Another "Twilight Zone" Photo of "Sister Lucy" with Paul VI on May 13, 1967. He seems to be bending down to listen to her words. She is actually not even present in this scene. My theory is that the Vatican was not confident in the substitution so such close ups were discouraged.



Another Doctored Photo from 1967.

I owe a commentator on Cathoinfo for the first two photos. They are exactly in line with the faked photo I have posted on our last few blog posts. For his post and for the original site see below. A friend and collaborator of Sister Lucy Truth also has a video in which this doctored picture is portrayed on the walls of the Fatima Shrine portraying the life of Sister Lucy.
 
original-photo-of-'the-meeting'-between-paul-vi-and-'sister-lucy'-found!

fatima.htm

If Sister Lucy II was "actually" there --- and why wouldn't she be, it was her first "appearance" --- why would you need doctored photos of the event? Was the Vatican a bit insecure in the apparent fraud at the time and only created "close-ups" of the two together later on when the powers that be decided that the substitution had worked?

P.S., A friend of mine has indicated that he thought the videos of my many lectures and interviews sponsored by the Fatima Center had been taken down. True? 

Here is the apparent source picture for Sister Lucy II of May 13, 1967.




Comments

  1. I really enjoyed your talks too! But I really feel that Father Gruner would be rolling over in his grave if he knew what they were doing over there. You, on the other hand, are doing the work of God. It is very important now more than ever to expose this fraud of the novus ordo once and for all. The church is the immaculate bride of Christ, and the novus ordo is the whore spoken of in the Book of Revelation

    ReplyDelete
  2. I remember watching a talk you gave about Benedict XVI and I can’t find it anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  3. look at her teeth. they dont belong to lucy 1 or lucy 2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These are entirely normal teeth which neither Lucy I nor Lucy II had!!

      Delete
    2. If that picture was taken in 1967, Sr. Lucy would be 60.
      This woman is not older than 40.

      Delete
  4. I cannot find your talk on the message of La Salette. One of the most powerful talks on the subject! This too was from one of the Fatima conferences.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Sister Lucy's Smile: Sister Lucy I + New Teeth = Sister Lucy II. Right? Wrong. Look at the Evidence Here.

There WAS an Imposter. On the Day of the Miracle of the Sun, We Publish Our First of Many Expert Reports. A Plastic Surgeon's Judgment on the Case of the Two Sister Lucys.

The Blessed Emperor and the Tragic Fall of A Catholic Dynasty: Why Nobody Should Be Celebrating the End of World War I.

Dr. Chojnowski with the Latest on TradCat Knight!

Yawn! Nothing to See Here! The Fatima Center's Response to Reader's Inquiry About the Sister Lucy Truth Project.

Help Sister Lucy Truth Crack the Secret of the Third Secret: General Call for Writing Samples from "Sister Lucy".

Are you a Super Facial Recognizer? Take the Test and Be Involved in the Survey By the University of Greenwich