Rev. Sam Osborne, Mysteries of the Mass, Gnosticon 4, Sept. 18th 2021. An Explanation of the Gnostic Rite of "Mass" that Leads Us to Wonder Why this Intentional Mass of the Albigensian, Manichean, and Gnostic Heretics is Almost Identical to the New Mass of the Masonic Paul VI.
From the recent Gnosticon. We ask ourselves the question as to why this ritual, intentionally heretical and invoking all the major heretics of the distant past --- resembles so much the Novus Ordo Missae of the Masonic Paul VI, both in the ritual itself, the attitude of the celebrant (I think he would be classified as a "reverent" "conservative" "priest" --- by our friends on EWTN), and in the naturalistic Teilhardian theology articulated by the "priest." Could it be that the effective banning of the "Latin Mass" is payback by people associated with this Kabbalistic sect for the "burning of the Cathars," who are mentioned here as "saints"? The rejection of vicarious atonement by these heretics is very interesting, since we see the same thing in the theology of the Neo-Modernist heretic Josef Ratzinger. It is not the Body and Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ that is offered by these Neo-Manicheans, but rather the "
Was Russia consecrated?ReplyDelete
Why you asked such a stupid question? Don't you see anything around in the world to answer your own question?ReplyDelete
Actually, the only stupid question is the one that is not asked. A simple charitable answer would suffice, e.g., No, not as Our Lady requested. Pius XII consecrated Russia privately, not publicly and in union with the world's bishops as Our Lady requested. And the consecration cannot be done by the Vatican II anti-popes even if they wanted to. It requires a validly elected pope and the last one was Cardinal Giuseppe Siri, who took the name Gregory XVII on Oct 26, 1958, after which there was 5 minutes of white smoke and Vatican Radio announcing, "There can be no doubt -- a pope has been elected!" He was then given a message through the Freemason Cardinal Tisserant from the Jewish Masonic organization B'nai B'rith threatening to nuke the Vatican and its environs if he didn't step down, which he did -- invalidly. Anti-pope John XXIII was invalidly elected 2 days later. A good intro to the subject is "Papal Imposters," and a more thorough presentation is at "The Siri Project" channel (start with the 3 min 41 sec segment), both on youtube.Delete
Fifth Sunday Aafter EasterReplyDelete
9th May, 2021 A. D.
There is no such thing as a dumb question. The answer Daniel is no. Russia was never consecrated.
That is I believe a primary motive to remove Sr. Lucia of Fatima from the picture: she never backed down on the truth of what Our Lady said. She already assessed various attempts at consecrating the world and declared them wanting as to what was asked of Russia in that they failed to meet the simple request of Our Lady, which is this:
That the Pope consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart; and that he order all the bishops of the world to do likewise. Publicly and at the same time.
This Pius IX could not bring himself to do. This Pius XII could not bring himself to do. And far less could or would John XXIII or Paul VI.
Nor did John Paul II bring himself to consecrate Russia in this manner. John Paul I (Albino Luciani) may have done so, as he seemed intent on purging the Church of certain scoundrel cardinals and archbishops. He I suspect was open to following the commands of Our Lady of Fatima, which once having read the third secret—both parts—he may have been moved to act. But he never had the chance, being assassinated a mere 33 days into his reign...no autopsy; embalmment within 12 hours of discovery of the crime by sundown the same day(!). Nothing to see here.
Nor tragically did Pope Benedict XVIth, although while he still has breath he still has time. It is my devout prayer that he could and will still do so.
Don’t look to Antipope Francis as he’s not a valid pope. He is the very vanguard of the apostasy in the Church foretold by Our Lady at Fatima, and likely the false pope of Fatima leading the people into a Church of Hell. At a personal meeting—the only one between the men—Antipope Francis rebuffed Vladimir Putin’s request to discuss Fatima.
The fake Sister Lucy assured the world, by contrast, that the consecration by oblique reference amidst yet another world consecration as performed by John Paul II in 1982 “was accepted” in the eyes of heaven. That, and to endorse the false claim of Bertobe/Sodano/Ratzinger that the Third Secret was fully revealed in 2000–and by extension to justify and cover for the crime of John XXIII who freely choose to disobey a direct command of Our Lady and to suppress the entire Third Secret in 1960 by failing to reveal it; and finally to endorse the suicidal changes of Vatican II:
These are the three reasons the second Sr. Lucy the Imposter was invented in 1967. This is her three-fold fraudulent raison d’etre.
Pius XI (Achilles Ratti), not Pio Nono.
I hope this helps.