Is Anybody There? Does Anybody Care? Read the Latest Report from Australia's #1 Super Facial Recognizer in Which She Says that the Woman Pictured Below is Definitely NOT Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima.
 |
| Nope. |
For all the Reports Collected so far, from Handwriting Analysts, Facial Recognition Programs, Plastic Surgeons, a World-Class Forensic Artist, Orthodontists, and now, a Super Recognizer, see our sisterlucyimposter.org site with all the information.
We need all the financial help that you can give us to continue this scientific investigation into the falsification and imposture of the Seer of Fatima, Sister Lucy dos Santos, please donate to our efforts by making a tax-deductible donation via check or money order to:
Sister Lucy Truth
4104 N. Murray Dr.
Otis Orchards, WA 99027
or
https://sisterlucyimposter.org/donate/
Thank you Peter. On this great Feast of St. Ann we are reminded to be patient, as she and her noble husband Joachim were!
ReplyDeleteYou are doing a great act of charity by spearheading this research. May St Michael the Archangel guide your lance.
The Immaculate Heart sees your efforts on her behalf and so do we, your brother sheep abandoned by the shepherds who have revealed themselves as wolves.
Your work will help to overthrow Antipope Francis and his Homosexual Network Strangling the Church.
Immaculate Heart, Triumph!
Dr. Chojnowski,
ReplyDeleteThank you for all your efforts in exposing the Sr Lucy Truth.
I for one appreciate the fact that at least someone was willing to follow up on what i already suspected after reading Carmen del Tapia's book about Escriva. His visit to Tuy to meet with Lucia after she was commanded to put the Third Secret to paper and send it to her Bishop, coupled with his sly remarks about nuns in general and Sr Lucia in particular to the women of Opus Dei , contrasting that with his own account in his own book about Lucia and his meeting with her, was enough to make any reader scratch their head in disbelief.
It was so obvious Escriva was using Fatima in general and Lucia in particular to foster his own legitimacy through marketing inference to the intentions of the Mother of God, it left me literally aghast.....
Coimbria is where Lucia went in seclusion after Coimbria is where Lucia allegedly told Escriva to open the first OD House outside of Spain.
Mother Celine admitted in an interview the nuns were all Opus Dei Cooperators in the Coimbria convent........Yet according to Escriva the nuns and Lucia are all "silly women" .
Personally , I think we are all silly if we believe this Opus Dei nonsense.
The problem here, is that you are dealing with the precise opposite of Joe Friday, regardless of which end of the Novus Ordo spectrum you are talking to, because if you were arguing with people, who were just interested in 'the facts', there wouldn't be such division in the Traditionalist movement.
ReplyDeleteYou would just have Novus Ordos and sedevacantists, and that is why, basically, its only, the sedevacantists that care about this, because it provides a factual basis, in addition to theological arguments, for the idea, that from John XXIII to Francis, the Novus Ordo religion, has been ruled by men, who knew, not just what Catholicism is, but also, what the will of God is, and deliberately, set themselves against both, and that is just too much for someone who still thinks Francis is the Pope to stomach.
My advice, would be to try and find a documentary film maker, to make a film about all of this and your efforts. Its a great story. You just need to tell it in the right way.
I believe our true sister ❤️💙 Lucia is watching in spirit and hope she will be vindicated with the truth of what really happened...🕯️🌦️🏵️💝
ReplyDeleteSr Lucy pray for us, and pray for a successful conclusion to Sr Lucy Truth Project and for the safety and well-being of its instigators.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDear Sir,
DeleteThere are many reasons why I decided to not go ahead with commissioning an official analysis of the TIA "Third Secret."
1) I have only received one donation to Sister Lucy Truth from someone interested in the TIA Third Secret. The donation was a tax-deductible donation to "Sister Lucy Truth" for $200. When discussing the cost of the analysis and of writing up the results for this document, I found out that the cost was going to be $500. The document itself, with its obvious problems, did not warrant the expenditure of the extra money when we have so little to spend. Every dime donated to "Sister Lucy Truth" goes to either the investigations themselves, maintaining the website, or paying the fees to the bank for upkeep of the various accounts.
2) The document itself had a very questionable origin, we discovered this when we had 3 different people at Sister Lucy Truth actually look at the document, check it using computer programs, and look up the scriptural references that are made in the document. a) computer analysis seems to show that many of the words of the text were cut and pasted on to it. b) this document has an unknown origin --- coming from "someone in Portugal" and being advertised, other than on TIA, on a website whose address is "Our Lady is God." c) the "letter" is from a fax of a copy of the letter.
3) The date is truly odd. If you turn over the letter the year appears as 666. When has a year ever been written with 3 numbers? Also it is dated April 1st, which seems to indicate that it could very well be an "April fools" joke meant to discredit those who are genuinely interested in the actual content of the Third Secret.
4) The thumb mark, supposedly meant to prove that this is Sister Lucy's writing, was smudged. Why have a thumb print when it is smudged? How would that prove anything? Sister Lucy NEVER used a thumb print in any of her other authentic writings.
5) The biblical references, supposedly given by Our Lady in this Secret, are clearly and traditionally meant to refer to Christ and not to the Church or to the Church in our time.
6) The text is heretical since it clearly indicates that the origin of authority in the Church shall be transferred from Rome to Fatima. Rome is the Apostolic See of Peter and it would be heretical to say that that can be transferred to any other place. The pope could live in another place, as has been the case, but he is pope because he is bishop of Rome.
7) The "cathedral of Rome" is clearly misidentify as St. Peter's rather than St. John Lateran --- which is the true cathedral church of Rome. Our Lady would not misidentify this church in such a way.
8) By a description of the "church" entered into by the "pope of the evil eyes" which exactly describes the new church built at Fatima, along with mentioning the name of John Paul II, I think those who produced this document were creating foresight from hindsight.
After looking at this text intensely over the course of days, I can tell you that I believe that it is a joke, meant to discredit those who are interested in finding out the full message of the Third Secret and who have doubts about the completeness of what was released by the Vatican in 2000.