Best Video footage of the first time the Imposter Sister Lucy was put before the Public on May 13, 1967 and, also, Close-Up Footage of the Imposter Aged 70 or 80.

-



One interesting thing about this picture is that when the Plastic Surgeon was presented with all the file of pictures of Sister Lucy, he, without any prompting from us said, "This picture has been photoshopped." His analysis of this will be included in the report that will be issued.

Now for the videos:

Paul VI Meeting with "Sister Lucy" in Fatima on May 13, 1967. Here the deception is unrecognized by hundreds of thousands.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKtONtLvwvo

Here is the best close up video of the laughing, light-hearted, joking "Sister Lucy" who replaced the Real Sister Lucy, one of the "prophets of doom."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1278&v=GQf2IaPF9V4

Comments

  1. jAugust 18, 2018 at 7:33 PM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Michael DowdAugust 19, 2018 at 1:12 AM

    This story needs to be put in the hands of the MSM. It would be a good complement to the predatory homosexual priest and Bishop coverup scandal now being examined by the media. Two Sr. Lucies is clearly a cover-up of what is now taking place in the Church before our eyes and more confirmation of the truth of the 3rd secret regarding corruption and apostasy at the highest levels in the Church. It all fits together. This may be the divine intervention we have been praying for carried out in the mysterious ways of the Lord. Thanks be to God.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousAugust 19, 2018 at 12:15 PM

    Fatima center very good, except they sound preposterous when they call Vatican anti Council leaders popes

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousAugust 19, 2018 at 5:47 PM

    I watched the video. What a farce. Why would they put up this woman as Sr. Lucy?
    She has a certain haughtiness that the real Lucy never exhibited.
    So tragically sad what has happened to our Church.

    ReplyDelete
  5. SAugust 19, 2018 at 6:11 PM

    Fake Lucy = fake V2 Church

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousAugust 19, 2018 at 6:15 PM

    Looks like the evidence is conclusive. We have had a take out of the authentic Lucy. The hermetic-kabbalistic masonic thugs have been lusting after the rule of the RC church for a long time. With Roncalli-Montini and subsequent "popes" they got it. Need historical evidence and precedence? Get hold of a copy of the Alta Vendita or explore the 1903 election of Cardinal Rampolla, vetoed by Emperor Franz Joseph when he had the knowledge that Rampolla was a member of OTO. We barely got the great saint Sarto then. The enemy just doubled down, hid out, did something evil at the 58 conclave to give us Roncalli, Montini, and The Council. Everything since 58 has been unlawful, invalid and diabolical.

    ReplyDelete
  7. BobMAugust 20, 2018 at 9:16 AM

    Not only is the picture a photoshop, it is an *obvious* photoshop. I actually feel a little insulted that anyone would try to pass this off as authentic. As far as the assertion of the Two Sr. Lucies proposition I look forward to seeing the report. At this point I consider the evidence presented to date sufficient to make it worth my while to closely (and I mean very closely) examine the evidence presented in the report. I am a detail-oriented, in-the-weeds kind of engineer and really only consider primary source data. I am fascinated by the question of how we can really, really "know" something is true or whether that is even possible. Living as we do in a blizzard of lies and deception, I think the best we can do is to reduce the bounds of our uncertainty. I look for pursuing this case. I would assume that the individual(s) you have to selected to make the facial recognition assessment are at least somewhat competent, but they will have to "show your work" as my teachers used to say. I promise to try to avoid both Type 1 and Type 2 errors. Good hunting.

    ReplyDelete
  8. ToSAugust 20, 2018 at 5:25 PM

    It does look photoshopped... doesn't Lucia look like she was placed in the photo with an editor? Is that what your plastic surgeon saw?

    ReplyDelete
  9. UnknownAugust 22, 2018 at 6:40 AM

    I do agree Michael Dowd that the two Lucys story should be all over the mass media. I remember waiting for 1960 to learn what the third secret was. I used to tremble watching a TV show called : Zero 1960. Malachi Martin spoke about it a lot with Art Bell on national radio. So it was out there -- lots of people were waiting. But what did we get instead? A fake Lucy who told us everything was fine. The whole world needs to know about the deception and betrayal of the Mother of God's warning.

    What we see today is all God's timing. He has taken charge of the clergy mess. He will take charge of this. As it says in today's reading of Ezechial 34:1-11: I myself will look after and tend my sheep.

    ReplyDelete
  10. UnknownAugust 22, 2018 at 9:45 PM

    Where was supposedly Sister Lucy from 1958 to 1967? If she was completely in hiding during a period of 9 years people should had totally forgotten her face. The impostor had 9 years to prepare her act. This sounds dumb but I always thought she looked way younger than her age. She died almost 100 years old but her face was like she was 75...

    ReplyDelete
  11. SAugust 26, 2018 at 3:59 AM

    How is this not headline news yet? Fake lucy = fake church.

    ReplyDelete
  12. SAugust 27, 2018 at 3:54 AM

    Thats what I'm talk'n about.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?

-
Image
  Here are the list of the 53 Cardinals who met in Rome for the Conclave in Rome in October 1958.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_electors_for_the_1958_papal_conclave Dr. Chojnowski: This telegraph from Ambassador Zellerbach (US ambassador to Italy) and the Secretary of State of the United States under the Eisenhower administration, John Foster Dulles is a clear path mark indicating to us what we should be looking for as regards the happenings in the 1958 papal conclave that met from October 25-28, exactly 2 weeks after this telegram to the US Secretary of State was written and sent.  What do we read in this telegram and why does it matter in our investigation into the fate of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima? We do not, as of yet, have a smoking gun telegram, but this one is clearly a picture of a double-barrel shot gun loaded, locked, safety off, aimed, and finger on the trigger communication. The US government seems an imminent "threat" and it is...
Read more

Sister Lucia assassinated? Hidden? Replaced? Fatima Center Acknowledges the Existence of a Imposter Sister Lucy. Huge Breakthrough for Sister Lucy Truth.

-
Image
Here is the Just Released Statement of the Fatima Center:  Pinned by The Fatima Center @TheFatimaCenter 3 hours ago The Fatima Center's position is that it has been established with reasonable certainty that the woman presenting herself as Sister Lucia in all known public photos from 1967 onward was not the true Lucia.
Read more

Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person.

-
Image
Sister Lucy I: Missing Sister Lucy II: Impostor I can now release the overall results of the facial recognition tests that have been performed using the most up to date technology available analyzed by the most sophisticated software technicians and organized and analyzed by an expert investigator. "The only thing similar was the habit" were the words I just heard from the investigator in our phone conversation about the result. More specifics on the technicalities of the result will follow this initial announcement. On advice, I will not yet reveal the names of the investigators, the names of the companies involved, or the names of the programs being used. They are the best. They are all working on a comprehensive and definite report on the results and this will be released in the coming weeks. I want to avoid any interference in the investigation. After the final facial recognition report is complete, the second phase of the investigation will be launched whi...
Read more