Paul VI Refused to Meet with Imposter Sister Lucy during Her Sole Encounter with him on May 13, 1967. Montini the Modernist Spent 3 Minutes Speaking to "Sister Lucy" and Most of the Time Seems to Have been Spent Turning Down Her Request and Telling Her to OBEY.

Newspaper Article Depicted in Fr. Luigi Villa's book, Paul VI Beatified?

Above Newspaper Article from Voz da Fatima portrayed immediately above, indicates that the meeting and conversation between Paul VI and "Sister Lucy" only lasted for 3 minutes. The first article portrayed, I discovered in the book by Fr. Luigi Villa entitled Paul VI beatified?. It tells of the woman we now know as "Sister Lucy II" asking Paul VI for a private meeting --- if he believed she was the real Sister Lucy don't you think he would be interested in what she had to say (a new apparition, perhaps?) --- to this request the newspaper above cites him as responding, "As you can see, this is not the moment [I have not gotten all the publicity yet that is my due!]. If you wish then to convey something to me, tell it to your bishop and he will convey it to me. Put great trust in your bishop. Be obedient to him." What did the newly-minted "Sister Lucy" intending to convey to Paul VI? That she did not feel right about the illegal impersonation that she was now taking up? But, for Paul VI, how awkward would it have been to meet with someone you know to be a fraud. Be obedient! Take up the role that we have bestowed upon you and if you have any qualms of conscience or personal difficulties, go cry to the bishop!

Another of the many strange things surrounding this 1967 meeting, amidst the general strangeness of the entire Sister Lucy dos Santos case, is the obviously faked pictures of her in Fatima, with Paul VI. Obviously they could not have been near each other for very long since so many pictures have clearly been faked. What we can see in the first picture presented in the Fr. Villa book is a Sister Lucy who never changes her expression and is inhumanly stiff and artificial in many of the pictures with her and Paul VI. As she stays creepily still, with the exact same gaze and expression on her face, the bespectacled priest is right behind her head on the left of the picture, then in one of the pictures below he is just as close to her on the right side of the picture, then he is a bit of a distance looking with almost an alarmed look on his face. The source picture for all of these "cut and paste" jobs from "Fatima" is given below in two different versions of the exact same photo is portrayed below with NO ONE IN THE BACKGROUND. Note of course that all of this deception was released within one month of the "meeting" between the two.
Reality is stranger than fiction.








Comments

  1. UnknownMarch 8, 2019 at 5:49 AM


    Sister Lucy dos Santos died on May 31, 1949 -
    I encourage you to study the page of Moimunan https://moimunanblog.com/2018/05/30/65-aniversario-de-un-fallecimiento-ocultado/

    It was Tuesday in the octave of the Ascension; the lesson read on that day in the Mass [Siracides 51: 1-8, 5-12] describes exactly her departure to the Lord.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. BrotherBeowulfMarch 21, 2019 at 7:53 AM

      Just for the record, the last interview of Sr. Lucy was on St Stephen’s Day 1957, and not in 1958.

      Fr. Augustin Fuentes who was postulating for the cause of little Jacinta, was the interviewer. This interview appears fairly well documented by the good priest himself.

      Some have offered an explanation of the “defuncto in ‘49” thesis in addition to the later interview.


      Delete
  2. adrianafooshiMarch 8, 2019 at 6:26 AM


    Nice post, thanks for sharing with us.
    keep sharing more such kind of interesting articles. Thanks again.
    Pakistan Railway Fares

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousMarch 8, 2019 at 4:48 PM

    Sister Lucy disappeared (we don't know if she was murdered or secluded) after 1958 (the interview with Father Fuentes is authentic).

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousMarch 9, 2019 at 8:02 PM

    Yes exactly ! I remember thinking years later that she knew she was part of a charade and did not feel right about it ! She was also weeping at the time.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousMarch 10, 2019 at 7:09 PM

    The 1958 interview with Fr Fuentes was not an imposter...she could not have died in 1949

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

SSPX Accuses Francis of Heresy. As Far as I can tell, a "Document for Human Fraternity" that was intended to be spread throughout the world and bore the signature of Francis is a Public Act. No? So Francis is a Public Heretic or Public Apostate, No?

Image
https://fsspx.news/en/news-events/news/communiqué-superior-general-society-saint-pius-x-true-fraternity-45364?utm_source=Society+of+Saint+Pius+X+%7C+Newsletter&utm_campaign=3040eb7593-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_02_25_04_43&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_8c13eb2341-3040eb7593-206071633

I want to comment soon on the various statements that Michael Matt has made on the "situation" of the "crisis." However, before than we cannot let pass the just released statement by the SSPX on the apostasy of Francis at Abu Dhabi in which he signed a document which states that God willed the diversity of religions. Since this is a denial of the very essence of the Christian faith insofar as he is rejecting the whole purpose of the Church and the very idea of a unique Divine Revelation, originating with the preaching of the Incarnate Word and complemented by the revelation given to the Apostles by the Holy Ghost, I would argue that this is an act of apostasy. This act and such state…
Read more

Modernist Pope or Gallican Lawyer? Because Francis Did Not Answer the "Filial Correction" SIGNED BY CHRIS FERRARA --- He is SUSPENDED! Operation of the Papal Magisterium will depend upon Chris and Fr. Hunwicke determining that it has "formally return[ed] from dogmatic silence to the audible exercise of the functions rightly attributed to it in Catholic Tradition." Can someone put me on the email list so that I can know when I can listen to the Papal Magisterium again?

