Surprise, Surprise, Surprise....And, Yet, One Must be a Part of the "Tin-Foil Hat Crowd," to Quote Chris Ferrara to think that These Same People Substituted Someone Else for a Cloistered Nun that came out every 15 years or so.

Comments

  1. Rose ArieOctober 26, 2018 at 5:11 AM

    Ya well he didn’t believe Robert Sungenis either before he actually did the research, as per his own words. It’s a knee jerk reaction to behave the way he is. He’s just afraid of being made fun of by the group he’s trying to cater to. Guess he’s just a slow learner but a fast talker. I pray he wakes up. We have to get used to ridicule unfortunately.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousOctober 26, 2018 at 9:10 AM

    It is amazing that Chris will quote Sochi at every opportunity and gush over his every article.
    Sochi a convert from the mid 90´s a darling of Italian TV and admitted Medjugorge fan and anti-Fatima suddenly overnight supposedly writes a book on Fatima and becomes the go to guy for all things Fatima. Really? Chris should ask himself why Pope Francis wrote Sochi personal notes or letters as if Sochi´s anti-Francis diatribe was just a fake show because it probably is. What do Pope Francis and Sochi have in common Chris?

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousOctober 26, 2018 at 12:58 PM

    The regular Trad crowd has been ahead of the curve most of the time. With that a "I told you so" attitude has come a sense of smugness bordering on arrogance. What you are doing with the Sister Lucy Truth project not only could have but should have been done a long time ago. Why was it not done? ...Maybe just gullible or lazy and/or just didn't want to know. Whatever reason is not important. What is important is the Truth and to get to the bottom of this scandal. No time for pettiness. Great work. Game changer.

    ReplyDelete
  4. elpine flowerNovember 20, 2018 at 1:45 PM

    My question is ( and I remember reading and hearing it at the time), is why was Sr Lucia reportedly crying when Carlos Evaristo, of suspicious repute (and I am not quoting Grunerites here , I am quoting people I whom I spoke to who both visited and lived in Fatima ), when he led her by the hand up to meet Pope Paul the 6th ?
    At first Evaristo worked in collaboration with the late Fr
    Gruner and then after he was hired by John Haffert of the Blue Army, he became his bitter enemy.
    Why did Carlos Evaristo suddenly switch gears sos much so as to having been given living quarters in Ourem Castle and then to become close friends with a priest from a wealthy family in CA who owned and ran a small luxury hotel for Pilgrims?
    Richard Salbato from CA who allegedly retired in Fatima and was also friends with Evaristo at first , left after a bitter fallout with the him and it was all recorded on the internet by Salbato himself. Salbato claimed the same hotel owner priest was dying of AIDS .
    Michael Sallabario aka "Miguel de Portugal" was another man from the US who worked with Fr Gruner and Evaristo and who himself left Portugal in bitterness and anger . He started a website called the M+G+R foundation....
    What is it about Fatima that turned friends into such bitter enemies ? Was it all about money?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Amazon Facial Recognition Technology Determines that Sister Lucy I and Sister Lucy II are not the Same Person. Not One Match Amidst Thousands of Comparisons.

Image
Begin forwarded message:
 "NOT EQUAL".The above message was sent to Sister Lucy Truth as the announcement of the result of the Amazon Facial Recognition Test. All of the data, with pictures and percentage identified similarity and matches to be released along with Investigators report soon. A further summary of all the data from this test will be released by Sister Lucy Truth in the coming weeks.
Watch the Youtube below about this latest Amazon technology that is being used by police departments all over the nation. 










Read more

Sister Lucy Truth Update: Michigan State Facial Recognition Lab Finds that Sister Lucy II (post-1967) was NOT Sister Lucy I (pre-1967). How Much Do We Need to Put Out Until the Crickets Stop Chirping?

Image
We said that we look at the case in a scientific way and we have. This weekend, we will publish on sisterlucyimposter.org the facial recognition report about Sister Lucy I and II. Michigan State University is the only university in the United States with a facial recognition lab, and Dr. Arun Ross is a leading professional in that field, see his biographical page at https://www.egr.msu.edu/people/profile/rossarun.

Although all of the mysteries surrounding the disappearance of the real Sister Lucy have not, by any means, been settled, it has been exactly one year since scientific facial recognition analysis identified the imposter and in order to further investigate the apparent replacement and to further seek to establish the fact, at least 4 other facial recognition tests were commissioned using a variety of the latest programs and algorithms. Other analysis was done on the pictures, by orthodontists, plastic surgeons, dentists, forensic artists, private investigators, eye doctors and…
Read more

More Than Metaphor: Our Lady at La Salette seems to have told us not only THAT the Church would be in "Eclipse," but WHEN IT WOULD GO INTO ECLIPSE, October 27th, 1958.

