Two "Sister Lucys" Standing Side-By Side in 1967? Check out the latest Pictures. Also, I am putting out a call for high-definition Pictures of "Sister Lucy" from any time period of her "life." Please send now. Top Facial Recognition Experts in the Country Are Beginning their Work.

Send all high-definition pictures to justicepc@yahoo.com






You see here two women, both identified as "Sister Lucy" in various publications standing side by side with one another. Never mind what either of them has to do with the two women identified as "Sister Lucy" below.



Comments

  1. Antonio VicenteJune 16, 2018 at 2:04 PM

    Pedro Manuel Marto no es el padre sino él tío (oncle) de Lucía, esposo de Olimpia dos Santos, hermana de Antonio dos Santos, padre de Lucía dos Santos. No hay parecido con la anciana monja de La foto, ni tiene por qué haberlo.
    See https://moimunanblog.com/2018/06/16/misterio-insondable-fotos-de-las-dos-tres-o-cuatro-lucias/

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousJune 16, 2018 at 3:08 PM

    The nun in the top photo is the nun next to Sr Lucia in the bottom photo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Terry MJune 20, 2018 at 5:25 PM

      Good catch. When I looked at the pics I didn't notice the older nun to the right of the 1967 Sister Lucy. However, I knew immediately it was a misidentification on the part of the newspaper. The nun looks nothing like Sister Lucy and appears much older than 60. Also, the alleged Sister Lucy of 1967 next to her looks much younger than age 60. So neither of them can be the real Sister Lucy.

      Delete
  3. AnonymousJune 18, 2018 at 2:55 PM

    Here are some photos of Sr Lucia reportedly from 1948 and 1951.

    See link: http://www.maroon.dti.ne.jp/gokyo/diary2013/d-2013-07-03.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousJune 19, 2018 at 10:08 AM

    Correction to the above post: 1949 and 1951 are the reported dates not 1948.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mrs. O.July 9, 2018 at 11:33 PM

    I think the older nun is also the one on the right in the photo in this link:
    https://web.archive.org/web/20081204130535/http://www.santuario-fatima.pt/portal/index.php?id=11682&page=2

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

SSPX Accuses Francis of Heresy. As Far as I can tell, a "Document for Human Fraternity" that was intended to be spread throughout the world and bore the signature of Francis is a Public Act. No? So Francis is a Public Heretic or Public Apostate, No?

Image
https://fsspx.news/en/news-events/news/communiqué-superior-general-society-saint-pius-x-true-fraternity-45364?utm_source=Society+of+Saint+Pius+X+%7C+Newsletter&utm_campaign=3040eb7593-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_02_25_04_43&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_8c13eb2341-3040eb7593-206071633

I want to comment soon on the various statements that Michael Matt has made on the "situation" of the "crisis." However, before than we cannot let pass the just released statement by the SSPX on the apostasy of Francis at Abu Dhabi in which he signed a document which states that God willed the diversity of religions. Since this is a denial of the very essence of the Christian faith insofar as he is rejecting the whole purpose of the Church and the very idea of a unique Divine Revelation, originating with the preaching of the Incarnate Word and complemented by the revelation given to the Apostles by the Holy Ghost, I would argue that this is an act of apostasy. This act and such state…
Read more

Modernist Pope or Gallican Lawyer? Because Francis Did Not Answer the "Filial Correction" SIGNED BY CHRIS FERRARA --- He is SUSPENDED! Operation of the Papal Magisterium will depend upon Chris and Fr. Hunwicke determining that it has "formally return[ed] from dogmatic silence to the audible exercise of the functions rightly attributed to it in Catholic Tradition." Can someone put me on the email list so that I can know when I can listen to the Papal Magisterium again?

