Announcement 2019: Sworn Declaration from Handwriting Analyst Demonstrates that Sister Lucy II was Imposter. Vatican-Released Third Secret text Proven to be Authentic and Consistent with Memoirs of Sister Lucy I.
True and False Sister Lucy.
Is there a "Fourth Secret"?
Dr. Chojnowski: As we try to figure out how best to post the Handwriting Experts Sworn Declaration which indicates that the handwriting of Sister Lucy post-1958 is NOT consistent with the handwriting of Sister Lucy pre-1958 --- hence indicating forgery and doing much to verify the judgment that the post-1958 Sister Lucy was an imposter --- I want to give my readers the heads up as to what was found in a very brief form. The entire 114 page declaration will be available as soon as we are able. The report indicates:
1) The writing of "Sister Lucy" in 1969 was NOT consistent with the writings of Sister Lucy in her memoirs form the 20s, 30s, and 40s, indicating forgery and an imposter operating at the time.
2) The Third Secret text dating from 1944, released by the Vatican in 2000, was AUTHENTIC AND CONSISTENT WITH THE 20s, 30s, and 40s, writings of Sister Lucy I. Although this is not…
Is there a "Fourth Secret"?
Dr. Chojnowski: As we try to figure out how best to post the Handwriting Experts Sworn Declaration which indicates that the handwriting of Sister Lucy post-1958 is NOT consistent with the handwriting of Sister Lucy pre-1958 --- hence indicating forgery and doing much to verify the judgment that the post-1958 Sister Lucy was an imposter --- I want to give my readers the heads up as to what was found in a very brief form. The entire 114 page declaration will be available as soon as we are able. The report indicates:
1) The writing of "Sister Lucy" in 1969 was NOT consistent with the writings of Sister Lucy in her memoirs form the 20s, 30s, and 40s, indicating forgery and an imposter operating at the time.
2) The Third Secret text dating from 1944, released by the Vatican in 2000, was AUTHENTIC AND CONSISTENT WITH THE 20s, 30s, and 40s, writings of Sister Lucy I. Although this is not…
Remarking on a not totally unrelated event, Israel has opened it's blood libel against the Palestinians by killing and wounding over 2700. I wonder if the Jesuit "pope" of peace and love will condemn this sick atrocity in no uncertain terms. I think I know the answer. Vat2 not only introduced novelties and heresies, but the Novus Ordo operation came under the influence and rule of Jesuitical Jewry which not only promotes theological heresies but the grave crimes of Zionism and communism. The blood of the Palestinians is on the hands of all the "popes" that have promoted this false Talmudic religion....a religion as false as the Novus Ordo one...perhaps the two are one.
ReplyDeleteMsgr Livi spills the beans over at OnePeterFive. It's been a plot, a plan, a conspiracy. Bergoglio is just a final fruition. The path was cleverly laid out for him by his predecessors. The most clever modernist, protestant, judeo-masonic destroyer being Ratzinger. (9 rabbis on his mother's side). Did they deliberately destroy the Catholic ordination rights in 1969? Seems that was the plan. But as the fowler caught in his own trap, that means everything they have done is absolutely null and totally void.
ReplyDeleteWhy was the rite of the Sacrament of Holy Order changed first? Without Roman Catholic bishops there will be no more True Sacrifice--no more true sacraments at all. Remember what Fr. Carl Pulvermacher said, When there are no more priests they will give us the Latin Mass.
Delete