Announcement 2019: Sworn Declaration from Handwriting Analyst Demonstrates that Sister Lucy II was Imposter. Vatican-Released Third Secret text Proven to be Authentic and Consistent with Memoirs of Sister Lucy I.

                                                True and False Sister Lucy. 
                                 Is there a "Fourth Secret"?
   
Dr. Chojnowski: As we try to figure out how best to post the Handwriting Experts Sworn Declaration which indicates that the handwriting of Sister Lucy post-1958 is NOT consistent with the handwriting of Sister Lucy pre-1958 --- hence indicating forgery and doing much to verify the judgment that the post-1958 Sister Lucy was an imposter --- I want to give my readers the heads up as to what was found in a very brief form. The entire 114 page declaration will be available as soon as we are able. The report indicates:

1) The writing of "Sister Lucy" in 1969 was NOT consistent with the writings of Sister Lucy in her memoirs form the 20s, 30s, and 40s, indicating forgery and an imposter operating at the time.
2) The Third Secret text dating from 1944, released by the Vatican in 2000, was AUTHENTIC AND CONSISTENT WITH THE 20s, 30s, and 40s, writings of Sister Lucy I. Although this is not stated in the declaration, it would seem to open up the possibility or even likelihood, as has been put forward by figures such as Antonio Socci, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, and Christopher Ferrara, that there is a "Fourth Secret," which has not been released yet by the Vatican, which would be Our Lady's words which explain and give the message that were meant to accompany the vision apparently given to the Children of Fatima on July 13, 1917. The first two Secrets have accompanying messages explaining the visions, why does the Third not? 

The investigator has indicated that this declaration has done much to move forward the Sister Lucy Truth investigation. Keep checking back for the posted handwriting declaration, for the link to the new evidentiary website, and for the further scientific reports with will address the Sister Lucy I and II question from all different scientific perspectives.

Comments

Popular Posts

SSPX Accuses Francis of Heresy. As Far as I can tell, a "Document for Human Fraternity" that was intended to be spread throughout the world and bore the signature of Francis is a Public Act. No? So Francis is a Public Heretic or Public Apostate, No?

Modernist Pope or Gallican Lawyer? Because Francis Did Not Answer the "Filial Correction" SIGNED BY CHRIS FERRARA --- He is SUSPENDED! Operation of the Papal Magisterium will depend upon Chris and Fr. Hunwicke determining that it has "formally return[ed] from dogmatic silence to the audible exercise of the functions rightly attributed to it in Catholic Tradition." Can someone put me on the email list so that I can know when I can listen to the Papal Magisterium again?

Chirping Crickets and the Apostasy at Abu Dhabi: When is a Public Act of Apostasy a "Public Act of Apostasy"? Just Wondering.

Gallicanism: Traditional Catholicism Without the Catholicism. Or Why Popes Matter.

Who are the Bad Fundamentalists that Francis and his Imam Friend Condemned as Evil in Abu Dhabi? I bet it was you!

Obama's Hell-Ride to War on Iran

Fr. Hewko gives Dubious Ordinations of Fr. Poisson and Power of Pablo as Reasons for Leaving Boston, Kentucky. Affirms Commitment to "Catholic Resistance".