Invalid Sacraments. How a Subjectivist Epistemology and Philosophy (Phenomenology and Existentialism) Can Destroy the Sacraments as the Vessels of Sanctifying Grace.

-

Comments

  1. Gisèle A DemersMarch 3, 2021 at 10:39 PM

    Father Cekada, RIP

    ReplyDelete
  2. darrellMarch 4, 2021 at 6:51 PM

    This gives a thorough explanation of why the homosexual Paul VI's new episcopal consecration rite lacks the necessary form for the validity of the sacrament: novusordowatch.org/2018/06/unholy-orders-50-years-invalid-ordinations/

    Didn't know he was homosexual? See traditioninaction.org/ProgressivistDoc/A_094_MontiniHomo.html (and 2 other related short articles there)

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousMarch 6, 2021 at 7:05 AM

    What exactly is the "power of order?" Type out what it is in the Roman Rite.

    You also have to remember that the Church judges a schismatic rite in a different way than it judges a Catholic rite. Based on the council of Trent, the N.O. is a schismatic rite. Doesn't Fr. Gregory Hesse give us an example of a schismatic rite that the Church has judged as valid which does not "univocally express the power of order?"

    According to the book AA1025 the TLM's where the modernists priests botched the canon the Mass, the faithful also worshiped and received only bread.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?

-
Image
  Here are the list of the 53 Cardinals who met in Rome for the Conclave in Rome in October 1958.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_electors_for_the_1958_papal_conclave Dr. Chojnowski: This telegraph from Ambassador Zellerbach (US ambassador to Italy) and the Secretary of State of the United States under the Eisenhower administration, John Foster Dulles is a clear path mark indicating to us what we should be looking for as regards the happenings in the 1958 papal conclave that met from October 25-28, exactly 2 weeks after this telegram to the US Secretary of State was written and sent.  What do we read in this telegram and why does it matter in our investigation into the fate of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima? We do not, as of yet, have a smoking gun telegram, but this one is clearly a picture of a double-barrel shot gun loaded, locked, safety off, aimed, and finger on the trigger communication. The US government seems an imminent "threat" and it is...
Read more

Sister Lucia assassinated? Hidden? Replaced? Fatima Center Acknowledges the Existence of a Imposter Sister Lucy. Huge Breakthrough for Sister Lucy Truth.

-
Image
Here is the Just Released Statement of the Fatima Center:  Pinned by The Fatima Center @TheFatimaCenter 3 hours ago The Fatima Center's position is that it has been established with reasonable certainty that the woman presenting herself as Sister Lucia in all known public photos from 1967 onward was not the true Lucia.
Read more

Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person.

-
Image
Sister Lucy I: Missing Sister Lucy II: Impostor I can now release the overall results of the facial recognition tests that have been performed using the most up to date technology available analyzed by the most sophisticated software technicians and organized and analyzed by an expert investigator. "The only thing similar was the habit" were the words I just heard from the investigator in our phone conversation about the result. More specifics on the technicalities of the result will follow this initial announcement. On advice, I will not yet reveal the names of the investigators, the names of the companies involved, or the names of the programs being used. They are the best. They are all working on a comprehensive and definite report on the results and this will be released in the coming weeks. I want to avoid any interference in the investigation. After the final facial recognition report is complete, the second phase of the investigation will be launched whi...
Read more