Cornelia Ferreira Comes Out Swinging in the Struggle for the Fatima Center
What’s Going
on at the Fatima Center?
Cornelia R.
Ferreira
On August 28th, aka
Catholic published a rather prescient blog
on an emerging “new” Fatima Center. In this posting, Louie Verrecchio observed
that the Fatima Center (FC) was lessening its fight against errors, especially
those concerning the Fatima Message, errors that the FC would have vigorously
fought under Father Nicholas Gruner.
In other words, the
Fatima Center is moving away from Traditionalism (which abhors error) towards the
conservative position (which ignores error so long as it’s mixed with some truth).
Unknown to Louie was that
at the precise time of his August 28th post, the new direction was being
confirmed in a startling set of letters mailed to American donors from the
Fatima Center in Fort Erie, Ontario, the headquarters of Father Nicholas
Gruner’s Fatima Apostolate. Note: The above mentioned letters may be read at the following address:
https://akacatholic.com/fatima-center-letters/
https://akacatholic.com/fatima-center-letters/
The letters announce a
change in the Apostolate’s organizational structure from that set up by Fr.
Gruner. On top of that, disturbing accusations against their American
co-workers in the letters have shocked and confused readers, who are asking,
“What’s going on at the Fatima Center?”
As a long-time associate
of Fr. Gruner and the FC, l have been asked if I could shed some light on these
letters, which I received from a friend, and which were as much a surprise to
me as to their recipients.
I cannot purport to
answer the nebulous allegations themselves, nor what triggered their
publication; I leave that to the “accused” to address. However, there are errors
and inconsistenicies in the letters themselves, to which it is possible to
respond.
The Fatima Center is
incorporated under the name “The
National Committee for the National Pilgrim Virgin of Canada” (NPV). Let’s
first consider its letter of August 22nd, signed by mere managers and some Board Directors (incredibly, at
least one other Director, Coralie Graham, was kept in the dark about it).
The NPV declares it is
“necessary to sever [its] connection” with its sister corporation, Servants of
Jesus and Mary (SJM), in Constable, New York, because it is this branch of the Apostolate that is allegedly
going in a different direction than that established by Fr. Gruner.
SJM is supposedly “changing
the mission of The Fatima Center” by trying to involve it in “several
controversial issues within the Church.” Indeed, things are so bad that the FC
feels it’s being “sidetracked or prevented
from making the ENTIRE Fatima Message understood and followed by EVERYONE.” (The
emphasis is theirs.)
Coming from an
organization that excitedly praises a Cardinal (Raymond Burke) who is spreading
a fake Fatima Message, this is effrontery at its finest.
But, the FC barrels ahead
with the vague accusation that the SJM has also recently “begun to make
arbitrary decisions that negatively affect the operational effectiveness of the
apostolate and hinder us from carrying out our mission.”
Further, it has “pushed
for The Fatima Center to change direction and become more radical in its
orientation.” (What do they mean by “orientation”? The uncompromising
Traditionalism of the old FC, or the conciliatory Conservative-traditionalism
being embraced by the new?)
And so, “to preserve
Father Gruner’s legacy and the integrity of The Fatima Center’s mission,” says
the letter’s signatories, “we find it necessary to sever our connection with
SJM.”
To keep the donations flowing,
the FC has set up a new American branch, The Fatima Center USA Inc.
With absolutely no details,
examples, or evidence provided of the SJM’s wrongdoings, these baseless
allegations from the NPV/Fatima Center could certainly be construed as libellous.
And just how scurrilous
the allegations are can be seen when one considers the history of SJM and its close
working relationship with NPV.
Servants of Jesus and
Mary was not set up by Fr. Gruner,
nor as merely a mail clearing-house, as the letter from The Fatima Center
paints it. Presumably to make the dismissal of SJM seem unimportant, the FC
tries to downplay SJM’s importance, claiming it was not involved in the
production of literature nor in any decision-making about its own work.
