Breaking: St. Anthanasius Church in Vienna, VA Officially Renounces the Recognize and Resist Position: Straight from the Bulletin

Dr. Chojnowski: Here is an announcement placed in Fr. Ringrose's St. Athanasius Church. This was just sent me by a parishioner. I don't see how you can say anything else but they are rejecting what has come to be called the "recognize and resist" position. What will Fr. Ortiz do since I know he is a "recognize and resist" Resistance priest? Things are a changin'.


Here is the video the bulletin speaks of:


Comments

  1. AnonymousApril 29, 2018 at 8:16 PM

    For all those catholics that are trying to defend the validity of the current papacy and the last 60 years of modernism, judaism and freemasonry that have destroyed both church and state...hear from the simple, chosen, and pure saint. St Bernadette....question, do you fear anything? Answer, I fear only bad catholics, question, you fear nothing else? answer, no nothing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownApril 30, 2018 at 8:03 AM

      Problem is, recognize and resist ain’t even Catholics. They are apostates. Are apostates Catholics?

      Delete
  2. UnknownApril 30, 2018 at 7:44 AM

    It’s great news. As a parishenor, my prayers have been answered....

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousMay 4, 2018 at 10:37 AM

    Good for Fr. Ringrose. Hopefully he has been cathing up on his theology since to get a better idea of the Cassiciacum thesis. For much has been written on this topic since the 1970's. And most still don't understand it for it is usually explained by those who don't understand it or reject it outright. What certainly needs to be cleared up is terminology and the essence of the thesis. First, there is no such thing as sedeprivationism. It doesn't correspond to the reality of the thesis. It is not the See that is struck with privation but the designee to the papacy. Second, the person designed to be Pope remains "pope" only materially because of the obstacle to his reception of Christ's authority. This obstacle is not heresy but the lack of an objective and habitual intention to procure the common good of the Church which is the glory of God and the salvation of souls. There is no talk of personal heresy in good articles on the thesis. This isn't any part of the argument. The material heresies proferred by the designee to the papacy only converge to the main point: that this designee has no real and efficacious intention to do what he is inteded to do as the Pope. This is an a posteriori proof that he is lacking Christ's authority. Hopefully all the priests that are looking into the Cassiciacum thesis take their time to study it for it is often distorted, even by its adherents. What is also very important is the fact that adherents of the thesis of Bp. Guerard des Lauriers formally agree with the totalist sedevacantism adherents. The "pope" materialiter is not the Pope of the Church. Hence the possible collaboration and so forth...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousMay 28, 2018 at 7:07 AM

      What "good articles on the thesis" did you have in mind when writing that none of them mention personal heresy?

      Delete
  4. Non Habemus PapamMay 8, 2018 at 8:55 PM

    R&R position is becoming more and more unsustainable by the day, God bless Fr. Ringrose for his courage in dropping a position which --objectively speaking-- isn't catholic.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Sister Lucy Truth Update: Michigan State Facial Recognition Lab Finds that Sister Lucy II (post-1967) was NOT Sister Lucy I (pre-1967). How Much Do We Need to Put Out Until the Crickets Stop Chirping?

Image
We said that we look at the case in a scientific way and we have. This weekend, we will publish on sisterlucyimposter.org the facial recognition report about Sister Lucy I and II. Michigan State University is the only university in the United States with a facial recognition lab, and Dr. Arun Ross is a leading professional in that field, see his biographical page at https://www.egr.msu.edu/people/profile/rossarun.

Although all of the mysteries surrounding the disappearance of the real Sister Lucy have not, by any means, been settled, it has been exactly one year since scientific facial recognition analysis identified the imposter and in order to further investigate the apparent replacement and to further seek to establish the fact, at least 4 other facial recognition tests were commissioned using a variety of the latest programs and algorithms. Other analysis was done on the pictures, by orthodontists, plastic surgeons, dentists, forensic artists, private investigators, eye doctors and…
Read more

More Than Metaphor: Our Lady at La Salette seems to have told us not only THAT the Church would be in "Eclipse," but WHEN IT WOULD GO INTO ECLIPSE, October 27th, 1958.

Image
"The Church Will Be In Eclipse"
                 Eclipse? October 27, 1958.
                Gives You Chills and Tears.


This gives me the chills. Thanks to the new book by Dr. Taylor Marshall and by the research of an invaluable co-worker at Sister Lucy Truth, it has come to my attention that not only was Our Lady's words at La Salette about the fact that the "Church will be in Eclipse" --- there, but darkened and seemingly not there, for a "moment" (read, at least 60 years and running) --- but that Our Lady seems to have indicated to us the actual exact time in which such an "eclipse" would happen. During an eclipse over Rome! Of course, as we know, or at least as we should know, on the previous day, October 26th, 1958, the Feast of Christ the King, there was 5 minutes of white smoke that came bellowing from the Conclave that was electing a successor of Pope Pius XII. This went so far that Vatican media had announced that a pope was elected. N…
Read more

Long-Standing Fatima "Consecration of Russia" Narrative Implodes as Handwriting Expert Demonstrates 1980 Letter from "Sister Lucy" to Fr. Umberto Pasquale is Definitely a Forgery. Whatever the Real Sister Lucy Knew about the Requested Consecration of Russia DOES NOT Appear in this Letter. Fatima Center, Are You Listening? Report from Bart Baggett to be Posted Imminently.

