SSPX Accuses Francis of Heresy. As Far as I can tell, a "Document for Human Fraternity" that was intended to be spread throughout the world and bore the signature of Francis is a Public Act. No? So Francis is a Public Heretic or Public Apostate, No?

Francis the Heretic or
Francis the Apostate?é-superior-general-society-saint-pius-x-true-fraternity-45364?utm_source=Society+of+Saint+Pius+X+%7C+Newsletter&utm_campaign=3040eb7593-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_02_25_04_43&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_8c13eb2341-3040eb7593-206071633

I want to comment soon on the various statements that Michael Matt has made on the "situation" of the "crisis." However, before than we cannot let pass the just released statement by the SSPX on the apostasy of Francis at Abu Dhabi in which he signed a document which states that God willed the diversity of religions. Since this is a denial of the very essence of the Christian faith insofar as he is rejecting the whole purpose of the Church and the very idea of a unique Divine Revelation, originating with the preaching of the Incarnate Word and complemented by the revelation given to the Apostles by the Holy Ghost, I would argue that this is an act of apostasy. This act and such statements as "This is heresy" and "This is apostasy" should not be taking lightly. In fact, they must awaken us from our, perhaps, self-inflicted slumber. I believe this self-inflicted slumber, a spiritual melatonin, is daily administered by many of those who still hold out and hold the Catholic Faith as it has come down PRISTINE from the Apostles, the Fathers, the Popes and from the ocean of good priests and bishops that have served the Church and, hence, Jesus Christ in the past two centuries. What is the slumber? It is a dreamy feeling, that we are still in the 50s, in which we can act as if things are relatively normal and that there is a huge institution filled with well-meaning faithful who maybe be deceived on a few points --- general "liberals" --- but who, if they knew how "nice" it was in our group of faithful, would rush to embrace a better "form" of Catholicism than the one that they practice. Have we not heard the Latin Mass and the Novus Ordo compared to two trumpets, one silver and one brass, and if we are staging a great ceremony, which one would we want to have played? Such thinking was NEVER accurate and NEVER described the situation in the world which the faithful Catholic actually lives in now. 
If we are awake, what is the situation in which we find ourselves in? We are confronted with a world in which the presence of the Catholic Church --- in its real teaching and morals, and even cultural influence --- has disappeared. The whole of Christendom, a civilization which HAD AS ITS PRIMARY PURPOSE TO CENTER LIFE AROUND THE LIFE AND GRACE OF THE Catholic Church --- is gone. We find ourselves in a world totally indifferent to God, Jesus Christ, and the claims of the Catholic Church. Only the sexual escapades and crimes of clerics, whether validly or invalidly consecrated or ordained, are at the forefront of peoples' minds. 
This cultural, political, economic, and social disappearance of the Church "compliments" the wiping away of the reality of the Catholic Church in the "Declaration on Human Fraternity" and its substitution by a institution, with only an accidental relationship to the Catholic Church founded by Christ, which now denies its own doctrines, its own history, its own necessity, its own morals and promises to work for the world envisioned and demanded by every enemy that the Church has had in modern times. The institution, the parts that still stand, are being used to advance an anti-christ world that is an insult hurled into the face of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Master and King of All Men and Nations. 
How should faithful Catholics respond to this unprecedented situation? Let me wait until I comment on the latest from Michael Matt, longtime champion of "We can work this out, if we have our Latin Mass."