Servants of Jesus and
Mary was founded by Fr. Michael Jarecki in the late 70’s as a spiritual
organization promoting the message of Fatima. Some years later its members began
helping out as volunteers in Fr. Gruner’s apostolate. Even later, under its
original name, it began to facilitate the extension of Fr. Gruner’s work into
the USA, and it also became involved in the production of literature for the
Fatima Center. Both priests worked closely together, with Fr. Gruner being the
President of both boards. All major decisions were made by both boards.
Returning to the FC
letter, we note a puzzling signature: that of Andrew Cesanek, listed as
Vice-President of the FC. But at the time he signed the letter, he was
Vice-President of SJM, the same supposedly
delinquent organization he was divorcing! How curious that he would tar himself
with the same brush.
As to the FC’s claim that
“Catholics of good will can disagree” on (undefined) “controversial issues,” it
itself seems to display zero tolerance for those who disagree with it or raise
uncomfortable topics. Bear in mind that the “new” Center is not focused on
correcting errors, and is instead exhibiting a type of Catholic “ecumenism” (which I defined
earlier), seeking unity with conservatives.
Could this be why not
just the SJM, but the following three individuals “of good will” have also fallen
afoul of the Fatima Center?
For instance, Fr. Paul Kramer,
President of the SJM Board, had been invited to address the Fatima Conference
in California in September, but was very recently dis-invited. Most people know
Father is a world-renowned Fatima expert who was a friend and close
collaborator of Fr. Gruner since they were seminarians. Father Kramer has been working
on the subject of whether Francis is a true Pope, a topic that Fr.
Gruner himself raised shortly before his death.
Louie Verrechio, another
invited speaker, suffered the same fate shortly after posting my article
critical of Cardinal Burke’s Fatima speech at the Rome Life Forum (after the
article was turned down by Catholic
Family News).
Coralie Graham, who
worked side-by-side with Fr. Gruner for over three decades and was editor of The Fatima Crusader for more than a
quarter century, was abruptly shown the door a short while ago. Of all Father’s
staff, she was probably the closest in thinking to him. She has always insisted
on truth and the Catholic duty of correcting error.
Now what is truly
mind-boggling is that the letter terminating the Servants of Jesus and Mary was
also signed by two managers of the FC. Since when do employees have the power
to get rid of a Board of Directors, especially that of another corporation?
These managers have certainly built up their own “team” in the letter.
The second letter, from
the Advisory Council of Priests, indicates that even these priest advisers have
been convinced that it is the managers who are singularly responsible for the
apostolate. The priests imply the Fort Erie managers and staff are the only
ones trained and trusted by Fr. Gruner to do his work, leading one to unjustly
conclude that their American co-workers are not as “good and dedicated” as
they.
Interestingly, although
the Fatima Center lists five priests on its Advisory Council (as per its Winter
2017 Fatima Center News publication),
only three of them signed the letter. Why did the other two not sign?
We await a response from Servants of Jesus and
Mary to the letters sent out by The Fatima Center. The scandalous allegations
and the questions they raise need to be addressed sooner rather than later, because
people around the world are confused and perturbed by this lamentable split in
Father Gruner’s apostolate
The whole matter while sad and disheartening is not surprising.
ReplyDeleteWhile Fr. Gruner certainly had good men and women supporting his life's work, he was the "immovable object and the irresistible force" that the Vatican was unable to extinguish. It was just such an instrument that pulled many of us from the stupor of the Vatican II heresies (myself included). I suspect he even changed the hearts of a few willing but timid Bishops----all the while keeping himself as the lightning rod of retribution. Many organizations do not survive the loss of its life long leader particularly when hell is against it. Upon Fr. Gruner's passing I doubted his Apostolate would survive (at least in its current form).
I found it both intriguing and disheartening (especially while Fr. Gruner was alive) that the Apparitions and Warnings of the BVM (Fatima in particular) were ignored by even a few rad trads as both "private" and unnecessary. I've seen Fr. Gruner implied by these to be either an anachronism or plain misguided. How foolish of any to ignore the last efforts of our God to set us on the path to avoid chastisement. In any event such was the tremendous, daily, uphill battle faced by Fr Gruner. Who exists willing to take his place?
I strongly agree ! Very well said !
Delete