"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?
Here are the list of the 53 Cardinals who met in Rome for the Conclave in Rome in October 1958. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_electors_for_the_1958_papal_conclave Dr. Chojnowski: This telegraph from Ambassador Zellerbach (US ambassador to Italy) and the Secretary of State of the United States under the Eisenhower administration, John Foster Dulles is a clear path mark indicating to us what we should be looking for as regards the happenings in the 1958 papal conclave that met from October 25-28, exactly 2 weeks after this telegram to the US Secretary of State was written and sent. What do we read in this telegram and why does it matter in our investigation into the fate of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima? We do not, as of yet, have a smoking gun telegram, but this one is clearly a picture of a double-barrel shot gun loaded, locked, safety off, aimed, and finger on the trigger communication. The US government seems an imminent "threat" and it is...
I couldn't stand this movie to the end. So much nonsense and insult to my intelligence. But it is the proof that dr Chojnowski is right and Mr. Evaristo is wrong. Who needs more to understand that sister Lucy was fake.
ReplyDeleteWell, you have proved, that this guy, is either a dupe or a liar, despite his holier than thou and aren't I clever and on the ball shtick.
ReplyDeleteAnd its interesting that the Fatima Centre were happy to entertain the imposter Sister Lucy theory, when it was needed to defend their narrative, but now, that there is substantial evidence, that this is the case, nothing at all, not even an attempt to question or refute.
I watched the whole video and the man seems persuasive...yet his explanation that Sr. Lucia was just misunderstood and misinterpreted all those years is simply not feasible. Would all those in the hierarchy involved with its safeguarding be sloppy with the translation of the secret, relying on those who were careless or purposely manipulative in such matters? My guess is that the hierarchy would get several translations from several trusted and gifted translators, compare them to find the accurate translation, THEN do whatever manipulating themselves (if that later seemed necessary).
ReplyDelete