"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?
Here are the list of the 53 Cardinals who met in Rome for the Conclave in Rome in October 1958. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_electors_for_the_1958_papal_conclave Dr. Chojnowski: This telegraph from Ambassador Zellerbach (US ambassador to Italy) and the Secretary of State of the United States under the Eisenhower administration, John Foster Dulles is a clear path mark indicating to us what we should be looking for as regards the happenings in the 1958 papal conclave that met from October 25-28, exactly 2 weeks after this telegram to the US Secretary of State was written and sent. What do we read in this telegram and why does it matter in our investigation into the fate of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima? We do not, as of yet, have a smoking gun telegram, but this one is clearly a picture of a double-barrel shot gun loaded, locked, safety off, aimed, and finger on the trigger communication. The US government seems an imminent "threat" and it is...
On the subject of valid sacraments.
ReplyDeleteBaptism of desire - perfect act of contrition - an unmarried man and woman stranded on a deserted island with no priest available can take marriage vows and can have a sacramental marriage with the same conditions of a perfect act of contrition. They must have their marriage validated if it becomes possible just as if someone who made a perfect act of contrition lives to be able to confess his sins, he is bound to confess the mortal sins forgiven by the perfect act of contrition. So if a sacrament of ordination is invalid because of lack of proper form. But the person being ordained didn't know that his ordination did not possess the proper form and he desired in his heart to be a priest of the Catholic Church. Wouldn't an ordination of desire take place?
We know from the book AA1025 the priest boasted of having another communist priest teach him how to botch the canon of the Mass, thus invalidating the Mass. If the N.O. Mass is invalid, but if this is not known by the priest or the faithful attending, but the priest is otherwise pious and devout. Which Mass merited more for the faithful attending? Because the TLM was invalidated by an act of impiety by the priest, it merited less, though because those attending could not tell they were at an invalid Mass, they still received some graces and merited some reward. It would seem to me if the faithful have no way of knowing a Mass is invalid, they will receive the graces and merit from God despite what the Godless have achieved.
I say this not to defend invalid Masses, but it seems to me people are unwilling to consider proper Catholic theology because they are to horrified to believe the logical conclusions. On the other hand, some are claiming there is no grace or eternal merit being obtained by those who attend the N.O. which scandalizes those who do and makes it impossible for them to study and believe the logical theological conclusions.
Whether the N.O. sacraments are invalid or not. We reject the pomp's and works of the modernists, just as we reject the pomp's and works of Satan. On the other hand, our obligation is to get everything validated, not to claim others have no grace or eternal merit, and are on the road to hell.