Rev. Sam Osborne, Mysteries of the Mass, Gnosticon 4, Sept. 18th 2021. An Explanation of the Gnostic Rite of "Mass" that Leads Us to Wonder Why this Intentional Mass of the Albigensian, Manichean, and Gnostic Heretics is Almost Identical to the New Mass of the Masonic Paul VI.
From the recent Gnosticon. We ask ourselves the question as to why this ritual, intentionally heretical and invoking all the major heretics of the distant past --- resembles so much the Novus Ordo Missae of the Masonic Paul VI, both in the ritual itself, the attitude of the celebrant (I think he would be classified as a "reverent" "conservative" "priest" --- by our friends on EWTN), and in the naturalistic Teilhardian theology articulated by the "priest." Could it be that the effective banning of the "Latin Mass" is payback by people associated with this Kabbalistic sect for the "burning of the Cathars," who are mentioned here as "saints"? The rejection of vicarious atonement by these heretics is very interesting, since we see the same thing in the theology of the Neo-Modernist heretic Josef Ratzinger. It is not the Body and Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ that is offered by these Neo-Manicheans, but rather the "
Your ignorance is astounding. You've proven Wolfgang's very point: you have no idea what he's talking about. You've misconstrued and distorted everything he believes into a horror show.ReplyDelete
In a word, it's bullshit.
Try reading his interview with Bernard Janzen, 'Unmasking the Faces of Antichrist' (http://triumphcommunications.net/booksother.html)
Maybe of simply making an assertion, how about you actually make an argument?Delete
Point out where exactly Dr. Chojnowski is misrepresenting, misinterpreting, or misunderstanding Dr. Smith, since you profess to be so knowledgeable on the subject.
See comment by Brian M @ http://radtradthomist.chojnowski.me/2021/04/practice-of-occult-arts-of-alchemy.html -- and my sub-comment there (if it's approved).Delete
Just only a few days ago, you agreed with the other commenter condemned and exposed MartinReplyDelete
Malachi as "double agent" and all kinds of scandals and today you give a link to a book praise him
as "Servant of Christ?" Are you people on drugs?
That wasn't me. Somebody else.Delete
Here we go again! Exactly WHAT have I distorted and misconstrued? Exactly what? There is always this escape into the "esoteric" realm where what Smith is saying is not the rank apostasy that it seems to be in "exoteric" language and ideas. Please enlighten!
This differs from saying sun miracles are actually comets how?ReplyDelete
A miracle is a miracle. The physical mechanism by which it happened on October 13th, 1917 is up to God the Blessed Virgin Mary. Why can't the Miracle of the Sun have a physical component involving a comet? Why wasn't the solar system destroyed and why did no one outside of the Fatima area see or feel the "dance" of the Sun. Note, Our Lady said that there was going to be a miracle in October, not a solar miracle. With Dr. Ferriin's research, the physical aspects of the Miracle could be explained while the viewers experience of it would be identical to what has always been said about it. He just demonstrates that it is not, in any way, a simple "matter of the mind."Delete
Hi Dr. Chojinowski, I've listened to your interview.ReplyDelete
You blame Wolfgang Smith as "an occultist" due to the mention he does of the traditional sacred sciences.
But it's not coherent to praise his criticism of scientism—as you do—while condemning key elements necessary for such a discernment—the traditional sciences.
You are mistaking them with their modern, occultist parodies; which is mixing chalk and cheese.
Also, when you blame Dr. Smith as preferring "a God born of the darkness", you're not taking into account he's known as a staunch defender of the Holy Trinity.
I don't think your portrayal of him as a malignant, strayed figure can convince anybody having bothered to read what he has to say.