Another "Twilight Zone" Photo of "Sister Lucy" with Paul VI on May 13, 1967. He seems to be bending down to listen to her words. She is actually not even present in this scene. My theory is that the Vatican was not confident in the substitution so such close ups were discouraged.



Another Doctored Photo from 1967.

I owe a commentator on Cathoinfo for the first two photos. They are exactly in line with the faked photo I have posted on our last few blog posts. For his post and for the original site see below. A friend and collaborator of Sister Lucy Truth also has a video in which this doctored picture is portrayed on the walls of the Fatima Shrine portraying the life of Sister Lucy.
 
original-photo-of-'the-meeting'-between-paul-vi-and-'sister-lucy'-found!

fatima.htm

If Sister Lucy II was "actually" there --- and why wouldn't she be, it was her first "appearance" --- why would you need doctored photos of the event? Was the Vatican a bit insecure in the apparent fraud at the time and only created "close-ups" of the two together later on when the powers that be decided that the substitution had worked?

P.S., A friend of mine has indicated that he thought the videos of my many lectures and interviews sponsored by the Fatima Center had been taken down. True? 

Here is the apparent source picture for Sister Lucy II of May 13, 1967.




Comments

  1. I really enjoyed your talks too! But I really feel that Father Gruner would be rolling over in his grave if he knew what they were doing over there. You, on the other hand, are doing the work of God. It is very important now more than ever to expose this fraud of the novus ordo once and for all. The church is the immaculate bride of Christ, and the novus ordo is the whore spoken of in the Book of Revelation

    ReplyDelete
  2. I remember watching a talk you gave about Benedict XVI and I can’t find it anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  3. look at her teeth. they dont belong to lucy 1 or lucy 2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These are entirely normal teeth which neither Lucy I nor Lucy II had!!

      Delete
    2. If that picture was taken in 1967, Sr. Lucy would be 60.
      This woman is not older than 40.

      Delete
  4. I cannot find your talk on the message of La Salette. One of the most powerful talks on the subject! This too was from one of the Fatima conferences.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

SSPX Accuses Francis of Heresy. As Far as I can tell, a "Document for Human Fraternity" that was intended to be spread throughout the world and bore the signature of Francis is a Public Act. No? So Francis is a Public Heretic or Public Apostate, No?

Modernist Pope or Gallican Lawyer? Because Francis Did Not Answer the "Filial Correction" SIGNED BY CHRIS FERRARA --- He is SUSPENDED! Operation of the Papal Magisterium will depend upon Chris and Fr. Hunwicke determining that it has "formally return[ed] from dogmatic silence to the audible exercise of the functions rightly attributed to it in Catholic Tradition." Can someone put me on the email list so that I can know when I can listen to the Papal Magisterium again?

Chirping Crickets and the Apostasy at Abu Dhabi: When is a Public Act of Apostasy a "Public Act of Apostasy"? Just Wondering.

Gallicanism: Traditional Catholicism Without the Catholicism. Or Why Popes Matter.

Who are the Bad Fundamentalists that Francis and his Imam Friend Condemned as Evil in Abu Dhabi? I bet it was you!

Obama's Hell-Ride to War on Iran