If Ali Agca was not an agent of Soviet Communism, doesn't the Vatican narrative concerning the contents of the Third Secret fall apart? Interesting article from the CIA declassifieds.
Would you be this peaceful if you were shot? Blood?
In this article from 1985, Alexander Cockburn clearly states that the narrative in which the Bulgarian secret service, directed by the KGB, set up Ali Agca to attempt the assassination of John Paul II was unsubstantiated. Rather than being in isolated conditions, Agca interacted with a steady stream of Italian intelligence operatives who coached him on the supposed Bulgarian connection to the assassination plot. This was in 1981 and no subsequent evidence substantiated this supposed Bulgarian connection. But if there was no Soviet connection to the assassination, who was the power behind it? Also, if there was no Communist source of the attack, how can the Vatican narrative concerning the meaning of the released "Third Secret" be taken seriously? According to the official interpretation, the Third Secret was identical to the 2nd Secret and spoke of the persecution of Christians by the atheistic Communist regimes of the 20th century. This persecution was culminated, according to the official interpretation, with the assassination attempt on the life of John Paul II. If the attempt had nothing to do with Communism and a Communist states attack, how could the interpretation of the vision be correct? The "bishop in white" vision, possibly an account of a vision had by Jacinta -- and recorded by Lucia -- with no relation to the real Third Secret, was cynically used by the Vatican to promote John Paul II as the central figure in the Third Secret when such an interpretation is extraordinarily far-fetched.
But questions remain. Why did the assassination attempt just happen to occur on May 13th, 1981, the anniversary of the first apparition at Fatima? Why was JPII reported to have been bending down towards a girl with a picture of Our Lady of Fatima on her dress when he was shot? All this takes on a very eery tone when we realize that the woman that had been very briefly trotted out to the world as "Sister Lucy" in 1967, was again trotted out in 1982 at the behest of JPII. Why the desire to open the deception again to public view? Also, does JPII look like he has just been shot in the picture above? I would not be so placid as he seems to be in those circumstances. The whole thing just becomes more and more creepy in light of the facts brought forward by Sister Lucy Truth.
Also, weren't the Grey Wolves, that Ali Agca was a part of, part of Operation Gladio? If so, was there any CIA or US government involvement in either the JPII assassination attempt or the disappearance of the real Sister Lucy?
Help us find out with a Christmas donation to sisterlucytruth.org/donate