Breaking: St. Anthanasius Church in Vienna, VA Officially Renounces the Recognize and Resist Position: Straight from the Bulletin

-
Dr. Chojnowski: Here is an announcement placed in Fr. Ringrose's St. Athanasius Church. This was just sent me by a parishioner. I don't see how you can say anything else but they are rejecting what has come to be called the "recognize and resist" position. What will Fr. Ortiz do since I know he is a "recognize and resist" Resistance priest? Things are a changin'.


Here is the video the bulletin speaks of:


Comments

  1. AnonymousApril 29, 2018 at 8:16 PM

    For all those catholics that are trying to defend the validity of the current papacy and the last 60 years of modernism, judaism and freemasonry that have destroyed both church and state...hear from the simple, chosen, and pure saint. St Bernadette....question, do you fear anything? Answer, I fear only bad catholics, question, you fear nothing else? answer, no nothing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownApril 30, 2018 at 8:03 AM

      Problem is, recognize and resist ain’t even Catholics. They are apostates. Are apostates Catholics?

      Delete
  2. UnknownApril 30, 2018 at 7:44 AM

    It’s great news. As a parishenor, my prayers have been answered....

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousMay 4, 2018 at 10:37 AM

    Good for Fr. Ringrose. Hopefully he has been cathing up on his theology since to get a better idea of the Cassiciacum thesis. For much has been written on this topic since the 1970's. And most still don't understand it for it is usually explained by those who don't understand it or reject it outright. What certainly needs to be cleared up is terminology and the essence of the thesis. First, there is no such thing as sedeprivationism. It doesn't correspond to the reality of the thesis. It is not the See that is struck with privation but the designee to the papacy. Second, the person designed to be Pope remains "pope" only materially because of the obstacle to his reception of Christ's authority. This obstacle is not heresy but the lack of an objective and habitual intention to procure the common good of the Church which is the glory of God and the salvation of souls. There is no talk of personal heresy in good articles on the thesis. This isn't any part of the argument. The material heresies proferred by the designee to the papacy only converge to the main point: that this designee has no real and efficacious intention to do what he is inteded to do as the Pope. This is an a posteriori proof that he is lacking Christ's authority. Hopefully all the priests that are looking into the Cassiciacum thesis take their time to study it for it is often distorted, even by its adherents. What is also very important is the fact that adherents of the thesis of Bp. Guerard des Lauriers formally agree with the totalist sedevacantism adherents. The "pope" materialiter is not the Pope of the Church. Hence the possible collaboration and so forth...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousMay 28, 2018 at 7:07 AM

      What "good articles on the thesis" did you have in mind when writing that none of them mention personal heresy?

      Delete
  4. Non Habemus PapamMay 8, 2018 at 8:55 PM

    R&R position is becoming more and more unsustainable by the day, God bless Fr. Ringrose for his courage in dropping a position which --objectively speaking-- isn't catholic.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?

-
Image
  Here are the list of the 53 Cardinals who met in Rome for the Conclave in Rome in October 1958.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_electors_for_the_1958_papal_conclave Dr. Chojnowski: This telegraph from Ambassador Zellerbach (US ambassador to Italy) and the Secretary of State of the United States under the Eisenhower administration, John Foster Dulles is a clear path mark indicating to us what we should be looking for as regards the happenings in the 1958 papal conclave that met from October 25-28, exactly 2 weeks after this telegram to the US Secretary of State was written and sent.  What do we read in this telegram and why does it matter in our investigation into the fate of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima? We do not, as of yet, have a smoking gun telegram, but this one is clearly a picture of a double-barrel shot gun loaded, locked, safety off, aimed, and finger on the trigger communication. The US government seems an imminent "threat" and it is...
Read more

Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person.

-
Image
Sister Lucy I: Missing Sister Lucy II: Impostor I can now release the overall results of the facial recognition tests that have been performed using the most up to date technology available analyzed by the most sophisticated software technicians and organized and analyzed by an expert investigator. "The only thing similar was the habit" were the words I just heard from the investigator in our phone conversation about the result. More specifics on the technicalities of the result will follow this initial announcement. On advice, I will not yet reveal the names of the investigators, the names of the companies involved, or the names of the programs being used. They are the best. They are all working on a comprehensive and definite report on the results and this will be released in the coming weeks. I want to avoid any interference in the investigation. After the final facial recognition report is complete, the second phase of the investigation will be launched whi...
Read more

Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate Excommunicates Francis for Heresy; forbids Priests and Bishops to Mention him in the Divine Liturgy.

-
Image
Wow! Here is the video and text excommunication of Francis by the Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate for heresy, apostasy, and rejection of the Natural Law. Read the text below and see the video above: February 14th, 2018 Ash Wednesday Francis Bergoglio, a Jesuit, has been admonished, warned several times to distance himself from heresies. However, he obstinately rejects any repentance. He continues to cause extreme  offense  not only to the believers of the Roman Catholic Church but also to all Christians and unbelievers. By abusing the supreme church authority through heresies, he intensely promotes the self-destruction of the Church, in matters of both faith and morals. It concerns the following heresies: Francis Bergoglio 1)  denied  the universally valid  moral norms  in the exhortation Amoris Laetitia. 2) did not distance himself from heresies of syncretism with paganism which place the redemptive death of Christ on the same level as ...
Read more