Image
In other words, Francis told el-Tayeb what he wanted to hear, and then told Bishop Schneider what he wanted to hear. He thus created space for plausible deniability for both parties.  This is behavior befitting a politician, not the Vicar of Christ, charged with confirming his brethren in the Faith.  But after six years of this sort of thing, can we expect anything else?
When Francis refused to answer the dubia of the Four Cardinals or the Filial Correction submitted to him by Fr. Hunwicke and many others, his silence in the face of attempted correction indicated, Fr. Hunwicke argues, that the Petrine Ministry had “entered into its current ‘temporary suspense’” and that “we are officially in a period in which the functions of the Papal Magisterium are in a vacatio which will be ended at the moment when the same Petrine Magisterial organ formally returns from dogmatic silence to the audible exercise of the functions rightly attributed to it in Catholic Tradition…”
It ought to be obvious …
Read more

Chirping Crickets and the Apostasy at Abu Dhabi: When is a Public Act of Apostasy a "Public Act of Apostasy"? Just Wondering.

Image
abu-dhabi-historic-document-signed-by-pope-francis-and-grand-imam-of-al-azhar

See Video Below:
https://youtu.be/F_prNq-EQSw

Dr. Chojnowski: I am still waiting for the document entitled "A Document on Human Fraternity For World Peace and Living Together" to have some real effect upon the "traditional world." Surely, it was a time for "profound reflection." A reflection that would be a summary of all the long train of outrages to the Catholic  Religion which have hit Catholics since October 28, 1958. Can it be true that we get a document which is intended to be published throughout the world and used as a constant source of academic and religious instruction, which rejects the fundamental understanding of the Catholic Church for 2,000 years, without it SIGNIFICANTLY changing or at least cementing in place our understanding of where we stand in this "crisis"? What we have with the document "On Human Fraternity" is a PUBLIC ACT OF APOSTASY. …
Read more

Fr. Josef Bisig Claims that Archbishop Lefebvre was a Private Sedevacantist; Kept Position Under Raps So as Not to "Scandalize" his SSPX Priests. See Gloria.tv Report here.

Image
“The See of Peter and the posts of authority in Rome being occupied by antichrists, the destruction of the Kingdom of Our Lord is being rapidly carried out even within His Mystical Body here below (…) This is what has brought down upon our heads persecution by the Rome of the antichrists.” (Letter to the future bishops, 29 August 1987)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2j1MIqYLwAY

Dr. Chojnowski: As you can see from this video and the interview with Fr. Bisig, the Fraternity of St. Peter is exactly how Fr. Poisson portrayed it in the interview published on this website. He sees himself as part and parcel of the Novus Ordo church and urges us to join. Time for another quote by Archbishop Lefebvre:
“To whatever extent pope, bishops, priests or faithful adhere to this new Church, they separate themselves from the Catholic Church.” (July 29, 1976, Reflections on the Suspension a divinis)
Read more

Gallicanism: Traditional Catholicism Without the Catholicism. Or Why Popes Matter.

Image
Lest we confuse when we sling the accusation of "Gallicanism" at those who continue to try to change the Church and the Faith in response to Francis and his abominations, we should define what we mean. Rather we will let Michael Miller, whose "Notes on Church History in France," were published in Dom Prosper Gueranger's book against Gallicanism, entitled, The Papal Monarchy, present the basic definition for us: "'Gallicanism' is a group of religious opinions which for some time was peculiar to the Church in France and the theological schools of that country. This view of the Church tended to restrict the authority of the pope, while extending the competence of the bishops and the temporal ruler."

"Gallican theory acknowledged papal primacy, but claimed that it was limited by the power of princes, by the authority of a general (ecumenical council), by the authority of the bishops, and by the canons and customs of local churches. According t…
Read more

Who are the Bad Fundamentalists that Francis and his Imam Friend Condemned as Evil in Abu Dhabi? I bet it was you!

Image
From the Zenit article on the Apostasy at Abu Dhabi:
https://zenit.org/articles/abu-dhabi-historic-document-signed-by-pope-francis-and-grand-imam-of-al-azhar/

Earlier today, Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin told journalists, including Zenit’s Deborah Lubov, that the importance of this day is dialogue among religions, especially Christianity and Islam, promoting peace and combatting fundamentalism.

Dr. Chojnowski: Have you wondered yet who are these "fundamentalists" who are the main source of evil in our world, the evil ones who are keeping the world from realizing a utopian existence of equality, fraternity, gender equity, and dialogue? I would bet that every one who is now reading this website would be fit into that category by not only the ridiculous women pictured above but by Francis the Apostate and his Imam "fellow believer." What is important here is how "official" it all is. The above statement about "dialogue among religions&…
Read more