Original Photo of "the Meeting" between Paul VI and "Sister Lucy" found! TV Camera Stands Next to Paul VI. "Sister Lucy" Cut and Pasted In.

-


The Amazing Appearance of "Sister Lucy" 


Dr. Chojnowski: Due to the diligent work of a co-worker in the Sister Lucy Truth project, we have come up with the original picture of the first appearance of Sister Lucy II. As you can see by examining the two pictures, the TV camera still appears in the background of the superimposed "Sister Lucy". This was the faked picture that the plastic surgeon immediately recognized was "photoshopped." Sister Lucy II's face is slightly turned from the source photo, so as to make the eyes point in the proper direction. One of the strange things that can be noticed about Paul VI's arm is that in the faked picture, the fingers of his right hand are much farther away from his left sleeve than they are in the original photo. When you look at Sister Lucy II in this photo for a while the faked nature of the photo becomes perfectly clear. 

Below are the source photos from which the picture of Sister Lucy II was clearly taken. To prove that this is not simply some internet photoshopping, we present the official publication (Blue Army) in which one instance of the photo appears. 

Also, Supporters of Sister Lucy Truth: I have been away for the last couple of weeks at a location in which the internet is very sketchy. As I have mentioned at the beginning of this month, we are now busy putting together the professional reports from private investigators, facial recognition experts, plastic surgeons, a prosthodontist, and a ophthalmologist. 

When I started this effort I did not realize how much time it would take to produce these reports and collect them into a single file. I am dependent on their schedules --- which are tight. The working is being done. I will publish the results about this case as soon as I am able --- I realize it is late August. Please be generous in your support of Sister Lucy Truth. The bills are coming in. Nothing in this work, except the work of myself and some generous associates, is for free, unfortunately. In a way that is a good thing, since we know that we are getting professional analysis. 

I will publish the source pictures tomorrow, so that I can get this posting up without problems today.

Comments

  1. 0August 27, 2018 at 10:18 AM

    Wowzah! I know Heaven chose her a messenger for our times, little did we know Heaven made her a superhero as well!

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousAugust 27, 2018 at 11:33 AM

    The crowd in the background looks different and/or different facial expressions. What does this mean? Three different photos spliced together?

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownAugust 27, 2018 at 12:06 PM

    I was always suspicious of the photo. Great work.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The FreshmakerAugust 27, 2018 at 3:26 PM

    So we now have the source pic for Paul VI. This would indicate a composite of three separate photos taking into account the originals for the background and Sister Lucy, correct? Keep up the great work!

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousAugust 28, 2018 at 3:46 AM

    https://kevinsymonds.com/2018/08/22/doctored-photo-lucia/

    ReplyDelete
  6. MarionAugust 28, 2018 at 2:19 PM

    More photomontages and original source (photomontages published in 1967). See:

    https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/original-photo-of-'the-meeting'-between-paul-vi-and-'sister-lucy'-found!/msg624277/#msg624277

    ReplyDelete
  7. MarionAugust 28, 2018 at 2:26 PM

    The original photo of "Lúcia", pasted into the photo shown in the article:

    https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-jV7F0Tq0BTo/WmR6-q-2XVI/AAAAAAAACDM/-wyjBNafo-guwZ8RyBhQTzzW_l95n4osACLcBGAs/s1600/lu1.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  8. suzanneAugust 30, 2018 at 7:32 AM

    If you look at the background crowd, the people are also in different positions, so it looks like both Montini AND Sister Lucy were photoshopped in, or in the case of just jMontini moved around from the original photo

    ReplyDelete
  9. UnknownAugust 30, 2018 at 1:07 PM

    Not sure how but I have seen this photo many times over the years and I knew in the back of my mind it was baloney, something about it screams fake even if it's an old pre photoshop days photo. At least I think it's a pre photoshop days manual cut and paste job.

    ReplyDelete
  10. AnonymousSeptember 3, 2018 at 12:25 PM

    I help people get scientific papers published as part of my job. So I point out likely bones of contention. Could this be two images of taken at the same event? The columns in the background are different. Learning

    ReplyDelete
  11. AnonymousSeptember 4, 2018 at 9:22 AM

    To be extremely clear, and to slightly correct Dr. Chojnowski, the source photo is not the EXACT same photograph used in the fake. In other words, it's not the ACTUAL source photograph. Rather, it is a screenshot from the RTP archive video that depicts the exact second or two that the "fake photo" would have HAD to have been taken. The video is taken from ever so slightly a different angle than the angle of what was used as the source photo. This very slightly different angle explains why Paul VI's hands appear a small degree different.

    However, as is clear by now, "Sister Lucia" is completely absent from that particular moment in time. Paul VI WAS present. You can verify this reality by simply reviewing the RTP archive video here (see 29:02-29:08 mark): https://arquivos.rtp.pt/conteudos/paulo-vi-peregrino-de-fatima/

    In sum, we know "Sister Lucia" was there that day, but what is unknown is why they would widely use and disseminate these fake photographs instead of real images.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?

-
Image
  Here are the list of the 53 Cardinals who met in Rome for the Conclave in Rome in October 1958.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_electors_for_the_1958_papal_conclave Dr. Chojnowski: This telegraph from Ambassador Zellerbach (US ambassador to Italy) and the Secretary of State of the United States under the Eisenhower administration, John Foster Dulles is a clear path mark indicating to us what we should be looking for as regards the happenings in the 1958 papal conclave that met from October 25-28, exactly 2 weeks after this telegram to the US Secretary of State was written and sent.  What do we read in this telegram and why does it matter in our investigation into the fate of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima? We do not, as of yet, have a smoking gun telegram, but this one is clearly a picture of a double-barrel shot gun loaded, locked, safety off, aimed, and finger on the trigger communication. The US government seems an imminent "threat" and it is...
Read more

Sister Lucia assassinated? Hidden? Replaced? Fatima Center Acknowledges the Existence of a Imposter Sister Lucy. Huge Breakthrough for Sister Lucy Truth.

-
Image
Here is the Just Released Statement of the Fatima Center:  Pinned by The Fatima Center @TheFatimaCenter 3 hours ago The Fatima Center's position is that it has been established with reasonable certainty that the woman presenting herself as Sister Lucia in all known public photos from 1967 onward was not the true Lucia.
Read more

Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person.

-
Image
Sister Lucy I: Missing Sister Lucy II: Impostor I can now release the overall results of the facial recognition tests that have been performed using the most up to date technology available analyzed by the most sophisticated software technicians and organized and analyzed by an expert investigator. "The only thing similar was the habit" were the words I just heard from the investigator in our phone conversation about the result. More specifics on the technicalities of the result will follow this initial announcement. On advice, I will not yet reveal the names of the investigators, the names of the companies involved, or the names of the programs being used. They are the best. They are all working on a comprehensive and definite report on the results and this will be released in the coming weeks. I want to avoid any interference in the investigation. After the final facial recognition report is complete, the second phase of the investigation will be launched whi...
Read more