"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?
Here are the list of the 53 Cardinals who met in Rome for the Conclave in Rome in October 1958. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_electors_for_the_1958_papal_conclave Dr. Chojnowski: This telegraph from Ambassador Zellerbach (US ambassador to Italy) and the Secretary of State of the United States under the Eisenhower administration, John Foster Dulles is a clear path mark indicating to us what we should be looking for as regards the happenings in the 1958 papal conclave that met from October 25-28, exactly 2 weeks after this telegram to the US Secretary of State was written and sent. What do we read in this telegram and why does it matter in our investigation into the fate of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima? We do not, as of yet, have a smoking gun telegram, but this one is clearly a picture of a double-barrel shot gun loaded, locked, safety off, aimed, and finger on the trigger communication. The US government seems an imminent "threat" and it is...
Your ignorance is astounding. You've proven Wolfgang's very point: you have no idea what he's talking about. You've misconstrued and distorted everything he believes into a horror show.
ReplyDeleteIn a word, it's bullshit.
Try reading his interview with Bernard Janzen, 'Unmasking the Faces of Antichrist' (http://triumphcommunications.net/booksother.html)
Maybe of simply making an assertion, how about you actually make an argument?
DeletePoint out where exactly Dr. Chojnowski is misrepresenting, misinterpreting, or misunderstanding Dr. Smith, since you profess to be so knowledgeable on the subject.
See comment by Brian M @ http://radtradthomist.chojnowski.me/2021/04/practice-of-occult-arts-of-alchemy.html -- and my sub-comment there (if it's approved).
DeleteJust only a few days ago, you agreed with the other commenter condemned and exposed Martin
ReplyDeleteMalachi as "double agent" and all kinds of scandals and today you give a link to a book praise him
as "Servant of Christ?" Are you people on drugs?
That wasn't me. Somebody else.
DeleteDear Friend,
ReplyDeleteHere we go again! Exactly WHAT have I distorted and misconstrued? Exactly what? There is always this escape into the "esoteric" realm where what Smith is saying is not the rank apostasy that it seems to be in "exoteric" language and ideas. Please enlighten!
This differs from saying sun miracles are actually comets how?
ReplyDeleteA miracle is a miracle. The physical mechanism by which it happened on October 13th, 1917 is up to God the Blessed Virgin Mary. Why can't the Miracle of the Sun have a physical component involving a comet? Why wasn't the solar system destroyed and why did no one outside of the Fatima area see or feel the "dance" of the Sun. Note, Our Lady said that there was going to be a miracle in October, not a solar miracle. With Dr. Ferriin's research, the physical aspects of the Miracle could be explained while the viewers experience of it would be identical to what has always been said about it. He just demonstrates that it is not, in any way, a simple "matter of the mind."
DeleteHi Dr. Chojinowski, I've listened to your interview.
ReplyDeleteYou blame Wolfgang Smith as "an occultist" due to the mention he does of the traditional sacred sciences.
But it's not coherent to praise his criticism of scientism—as you do—while condemning key elements necessary for such a discernment—the traditional sciences.
You are mistaking them with their modern, occultist parodies; which is mixing chalk and cheese.
Also, when you blame Dr. Smith as preferring "a God born of the darkness", you're not taking into account he's known as a staunch defender of the Holy Trinity.
I don't think your portrayal of him as a malignant, strayed figure can convince anybody having bothered to read what he has to say.
Regards