Fatima Paradigm Shift Required: Watch John Vennari and Fr. Gruner Agree that Sister Lucy NEVER SPOKE ABOUT DIABOLICAL DISORIENTATION UNTIL the 60s and 70s. Since We Have Now Proven Beyond a Reasonable Doubt that the real Sister Lucy was Replaced by an Imposter after 1959, We Must Completely Reject the Diabolical Disorientation Paradigm for Understanding the Modernist Crisis.


For a Forensic Analysis that the "Sister Lucy" who spoke of "diabolical disorientation" was NOT Sister Lucy, see 
https://sisterlucyimposter.org/forensic-art/

For our expert Handwriting Analysis of the Writings of "Sister Lucy" from 1967 onwards, the period in which she spoke of "diabolical disorientation" see, https://sisterlucyimposter.org/handwriting-analysis/

For our analysis of the now proven fraud of "diabolical disorientation" see, https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=4015574537941757251#editor/target=post;postID=5693067462581469530;onPublishedMenu=allposts;onClosedMenu=allposts;postNum=4;src=postname


Comments

  1. I can't see the last blogger. It says I don't have access. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is a diabolical collusion for sure.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Paris will be burned" ---- Our Lady of La Salette: Collapsed Spire, Collapsed Catholic Civilization. How the Notre Dame Fire is an Image of the Real Church's Situation Today.

SSPX Accuses Francis of Heresy. As Far as I can tell, a "Document for Human Fraternity" that was intended to be spread throughout the world and bore the signature of Francis is a Public Act. No? So Francis is a Public Heretic or Public Apostate, No?

Amazon Facial Recognition Technology Determines that Sister Lucy I and Sister Lucy II are not the Same Person. Not One Match Amidst Thousands of Comparisons.