Image
"The Church Will Be In Eclipse"
                 Eclipse? October 27, 1958.
                Gives You Chills and Tears.


This gives me the chills. Thanks to the new book by Dr. Taylor Marshall and by the research of an invaluable co-worker at Sister Lucy Truth, it has come to my attention that not only was Our Lady's words at La Salette about the fact that the "Church will be in Eclipse" --- there, but darkened and seemingly not there, for a "moment" (read, at least 60 years and running) --- but that Our Lady seems to have indicated to us the actual exact time in which such an "eclipse" would happen. During an eclipse over Rome! Of course, as we know, or at least as we should know, on the previous day, October 26th, 1958, the Feast of Christ the King, there was 5 minutes of white smoke that came bellowing from the Conclave that was electing a successor of Pope Pius XII. This went so far that Vatican media had announced that a pope was elected. N…
Read more

Long-Standing Fatima "Consecration of Russia" Narrative Implodes as Handwriting Expert Demonstrates 1980 Letter from "Sister Lucy" to Fr. Umberto Pasquale is Definitely a Forgery. Whatever the Real Sister Lucy Knew about the Requested Consecration of Russia DOES NOT Appear in this Letter. Fatima Center, Are You Listening? Report from Bart Baggett to be Posted Imminently.

Image
On April 13, 1980, Sister Lucy replied to Fr. Umberto's question regarding the form of consecration that Our Lady of Fatima requested:
Link to a now disproven Fatima, Sister Lucy, and Consecration of Russia Narrative: https://www.nuestrasenoradelasrosas.org/news1/SisterLucyConsecrationOfRussia.htm
Read more

ALERT: World-Class Handwriting Analyst Demonstrates that the Writings of "Sister Lucy" from after 1957 Were Forgeries. Analysis of "Third Secret" Released by Vatican in 2000, Forged 1969 Letter Urging Obedience and Submission to Paul VI, Signatures on Letters from 1967 and 1969, Letter about Consecration of Russia From 1980, and Manuscript Released by Carmelites of Coimbra and Used as the Basis for Sister Lucy's Official Biography Published by the Blue Army WERE ALL FORGERIES. Follow the Links to the Sworn Testimony Below.

Image
https://sisterlucyimposter.org/handwriting-analysis/

New and Revised Analysis Comparing Known and Excepted Handwriting Samples form Sister Lucy to the Letter Written in November of 1969, in which complete obedience to Paul VI's revolutionary actions in the Church is urged. Analyst certifies that the "Third Secret" (written in 1944) released by the Vatican IS consistent with the known Sister Lucy's handwritings, leaving open the possibility of a "Fourth Secret." https://sisterlucyimposter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/BaggettOpinionPacket-Extrc-Revised2.pdf
Sworn testimony and analysis of "Manuscript of Sister Lucy" which served as the basis, put forward as authentic by the Carmelites of Coimbra, for Sister Lucy's official biography. This cleverly done forgery was published by the Blue Army.                                  Scroll Down to Report #2 https://sisterlucyimposter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/BaggettOpinionPacket-Extrc-Revised2.pdf
Sign…
Read more

Revised and Updated Edition of Handwriting Analyst Declaration in which 1969 Letter of "Sister Lucy" Advocating Submission to Paul VI is Proven to be a Forgery. Soon to be Released on SisterLucyimposter.org. Includes Analysis of the Purported Third Secret Released in 2000. Socci's "4th Secret" Looking More Plausible. Folks, if Sister Lucy was around in 1969, she would have been able to write her own letters.

Image
The letter which Bart Baggett has definitively analyzed, translated above, has proven to be a cleverly attempted FORGERY. Obviously, Paul VI had not finished using the persona of "Sister Lucy" to shut down opposition to his agenda after May 13th, 1967. Notice that in a letter of thanks to a man who gave a gift to the convent of Coimbra, she spends 80% of the letter telling you to obey probably the greatest revolutionary and Modernist in the history of the Catholic Church. Rather than being the leader of the opposition or should we say "prophet of doom," "Sister Lucy" 1969 is Paul VI's greatest defender, urging complete obedience to one who speaks for God and to object to whom means that you are separated from the Vine of the Catholic Church and face the Fires of Hell. The importance of this find cannot be overstated. 

The Revised version of the legal declaration by Mr. Bart Baggett will be released shortly on sisterlucyimposter.org 


Read more