Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person.
Sister Lucy I: Missing Sister Lucy II: Impostor I can now release the overall results of the facial recognition tests that have been performed using the most up to date technology available analyzed by the most sophisticated software technicians and organized and analyzed by an expert investigator. "The only thing similar was the habit" were the words I just heard from the investigator in our phone conversation about the result. More specifics on the technicalities of the result will follow this initial announcement. On advice, I will not yet reveal the names of the investigators, the names of the companies involved, or the names of the programs being used. They are the best. They are all working on a comprehensive and definite report on the results and this will be released in the coming weeks. I want to avoid any interference in the investigation. After the final facial recognition report is complete, the second phase of the investigation will be launched whi...
Do we know Escriva knew about the impostor? Perhaps he was deceived like everyone else. Until Dr. Chinowski's heroic work nobody even thought to question the identity of the impostor.
ReplyDeleteThis needs to break into secular mainstream media. "Traditional" Catholic media has chosen to ignore the facts to keep selling magazines to the pious and deceived. Sr. Bergoglio, aka "Pope Francis" should be our primary target and Fr Ratzinger too. They are the top hierarchy of the new religion endorsed by Sr. X. All it would take is a question from a mainstream reporter and the Vatican II edifice will fall like the walls of Constantinople.
Easy foot me to say. I am nobody in this world. But what I mean is, all we need is one lucky break for the faithful worldwide to begin demanding answers. If there was murder involved outside the Vatican State a criminal investigation could begin. We have plenty of good evidence.
Stop tarnishing your good work regarding Sister Lucy with rash and unjust accusations of heresy against those who do not accept your opinion as to the validity of papal claimants by asserting they espouse some form of Gallicanism. This is both theologically and historically ridiculous. It is demonstrably false, hence you share a portion of the lot of those who you accuse as deceivers.
ReplyDelete