Fr. Hesse, in a Conference Given in the Early 2000s, Indicates that The Woman Pictured Below IS NOT the Real Sister Lucy of Fatima. So Both Fr. Gregory Hesse and Carlos Evaristo Recognized that this Woman was An Impostor.

-

Comments

  1. CatholicApril 7, 2020 at 1:49 AM

    Fr Hesse is really just a part of the "conservative" branch of the Novus Ordo Church which thinks it is free to question the ability of the Church to teach, rule and sanctify. He is not a part of the true Church which operates under obedience to true popes. He seems as much in love with his own learning as an impostor Sr Lucy was in love with the camera. His teachings do not help, but divide Catholics because he another Catholic who "knows better" than the Church. That is not how the Church works. It is infallible and indefectible.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ICHRJuly 3, 2020 at 2:34 PM

    I never said that this was not Sister Lucia and never authorized anyone to use this copyrighted photo on this website. Please remove it immediately or face legal action. Sincerely Carlos Evaristo

    ReplyDelete
  3. ICHRJuly 3, 2020 at 2:35 PM

    My email is ouremcastleinfocentre@gmail.com Carlos Evaristo

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousJuly 5, 2020 at 3:04 PM

    Did you SUSPECT that there was a fake Lucia at any point, Carlos?

    Yes or No? Simple answers.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?

-
Image
  Here are the list of the 53 Cardinals who met in Rome for the Conclave in Rome in October 1958.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_electors_for_the_1958_papal_conclave Dr. Chojnowski: This telegraph from Ambassador Zellerbach (US ambassador to Italy) and the Secretary of State of the United States under the Eisenhower administration, John Foster Dulles is a clear path mark indicating to us what we should be looking for as regards the happenings in the 1958 papal conclave that met from October 25-28, exactly 2 weeks after this telegram to the US Secretary of State was written and sent.  What do we read in this telegram and why does it matter in our investigation into the fate of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima? We do not, as of yet, have a smoking gun telegram, but this one is clearly a picture of a double-barrel shot gun loaded, locked, safety off, aimed, and finger on the trigger communication. The US government seems an imminent "threat" and it is...
Read more

Sister Lucia assassinated? Hidden? Replaced? Fatima Center Acknowledges the Existence of a Imposter Sister Lucy. Huge Breakthrough for Sister Lucy Truth.

-
Image
Here is the Just Released Statement of the Fatima Center:  Pinned by The Fatima Center @TheFatimaCenter 3 hours ago The Fatima Center's position is that it has been established with reasonable certainty that the woman presenting herself as Sister Lucia in all known public photos from 1967 onward was not the true Lucia.
Read more

Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person.

-
Image
Sister Lucy I: Missing Sister Lucy II: Impostor I can now release the overall results of the facial recognition tests that have been performed using the most up to date technology available analyzed by the most sophisticated software technicians and organized and analyzed by an expert investigator. "The only thing similar was the habit" were the words I just heard from the investigator in our phone conversation about the result. More specifics on the technicalities of the result will follow this initial announcement. On advice, I will not yet reveal the names of the investigators, the names of the companies involved, or the names of the programs being used. They are the best. They are all working on a comprehensive and definite report on the results and this will be released in the coming weeks. I want to avoid any interference in the investigation. After the final facial recognition report is complete, the second phase of the investigation will be launched whi...
Read more