Image
On April 13, 1980, Sister Lucy replied to Fr. Umberto's question regarding the form of consecration that Our Lady of Fatima requested:
Link to a now disproven Fatima, Sister Lucy, and Consecration of Russia Narrative: https://www.nuestrasenoradelasrosas.org/news1/SisterLucyConsecrationOfRussia.htm
Read more

Who Cares? The Remnant Moderator (Michael Matt?) Excises the Papacy from the "traditional Catholic Religion." Horrible Question to the 20,000 Pilgrims. Who do you see as a Rock of the Catholic Faith? Michael Matt's Remnant or "the Vatican of Pope Francis". Another little question. I thought "Counter-Revolutionaries" were Ultramontanists not Gallicans?

Image
https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/4503-revolutionary-fail-traditional-catholic-uprising-under-francis

How many of those 20,000 still believe that Bergoglio is the legitimate pope?



Remnant Moderator. Wilf Netherton•a day ago
Who cares?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCupLRVQ2H0
"to let the whole world know that faithful practicing Catholics who go to Mass every Sunday no longer accept the Vatican of Pope Francis as a moral authority on anything."

Dr. Chojnowski: Is the Remnant Romanticism, displayed on the "annual Chartres Pilgrimage" moving the "resistance" to the Conciliar Church from Gallicanism to full-scale Protestantism? Would even King Louis XIV say what Michael Matt said in the above clip (around the 20 min. mark) in which the teaching authority of the man he is certainly calling pope is completely rejected and the independence of "traditional Catholics" is being asserted? Are we assuming the mantle of High Church Anglic…
Read more

...una cum famulo tuo Michahel Matt et Christophorus Ferrara....Isn't it Strange How Francis Could Watch Athanasius Schneider Participate in the Matt/FSSP Catholic Identity Crisis Conference, without Censure or Disciplinary Action, Even Though Matt has Said that the "Remnant" "No longer accepts the Vatican of Pope Francis as a moral authority in ANYTHING." Strange. Just Sayin'

Image
"We got them Holy Father, Just Give Me a Little More Time." "Your Excellency, Once That is Done, We Can Find A 
Nicer Place For You Than Kazakhstan.....Hegel will win in the 
        end, my son, the Pope Emeritus has assured me of this."

Dr. Chojnowski: Isn't it strange how Francis can allow Athanasius Schneider to regularly participate --- along with the "ever loyal" FSSP --- in the "Catholic Identity Crisis Conference," including the one this year in November 2019, even though the conference is organized by Michael Matt a person who regularly slams and rejects the "moral authority" of Francis? Is there something up? If you check out the Wikipedia entry on Schneider, you find that he was "consecrated" by Cardinal Sodano of Fatima Third Secret of 2000 fame and he is part of an order called Canons Regular of the Holy Cross of Coimbra. Anything remotely to do with the Carmelite Convent of Coimbra that has produced a forged tex…
Read more

ALERT: World-Class Handwriting Analyst Demonstrates that the Writings of "Sister Lucy" from after 1957 Were Forgeries. Analysis of "Third Secret" Released by Vatican in 2000, Forged 1969 Letter Urging Obedience and Submission to Paul VI, Signatures on Letters from 1967 and 1969, Letter about Consecration of Russia From 1980, and Manuscript Released by Carmelites of Coimbra and Used as the Basis for Sister Lucy's Official Biography Published by the Blue Army WERE ALL FORGERIES. Follow the Links to the Sworn Testimony Below.

Image
https://sisterlucyimposter.org/handwriting-analysis/

New and Revised Analysis Comparing Known and Excepted Handwriting Samples form Sister Lucy to the Letter Written in November of 1969, in which complete obedience to Paul VI's revolutionary actions in the Church is urged. Analyst certifies that the "Third Secret" (written in 1944) released by the Vatican IS consistent with the known Sister Lucy's handwritings, leaving open the possibility of a "Fourth Secret." https://sisterlucyimposter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/BaggettOpinionPacket-Extrc-Revised2.pdf
Sworn testimony and analysis of "Manuscript of Sister Lucy" which served as the basis, put forward as authentic by the Carmelites of Coimbra, for Sister Lucy's official biography. This cleverly done forgery was published by the Blue Army.                                  Scroll Down to Report #2 https://sisterlucyimposter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/BaggettOpinionPacket-Extrc-Revised2.pdf
Sign…
Read more

Revised and Updated Edition of Handwriting Analyst Declaration in which 1969 Letter of "Sister Lucy" Advocating Submission to Paul VI is Proven to be a Forgery. Soon to be Released on SisterLucyimposter.org. Includes Analysis of the Purported Third Secret Released in 2000. Socci's "4th Secret" Looking More Plausible. Folks, if Sister Lucy was around in 1969, she would have been able to write her own letters.

Image
The letter which Bart Baggett has definitively analyzed, translated above, has proven to be a cleverly attempted FORGERY. Obviously, Paul VI had not finished using the persona of "Sister Lucy" to shut down opposition to his agenda after May 13th, 1967. Notice that in a letter of thanks to a man who gave a gift to the convent of Coimbra, she spends 80% of the letter telling you to obey probably the greatest revolutionary and Modernist in the history of the Catholic Church. Rather than being the leader of the opposition or should we say "prophet of doom," "Sister Lucy" 1969 is Paul VI's greatest defender, urging complete obedience to one who speaks for God and to object to whom means that you are separated from the Vine of the Catholic Church and face the Fires of Hell. The importance of this find cannot be overstated. 

The Revised version of the legal declaration by Mr. Bart Baggett will be released shortly on sisterlucyimposter.org 


Read more