Revised and Updated Edition of Handwriting Analyst Declaration in which 1969 Letter of "Sister Lucy" Advocating Submission to Paul VI is Proven to be a Forgery. Soon to be Released on Includes Analysis of the Purported Third Secret Released in 2000. Socci's "4th Secret" Looking More Plausible. Folks, if Sister Lucy was around in 1969, she would have been able to write her own letters.

Remember, this cut and paste "Sister Lucy" appeared in a newspaper in June of 1967, one month after the event. Vaticano, come clean!
Giovanni Battista Montini, Come Out With Your Hands Up!
The letter which Bart Baggett has definitively analyzed, translated above, has proven to be a cleverly attempted FORGERY. Obviously, Paul VI had not finished using the persona of "Sister Lucy" to shut down opposition to his agenda after May 13th, 1967. Notice that in a letter of thanks to a man who gave a gift to the convent of Coimbra, she spends 80% of the letter telling you to obey probably the greatest revolutionary and Modernist in the history of the Catholic Church. Rather than being the leader of the opposition or should we say "prophet of doom," "Sister Lucy" 1969 is Paul VI's greatest defender, urging complete obedience to one who speaks for God and to object to whom means that you are separated from the Vine of the Catholic Church and face the Fires of Hell. The importance of this find cannot be overstated. 

The Revised version of the legal declaration by Mr. Bart Baggett will be released shortly on 


  1. The “Senhor Dr. Alcino” mentioned in the forged letter is the dentist Alcino Magalhães, who -according to the Portuguese diocesan presbyter Orlando José Guerra Henriques and the biography “Um caminho sob o olhar de Maria” (A path under the Mary’s glance), written by the discalced nuns of the Carmel of St. Teresa, Coimbra- had removed to Sister Lucy several damaged teeth in the year 1948 (before her departure of the Dorothean Sisters’ convent of Pontevedra), placing thereafter a dental prosthesis. Theory used by the Brazilian conciliar website ‘O Catequista’ (managed by the spouses Alexandre and Viviane Varela) to discredit (without any evidences) the substitution of the Sister Lucy of Fátima (Lucy I) by the imposter Lucy of Coimbra (Lucy II).


Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Amazon Facial Recognition Technology Determines that Sister Lucy I and Sister Lucy II are not the Same Person. Not One Match Amidst Thousands of Comparisons.

Sister Lucy Truth Update: Michigan State Facial Recognition Lab Finds that Sister Lucy II (post-1967) was NOT Sister Lucy I (pre-1967). How Much Do We Need to Put Out Until the Crickets Stop Chirping?

More Than Metaphor: Our Lady at La Salette seems to have told us not only THAT the Church would be in "Eclipse," but WHEN IT WOULD GO INTO ECLIPSE, October 27th, 1958.

Long-Standing Fatima "Consecration of Russia" Narrative Implodes as Handwriting Expert Demonstrates 1980 Letter from "Sister Lucy" to Fr. Umberto Pasquale is Definitely a Forgery. Whatever the Real Sister Lucy Knew about the Requested Consecration of Russia DOES NOT Appear in this Letter. Fatima Center, Are You Listening? Report from Bart Baggett to be Posted Imminently.

ALERT: World-Class Handwriting Analyst Demonstrates that the Writings of "Sister Lucy" from after 1957 Were Forgeries. Analysis of "Third Secret" Released by Vatican in 2000, Forged 1969 Letter Urging Obedience and Submission to Paul VI, Signatures on Letters from 1967 and 1969, Letter about Consecration of Russia From 1980, and Manuscript Released by Carmelites of Coimbra and Used as the Basis for Sister Lucy's Official Biography Published by the Blue Army WERE ALL FORGERIES. Follow the Links to the Sworn Testimony Below.