Image
In other words, Francis told el-Tayeb what he wanted to hear, and then told Bishop Schneider what he wanted to hear. He thus created space for plausible deniability for both parties.  This is behavior befitting a politician, not the Vicar of Christ, charged with confirming his brethren in the Faith.  But after six years of this sort of thing, can we expect anything else?
When Francis refused to answer the dubia of the Four Cardinals or the Filial Correction submitted to him by Fr. Hunwicke and many others, his silence in the face of attempted correction indicated, Fr. Hunwicke argues, that the Petrine Ministry had “entered into its current ‘temporary suspense’” and that “we are officially in a period in which the functions of the Papal Magisterium are in a vacatio which will be ended at the moment when the same Petrine Magisterial organ formally returns from dogmatic silence to the audible exercise of the functions rightly attributed to it in Catholic Tradition…”
It ought to be obvious …
Read more

Chirping Crickets and the Apostasy at Abu Dhabi: When is a Public Act of Apostasy a "Public Act of Apostasy"? Just Wondering.

Image
abu-dhabi-historic-document-signed-by-pope-francis-and-grand-imam-of-al-azhar

See Video Below:
https://youtu.be/F_prNq-EQSw

Dr. Chojnowski: I am still waiting for the document entitled "A Document on Human Fraternity For World Peace and Living Together" to have some real effect upon the "traditional world." Surely, it was a time for "profound reflection." A reflection that would be a summary of all the long train of outrages to the Catholic  Religion which have hit Catholics since October 28, 1958. Can it be true that we get a document which is intended to be published throughout the world and used as a constant source of academic and religious instruction, which rejects the fundamental understanding of the Catholic Church for 2,000 years, without it SIGNIFICANTLY changing or at least cementing in place our understanding of where we stand in this "crisis"? What we have with the document "On Human Fraternity" is a PUBLIC ACT OF APOSTASY. …
Read more

Fr. Josef Bisig Claims that Archbishop Lefebvre was a Private Sedevacantist; Kept Position Under Raps So as Not to "Scandalize" his SSPX Priests. See Gloria.tv Report here.

Image
“The See of Peter and the posts of authority in Rome being occupied by antichrists, the destruction of the Kingdom of Our Lord is being rapidly carried out even within His Mystical Body here below (…) This is what has brought down upon our heads persecution by the Rome of the antichrists.” (Letter to the future bishops, 29 August 1987)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2j1MIqYLwAY

Dr. Chojnowski: As you can see from this video and the interview with Fr. Bisig, the Fraternity of St. Peter is exactly how Fr. Poisson portrayed it in the interview published on this website. He sees himself as part and parcel of the Novus Ordo church and urges us to join. Time for another quote by Archbishop Lefebvre:
“To whatever extent pope, bishops, priests or faithful adhere to this new Church, they separate themselves from the Catholic Church.” (July 29, 1976, Reflections on the Suspension a divinis)
Read more

Gallicanism: Traditional Catholicism Without the Catholicism. Or Why Popes Matter.

Image
Lest we confuse when we sling the accusation of "Gallicanism" at those who continue to try to change the Church and the Faith in response to Francis and his abominations, we should define what we mean. Rather we will let Michael Miller, whose "Notes on Church History in France," were published in Dom Prosper Gueranger's book against Gallicanism, entitled, The Papal Monarchy, present the basic definition for us: "'Gallicanism' is a group of religious opinions which for some time was peculiar to the Church in France and the theological schools of that country. This view of the Church tended to restrict the authority of the pope, while extending the competence of the bishops and the temporal ruler."

"Gallican theory acknowledged papal primacy, but claimed that it was limited by the power of princes, by the authority of a general (ecumenical council), by the authority of the bishops, and by the canons and customs of local churches. According t…
Read more

Who are the Bad Fundamentalists that Francis and his Imam Friend Condemned as Evil in Abu Dhabi? I bet it was you!

Image
From the Zenit article on the Apostasy at Abu Dhabi:
https://zenit.org/articles/abu-dhabi-historic-document-signed-by-pope-francis-and-grand-imam-of-al-azhar/

Earlier today, Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin told journalists, including Zenit’s Deborah Lubov, that the importance of this day is dialogue among religions, especially Christianity and Islam, promoting peace and combatting fundamentalism.

Dr. Chojnowski: Have you wondered yet who are these "fundamentalists" who are the main source of evil in our world, the evil ones who are keeping the world from realizing a utopian existence of equality, fraternity, gender equity, and dialogue? I would bet that every one who is now reading this website would be fit into that category by not only the ridiculous women pictured above but by Francis the Apostate and his Imam "fellow believer." What is important here is how "official" it all is. The above statement about "dialogue among religions&…
Read more