Archbishop Lefebvre Said that Paul VI Knew Exactly What He Was Doing When He Launched the Revolution in the Church. Did He Know What He Was Doing When He Met With "Sister Lucy"? Why does this Video Only Have 255 Hits?


Comments

  1. "Systematic destruction of the Church" "Implemented". Hear! Hear! Freemasonry! Hear! Hear! And later on in the video some brilliant reasoning, and maybe his "election is invalid". Hear! Hear! Folks, if you have never read who is and who is not valid for election to the Papacy, know now that no heretic either material or otherwise was ever considered valid for election nor ever will be. He did not lose office (even though heretics do lose it), it was never even his in the first place. Read "Bergoglio has got nothing to lose". Now, did you notice that Archbishop Lefebvre said "Yes ultimately I agree with you that it's not possible that the Pope who is protected by the Holy Ghost could do things like this..." But then not long after he says..."I don't say that is what is going on." This is typical of the Pontius Pilate attitude of Archbishop Lefebvre and this is why it is said that he zigs and zags. Either it is possible for a Pope to do those things or it is not, and the "in between" situation created by the SSPX can never be. That is why the SSPX will not last to the end of time, but the Catholic Church will. Those in the SSPX must either join the true Catholic Church, which is those who believe that the Church CANNOT teach a new "faith" or lose the faith forever due to a habitual disobedience which they will apply to a future true Pope. One thing I know, and that is I would rather shed my blood for the faith than attend one Mass offered "una cum" with that filthy antichrist and his circus in the Vatican.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What heresy did Pope Paul VI state publicly before he was elected to the papacy?

      Delete
    2. I was referring to Bergoglio who was a heretic before his election as per his book with the Jew Rabbi Skorka where he denied unchanging dogma. However, as far as Paul VI goes, he promulgated Vatican II with all the bishops. It is impossible for a Pope and all the bishops to promulgate heresy to the entire Church as general councils are guided by the Holy Ghost (despite SSPX mythology on the matter). However, his Council said that the Catholic Church merely subsists in a much bigger (one-world) Church that is made up of all the "churches" such as Lutherans, Anglicans and all Protestant groups and even Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims who "worship the same God" etc. That these religions are a means of salvation, that the college of bishops is rules equally with the pope (collegiality) and other heretical statements. What I would ask re Paul VI is did he ever shows signs of actually believing in the Catholic faith before his election as one needs to "be baptised AND profess the Catholic faith" to be a Catholic. But if someone can show me he did believe in the Catholic faith perhaps we could believe he was pope for a minute before he lost his office due to canon 188 #4 (google excellent Dryden/Dolan article on this) and Cum Ex Apostolatus, which, contrary to further untruths on the part of SSPX was put into Canon Law and therefore was NOT abrogated with all those Bulls and briefs that were not put into the code. See the footnotes for canon 188 #4 which show it is in the code. SSPX are continually untruthful on these points. They also switch from speaking of 1917 code as if they still believed it to be valid (are they sedevacantist like me?) to officially accepting 1983 code in all documents submitted to the Vatican. Fr David Pagliarani, if you are reading this, you must choose one, you can't have it both ways.

      Delete
  2. The third secret must be a chastisement of the Church. The Vatican II heresy and her popes are the outward signs of Satan being allowed to infiltrate the church. It is easy to see how the world has evolved away from Christ in such a rapid manner since 1960. It has been estimated that over 1 billion abortions have been preformed world wide since 1960 . The Chastisement is the loss of valid sacraments and valid Priests add to that the succession of anti popes that have usurped Peter's throne since 1958 and you have the basis of the third secret. The church is in the catacombs and only a supernatural event can bring Her out into the light. It is all the more apparent that Sister Lucy was silenced some time after Roncalli usurped the throne otherwise she would have spoken abut the heresy of Vatican II. The faithful await the hand of God to move against those who have caused so much harm to His bride and His sheep. We pray that His will be done as soon as possible and the Church be restored and strengthened to reach all the lost sheep of the world and bring them all into her loving fold free of heresy and schism .

    ReplyDelete
  3. We should also go a facial recognition on Paul VI, as well as voice recognition. I have seen some photos, and it appears there may have been a double.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you will find it is false. It seems to have been propagated by the "Bayside" apparitionists and Bayside seems to have been a false apparition. Let us know if you find otherwise, but that idea of the two Paul VI's has been around for decades.

      Delete
    2. Yes, I know the thought has been around particularly from Bayside. I was never for Bayside, but the devil is known for discrediting good things by associating them with the bad. Still, nobody has verified this allegation yet, and it can be now, now that the technology is here both for facial recognition and voice recognition.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Amazon Facial Recognition Technology Determines that Sister Lucy I and Sister Lucy II are not the Same Person. Not One Match Amidst Thousands of Comparisons.

Sister Lucy Truth Update: Michigan State Facial Recognition Lab Finds that Sister Lucy II (post-1967) was NOT Sister Lucy I (pre-1967). How Much Do We Need to Put Out Until the Crickets Stop Chirping?

More Than Metaphor: Our Lady at La Salette seems to have told us not only THAT the Church would be in "Eclipse," but WHEN IT WOULD GO INTO ECLIPSE, October 27th, 1958.

Long-Standing Fatima "Consecration of Russia" Narrative Implodes as Handwriting Expert Demonstrates 1980 Letter from "Sister Lucy" to Fr. Umberto Pasquale is Definitely a Forgery. Whatever the Real Sister Lucy Knew about the Requested Consecration of Russia DOES NOT Appear in this Letter. Fatima Center, Are You Listening? Report from Bart Baggett to be Posted Imminently.

ALERT: World-Class Handwriting Analyst Demonstrates that the Writings of "Sister Lucy" from after 1957 Were Forgeries. Analysis of "Third Secret" Released by Vatican in 2000, Forged 1969 Letter Urging Obedience and Submission to Paul VI, Signatures on Letters from 1967 and 1969, Letter about Consecration of Russia From 1980, and Manuscript Released by Carmelites of Coimbra and Used as the Basis for Sister Lucy's Official Biography Published by the Blue Army WERE ALL FORGERIES. Follow the Links to the Sworn Testimony Below.

...una cum famulo tuo Michahel Matt et Christophorus Ferrara....Isn't it Strange How Francis Could Watch Athanasius Schneider Participate in the Matt/FSSP Catholic Identity Crisis Conference, without Censure or Disciplinary Action, Even Though Matt has Said that the "Remnant" "No longer accepts the Vatican of Pope Francis as a moral authority in ANYTHING." Strange. Just Sayin'

Revised and Updated Edition of Handwriting Analyst Declaration in which 1969 Letter of "Sister Lucy" Advocating Submission to Paul VI is Proven to be a Forgery. Soon to be Released on SisterLucyimposter.org. Includes Analysis of the Purported Third Secret Released in 2000. Socci's "4th Secret" Looking More Plausible. Folks, if Sister Lucy was around in 1969, she would have been able to write her own letters.