Rev. Sam Osborne, Mysteries of the Mass, Gnosticon 4, Sept. 18th 2021. An Explanation of the Gnostic Rite of "Mass" that Leads Us to Wonder Why this Intentional Mass of the Albigensian, Manichean, and Gnostic Heretics is Almost Identical to the New Mass of the Masonic Paul VI.
From the recent Gnosticon. We ask ourselves the question as to why this ritual, intentionally heretical and invoking all the major heretics of the distant past --- resembles so much the Novus Ordo Missae of the Masonic Paul VI, both in the ritual itself, the attitude of the celebrant (I think he would be classified as a "reverent" "conservative" "priest" --- by our friends on EWTN), and in the naturalistic Teilhardian theology articulated by the "priest." Could it be that the effective banning of the "Latin Mass" is payback by people associated with this Kabbalistic sect for the "burning of the Cathars," who are mentioned here as "saints"? The rejection of vicarious atonement by these heretics is very interesting, since we see the same thing in the theology of the Neo-Modernist heretic Josef Ratzinger. It is not the Body and Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ that is offered by these Neo-Manicheans, but rather the "
"Systematic destruction of the Church" "Implemented". Hear! Hear! Freemasonry! Hear! Hear! And later on in the video some brilliant reasoning, and maybe his "election is invalid". Hear! Hear! Folks, if you have never read who is and who is not valid for election to the Papacy, know now that no heretic either material or otherwise was ever considered valid for election nor ever will be. He did not lose office (even though heretics do lose it), it was never even his in the first place. Read "Bergoglio has got nothing to lose". Now, did you notice that Archbishop Lefebvre said "Yes ultimately I agree with you that it's not possible that the Pope who is protected by the Holy Ghost could do things like this..." But then not long after he says..."I don't say that is what is going on." This is typical of the Pontius Pilate attitude of Archbishop Lefebvre and this is why it is said that he zigs and zags. Either it is possible for a Pope to do those things or it is not, and the "in between" situation created by the SSPX can never be. That is why the SSPX will not last to the end of time, but the Catholic Church will. Those in the SSPX must either join the true Catholic Church, which is those who believe that the Church CANNOT teach a new "faith" or lose the faith forever due to a habitual disobedience which they will apply to a future true Pope. One thing I know, and that is I would rather shed my blood for the faith than attend one Mass offered "una cum" with that filthy antichrist and his circus in the Vatican.ReplyDelete
What heresy did Pope Paul VI state publicly before he was elected to the papacy?Delete
I was referring to Bergoglio who was a heretic before his election as per his book with the Jew Rabbi Skorka where he denied unchanging dogma. However, as far as Paul VI goes, he promulgated Vatican II with all the bishops. It is impossible for a Pope and all the bishops to promulgate heresy to the entire Church as general councils are guided by the Holy Ghost (despite SSPX mythology on the matter). However, his Council said that the Catholic Church merely subsists in a much bigger (one-world) Church that is made up of all the "churches" such as Lutherans, Anglicans and all Protestant groups and even Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims who "worship the same God" etc. That these religions are a means of salvation, that the college of bishops is rules equally with the pope (collegiality) and other heretical statements. What I would ask re Paul VI is did he ever shows signs of actually believing in the Catholic faith before his election as one needs to "be baptised AND profess the Catholic faith" to be a Catholic. But if someone can show me he did believe in the Catholic faith perhaps we could believe he was pope for a minute before he lost his office due to canon 188 #4 (google excellent Dryden/Dolan article on this) and Cum Ex Apostolatus, which, contrary to further untruths on the part of SSPX was put into Canon Law and therefore was NOT abrogated with all those Bulls and briefs that were not put into the code. See the footnotes for canon 188 #4 which show it is in the code. SSPX are continually untruthful on these points. They also switch from speaking of 1917 code as if they still believed it to be valid (are they sedevacantist like me?) to officially accepting 1983 code in all documents submitted to the Vatican. Fr David Pagliarani, if you are reading this, you must choose one, you can't have it both ways.Delete
The third secret must be a chastisement of the Church. The Vatican II heresy and her popes are the outward signs of Satan being allowed to infiltrate the church. It is easy to see how the world has evolved away from Christ in such a rapid manner since 1960. It has been estimated that over 1 billion abortions have been preformed world wide since 1960 . The Chastisement is the loss of valid sacraments and valid Priests add to that the succession of anti popes that have usurped Peter's throne since 1958 and you have the basis of the third secret. The church is in the catacombs and only a supernatural event can bring Her out into the light. It is all the more apparent that Sister Lucy was silenced some time after Roncalli usurped the throne otherwise she would have spoken abut the heresy of Vatican II. The faithful await the hand of God to move against those who have caused so much harm to His bride and His sheep. We pray that His will be done as soon as possible and the Church be restored and strengthened to reach all the lost sheep of the world and bring them all into her loving fold free of heresy and schism .ReplyDelete
We should also go a facial recognition on Paul VI, as well as voice recognition. I have seen some photos, and it appears there may have been a double.ReplyDelete
I think you will find it is false. It seems to have been propagated by the "Bayside" apparitionists and Bayside seems to have been a false apparition. Let us know if you find otherwise, but that idea of the two Paul VI's has been around for decades.Delete
Yes, I know the thought has been around particularly from Bayside. I was never for Bayside, but the devil is known for discrediting good things by associating them with the bad. Still, nobody has verified this allegation yet, and it can be now, now that the technology is here both for facial recognition and voice recognition.Delete