Another "Twilight Zone" Photo of "Sister Lucy" with Paul VI on May 13, 1967. He seems to be bending down to listen to her words. She is actually not even present in this scene. My theory is that the Vatican was not confident in the substitution so such close ups were discouraged.



Another Doctored Photo from 1967.

I owe a commentator on Cathoinfo for the first two photos. They are exactly in line with the faked photo I have posted on our last few blog posts. For his post and for the original site see below. A friend and collaborator of Sister Lucy Truth also has a video in which this doctored picture is portrayed on the walls of the Fatima Shrine portraying the life of Sister Lucy.
 
original-photo-of-'the-meeting'-between-paul-vi-and-'sister-lucy'-found!

fatima.htm

If Sister Lucy II was "actually" there --- and why wouldn't she be, it was her first "appearance" --- why would you need doctored photos of the event? Was the Vatican a bit insecure in the apparent fraud at the time and only created "close-ups" of the two together later on when the powers that be decided that the substitution had worked?

P.S., A friend of mine has indicated that he thought the videos of my many lectures and interviews sponsored by the Fatima Center had been taken down. True? 

Here is the apparent source picture for Sister Lucy II of May 13, 1967.




Comments

  1. I really enjoyed your talks too! But I really feel that Father Gruner would be rolling over in his grave if he knew what they were doing over there. You, on the other hand, are doing the work of God. It is very important now more than ever to expose this fraud of the novus ordo once and for all. The church is the immaculate bride of Christ, and the novus ordo is the whore spoken of in the Book of Revelation

    ReplyDelete
  2. I remember watching a talk you gave about Benedict XVI and I can’t find it anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  3. look at her teeth. they dont belong to lucy 1 or lucy 2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These are entirely normal teeth which neither Lucy I nor Lucy II had!!

      Delete
    2. If that picture was taken in 1967, Sr. Lucy would be 60.
      This woman is not older than 40.

      Delete
  4. I cannot find your talk on the message of La Salette. One of the most powerful talks on the subject! This too was from one of the Fatima conferences.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Francis Drives Neo-Traditionalists and Neo-Conservatives to Full Blown Gallicanism. Just Released Open Letter Accuses Francis of Formal and Public Heresy ---- Still Calls Him Pope ---- and demands that the "bishops of the Catholic Church" Depose Him if He Does Not Respond to and Obey Their Admonition.

"Paris will be burned" ---- Our Lady of La Salette: Collapsed Spire, Collapsed Catholic Civilization. How the Notre Dame Fire is an Image of the Real Church's Situation Today.

Frankenherring: Francis as Red Herring. Neo-Cons and Neo-Trads , Practicing Gallican Revivalism, Act as if There is Only One Cuckoo in the Cuckoo's Nest.

SSPX Rejects "Open Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church." Advises Neo-Con and Neo-Trad Signatories to Focus on Doctrinal Deviations of Francis and all Conciliar popes. Urges them to Seek Problem In Vatican II and Pre-Conciliar Modernism and Liberalism.

Prominent Remnant Writer Endorses Sister Lucy Truth Project! Thank You for Your Support Ann Barnhardt, We are Advancing to the Truth on All Fronts. The Evidence We are Collecting and Presenting to the World, Will Speak for Itself.