1961: Letter reveals Demands made by The American Jewish Committee to Cardinal Bea to Change Catholic Teaching and Liturgy. Guess what ended up happening?

Comments

  1. Is this the same Abraham Heschel that in an interview once said he wanted to wage war on Christian souls and that he preferred the "weapon" of dialogue to that of open warfare? The same Heschel who mentored Michael King (alias Martin) who would wind up having the most exalted day in the American Catholic Church calendar outside the days of Christmas and Easter, despite his clear communist ties, vile moral life and the fact that he was a heretic?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for the insight, Doctor. Things could not be clearer for those who wish to see! The shocking element is that Pius XII obliged to an extent...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is this when the Jewish leadership decided to eliminate the Anti Christian blasphemies against Our Lord Jesus Christ and Our Holy Mother in the Talmud? Did they agree at this time to designate the same with an (O) ,meaning oral tradition to be passed down only verbally from their Rabbis?
    If so , it would appear one sided and deceptive for the stated purpose of bettering relations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You must mean those Talmud passage about Jesus boiling in his own excrement in hell, and the Virgin Mary fornicating with a Roman soldier (in case people didn't know). Do as I say, not as I do, when it comes to perfidious Jews.

      Delete
  4. What I can't understand is why the American Jewish Committee would address their 'concerns' to the Secretariat for Christian Unity. What have Jewish matters got to do with Christian Unity? Nothing. Absolutely nothing.

    But there must have been something going on for the Jews to correctly gauge that circumstances were favourable for them to make their insolent accusations. And sure enough, they had the desired impact.

    At Vatican II it had been planned to discuss only the relationship of the Church with 'Christian' confessions, leaving non-Christians out of the picture, but with the hijacking of the Council right from the start, this agenda changed completely. Suddenly, protracted discussions about the relationship of the Church with non-Christians were on the table.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Jews were milking the holocaust at the time (and still are), trying to blame Christians for what happened to them. Never mind the majority of Bolsheviks were Jews, a revolutionary movement that ended up murdering tens of millions of Christians in Russia. Much worse than the holocaust.

      “There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and atheistic Jews. It is certainly a very great one. It probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principle inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders... In the Soviet Institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for combatting Counter-Revolution (the Cheka) has been taken by Jews.”

      Winston Churchill, London Times, February, 1920

      Steve D.




      Delete
  5. Do you catch that, Catholics? According to the Jews, even St. John the Evangelist is an anti-Semite for simply stating the truth about the Jews and their rejection of the Messiah. This is the insane, PC world we live in now.

    Steve D.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Devastating and revealing piece on the Christ or Chaos site...." The Montini Paradigm shift". May the scales fall from our eyes as the men and the methods used to replace the true Church are revealed.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Amazon Facial Recognition Technology Determines that Sister Lucy I and Sister Lucy II are not the Same Person. Not One Match Amidst Thousands of Comparisons.

Sister Lucy Truth Update: Michigan State Facial Recognition Lab Finds that Sister Lucy II (post-1967) was NOT Sister Lucy I (pre-1967). How Much Do We Need to Put Out Until the Crickets Stop Chirping?

More Than Metaphor: Our Lady at La Salette seems to have told us not only THAT the Church would be in "Eclipse," but WHEN IT WOULD GO INTO ECLIPSE, October 27th, 1958.

Long-Standing Fatima "Consecration of Russia" Narrative Implodes as Handwriting Expert Demonstrates 1980 Letter from "Sister Lucy" to Fr. Umberto Pasquale is Definitely a Forgery. Whatever the Real Sister Lucy Knew about the Requested Consecration of Russia DOES NOT Appear in this Letter. Fatima Center, Are You Listening? Report from Bart Baggett to be Posted Imminently.

ALERT: World-Class Handwriting Analyst Demonstrates that the Writings of "Sister Lucy" from after 1957 Were Forgeries. Analysis of "Third Secret" Released by Vatican in 2000, Forged 1969 Letter Urging Obedience and Submission to Paul VI, Signatures on Letters from 1967 and 1969, Letter about Consecration of Russia From 1980, and Manuscript Released by Carmelites of Coimbra and Used as the Basis for Sister Lucy's Official Biography Published by the Blue Army WERE ALL FORGERIES. Follow the Links to the Sworn Testimony Below.

...una cum famulo tuo Michahel Matt et Christophorus Ferrara....Isn't it Strange How Francis Could Watch Athanasius Schneider Participate in the Matt/FSSP Catholic Identity Crisis Conference, without Censure or Disciplinary Action, Even Though Matt has Said that the "Remnant" "No longer accepts the Vatican of Pope Francis as a moral authority in ANYTHING." Strange. Just Sayin'

Revised and Updated Edition of Handwriting Analyst Declaration in which 1969 Letter of "Sister Lucy" Advocating Submission to Paul VI is Proven to be a Forgery. Soon to be Released on SisterLucyimposter.org. Includes Analysis of the Purported Third Secret Released in 2000. Socci's "4th Secret" Looking More Plausible. Folks, if Sister Lucy was around in 1969, she would have been able to write her own letters.