Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person.
Sister Lucy I: Missing Sister Lucy II: Impostor I can now release the overall results of the facial recognition tests that have been performed using the most up to date technology available analyzed by the most sophisticated software technicians and organized and analyzed by an expert investigator. "The only thing similar was the habit" were the words I just heard from the investigator in our phone conversation about the result. More specifics on the technicalities of the result will follow this initial announcement. On advice, I will not yet reveal the names of the investigators, the names of the companies involved, or the names of the programs being used. They are the best. They are all working on a comprehensive and definite report on the results and this will be released in the coming weeks. I want to avoid any interference in the investigation. After the final facial recognition report is complete, the second phase of the investigation will be launched whi...
I see Benedict as playing the role of pseudo-tradition restorer; JPII, the role of deceiving charismatic actor, following Paul the Destroyer and John the temporary Caretaker.
ReplyDeleteHow did JPI fit into this scheme? I read he was a modernist as well; also that he was murdered.
DeleteJust another V2 Impostor.
ReplyDeleteHe has a moral obligation to proclaim the so called secret released in 2000 was not at the very least the full 3rd secret of Fatima. Else what is the proof he himself was not deceived in 1957-1958 by the probably freemasonic replacement of Lucy? You don't have to pontificate anything, you simply have to present the evidence, then you won't have to tell anyone to "not deny."
ReplyDelete