History Channel's Presents the Blue Army's Take on Fatima. They Should Know About the True Story of Sister Lucy of Fatima. Much More Fascinating and Tragic.

-



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1QZ5BPwFng

 Dr. Chojnowski: Here is a piece by History Channel which is based upon information provided to them by the Blue Army, official NewFatima propagandists. Remember, this is the same Blue Army that published the fake letters and photos of the fake Sister Lucy as we have reported here in the past. One of their clear intents, in appearing in this History Channel interview, is to propagate the absurd idea that the Third Secret was actually revealed and that "Sister Lucy" was so disturbed that people did not accept what the nice, truthful Vatican --- which she had defended and bolstered since "Sister Lucy" first appeared on May 13th, 1967 --- would actually lie and deceive. See the History Channel episode, especially the end of the episode, where you see the clueless imposter shown tottering around, being used as the embodiment of the fake Fatima message and scenario that the Vatican has pushed. 

 I hope one day that the History Channel will realize what is happening with this fraud and present the true, and much more interesting and tragic story, of Sister Lucy of Fatima. 

Comments

  1. CatholicJanuary 7, 2020 at 11:59 PM

    Looks like the History channel have now removed it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?

-
Image
  Here are the list of the 53 Cardinals who met in Rome for the Conclave in Rome in October 1958.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_electors_for_the_1958_papal_conclave Dr. Chojnowski: This telegraph from Ambassador Zellerbach (US ambassador to Italy) and the Secretary of State of the United States under the Eisenhower administration, John Foster Dulles is a clear path mark indicating to us what we should be looking for as regards the happenings in the 1958 papal conclave that met from October 25-28, exactly 2 weeks after this telegram to the US Secretary of State was written and sent.  What do we read in this telegram and why does it matter in our investigation into the fate of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima? We do not, as of yet, have a smoking gun telegram, but this one is clearly a picture of a double-barrel shot gun loaded, locked, safety off, aimed, and finger on the trigger communication. The US government seems an imminent "threat" and it is...
Read more

Sister Lucia assassinated? Hidden? Replaced? Fatima Center Acknowledges the Existence of a Imposter Sister Lucy. Huge Breakthrough for Sister Lucy Truth.

-
Image
Here is the Just Released Statement of the Fatima Center:  Pinned by The Fatima Center @TheFatimaCenter 3 hours ago The Fatima Center's position is that it has been established with reasonable certainty that the woman presenting herself as Sister Lucia in all known public photos from 1967 onward was not the true Lucia.
Read more

Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person.

-
Image
Sister Lucy I: Missing Sister Lucy II: Impostor I can now release the overall results of the facial recognition tests that have been performed using the most up to date technology available analyzed by the most sophisticated software technicians and organized and analyzed by an expert investigator. "The only thing similar was the habit" were the words I just heard from the investigator in our phone conversation about the result. More specifics on the technicalities of the result will follow this initial announcement. On advice, I will not yet reveal the names of the investigators, the names of the companies involved, or the names of the programs being used. They are the best. They are all working on a comprehensive and definite report on the results and this will be released in the coming weeks. I want to avoid any interference in the investigation. After the final facial recognition report is complete, the second phase of the investigation will be launched whi...
Read more