went along with it" or "was somehow complicit in any contravention of Our Lady's words and God's will"? The real Sr Lucia, as you should know if you're following sisterlucytruth.org, was taken from her Carmelite Convent, probably under the pretense of keeping her safe from "enemies of the Church," and likely murdered. It was the impostor who went along with the diabolically criminal act of identity theft and with the subsequent distortion of the authentic Message of Fatima, as https://sisterlucytruth.org/the-contradictions/ documents.

      Delete
    5. .... and if you think John Paul II had to beg his handler to mention "Russia" in the consecration on his visit to Fatima, you don't know the scandalous truth about this charismatic actor, deceiver, and Modernist. Over 99% of Catholics don't. Much of it is here: chiesaviva.com/430%20mensile%20ing.pdf

      Much more is at that website, but they don't go so far as to say the Vatican II papal claimants are all antipopes, which is the truth, as whitesmoke1958.com documents.

      Other scandalous facts re- the V2 "saint" popes:

      traditionalcatholic.co/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/John-XXIII-Beatified.pdf
      traditioninaction.org/ProgressivistDoc/A_094_MontiniHomo.html
      (and 2 other short related articles there)
      stevensperay.wordpress.com/2017/10/08/pope-st-john-xxiii-or-antipope-john-xxiii/
      stevensperay.wordpress.com/2018/10/14/pope-st-paul-vi-or-antipope-paul-vi/
      More on John Paul II:
      http://www.catholictradition.org/Papacy/papacy-expose4c.htm

      “It is better for scandals to arise than for the truth to be covered up.” (Pope St. Pius X)

      Delete
  3. Did the switch happen when Sr Lucy changed religious orders ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No. She was a fully professed Carmelite nun through most of the 1950s. It was only around the years 1958 or 1959, at least by early 1967 that she disappeared, one way or another.

      Delete
  4. Did she not meet a Spanish bishop for the last time around 1957?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Are you referring to Fr. Fuentes, who was postulator of the cause of Francisco and Jacinta. She did give an interview to him on December 26, 1957. Her last authentic interview.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 1929 is when the Virgin Mary told Sister Lucia that this was the time for the consecration of Russia to her Immaculate Heart, the year Stalin, the murderous gay blade of Russia per MILES MATHIS "UPDATES" cut off bank credit to the Ukraine and took every grain of wheat and every chicken egg out of the Ukraine, starving millions to death. John Reed, Stalin's American cousin, covered up the genocide. Like France, with the king deposed 100 years to the day when warned to make the Sacred Heart his country's protective patron and refusing, the centenary of Fatima's consecration of Russia request of 2029 brings DOOM! DEFUND BISHOPS TO SAVE BISHOPS!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?

Rev. Sam Osborne, Mysteries of the Mass, Gnosticon 4, Sept. 18th 2021. An Explanation of the Gnostic Rite of "Mass" that Leads Us to Wonder Why this Intentional Mass of the Albigensian, Manichean, and Gnostic Heretics is Almost Identical to the New Mass of the Masonic Paul VI.