  1. Michael Matt feeds on the illusion that it is enough to restore the Tridentine rite to renew Christ's Church. After all, the Vaticanum II' were conducted by prelates who did not know another mass as the one in the old rite! What we are currently observing in the Roman Catholic church is not a crisis, but an epochal breakthrough.
    The last papal decisions of Joseph Raztinger's led to the transformation of the Saint Peter's Office into a synodal two-headed hybrid. Actually he dissolved - by virtue of power given to him [Mat 16, 19] by Jesus Christ - the same office on Feb. 28, 2013 at 8 p.m. [CET], so no he may already be a Roman pope neither himself nor anyone else. The dissolution of the papacy does not mean that the gates of hell have overcome the Church [Mat 16, 18]. The Church will be reborn with the power of God as it was when the Mosaic religion degenerated into the form of the synagogue of Satan and Jesus Christ appeared to breathe new life into the Church of God and raise it to a higher level thrugh the Holy Sacraments.
    By the act of Feb. 11, 2013, Benedict16 released the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven. These Keys are the Apocalyptic Woman and the Paraclete; only now the Church will shine on the whole earth with full splendor.

    The end of the papacy in Rome is precisely described in the Prophecy of Saint Malachi (+ 1148), archbishop of Armagh:

    'Gloria Olivae' - Benedict 16; the glory/finial of the Roman Catholic church are two olive trees [Rev. 11, 4], which will blossom only now at the end of times - the Paraclete and the Woman of the Revelation.

    'In persecutione extrema S.R.E. sedebit' - this is the phenomenon of Jorge Bergoglio, the destroyer of the Roman Catholic church. Bergoglio, aside from the BXVI's dissolution of the papacy, as an apostate, could not be the vicar of Jesus Christ, and therefore Saint Malachi does not name his name among the Pontifex but only characterizes the effects of his actions.

    'Petrus Romanus, qui pascet oves in multis tribulationibus: quibus transactis civitas septicollis diruetur & Iudex tremendus iudicabit populum suum. Finis.'
    Saint Peter the Apostle was not Roman (citizen of Rome). Peter the Roman is the Son of a Roman Catholic church (means a Roman) and is identical to a terrible Judge, the same as the Paraclete.

  2. Excellent article! Francis is definitely an apostate. There's no doubt about it. The problem with the SSPX/R+R and others is that they appear to have a sort of dissociative amnesia. It mentally separates them from their bad memories of Francis and his long, on-going history of blasphemy, heresy, and apostasy. Every time Francis commits a heresy, they act as if it's for the very first time. Then the whining starts, the petitions for the "Holy Father" to please stop, and the lame SSPX communiques. Over and over and over again. They're just fooling themselves, thinking that they're doing some good for the Church, when they are really a huge part of the problem.

    1. "the lame SSPX communiques."

      Indeed ... wimpy, effeminate. No Church Militant with the SSPX, all in keeping with the re-branding of the SSPX, courtesy of Bishop Fellay and Fr. Wegner. Let's hire a pagan PR firm to "market" the Society of St. Pius X. Make your bed with the devil.

      14 Bear not the yoke with unbelievers. For what participation hath justice with injustice? Or what fellowship hath light with darkness?
      15 And what concord hath Christ with Belial? Or what part hath the faithful with the unbeliever?
      16 And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? For you are the temple of the living God; as God saith: I will dwell in them, and walk among them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.
      17 Wherefore, Go out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing:
      18 And I will receive you; and I will be a Father to you; and you shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.
      2 Corinthians 6:14-18

    2. Totally agree. Francis could publicly worship the devil and they would still offer their Mass in union with him and say that "no one can say he is a heretic".

    3. Dear brother Catholic, George from Buenos Aires already has manifested himself as a worshipper if the devil when he presided over the most holy Sacrifice of the Mass with a Stang for a crozier. And you’re right most folks would rather ignore it. I hear: You’re not sure that’s a Stang are you? What’s a Stang anyway? Where’d you read that or get that information?

      It’s the mentality of refusal to see, of the Pharisees in their interrogation of the Man Born Blind.

      Man Born Blind Sybdrome.

  3. It took the SSPX three weeks to draft this communique. Pathetic!

    Of course Francis is a public heretic!

    But in the SSPX world, he’s not, because although one can accuse him of *heresy*, that does not necessarily make him a *heretic* (same goes for Ratzinger, etc), because one has to be really sure of their pertinacity (50+ years is not long enough!), blah, blah, blah… excuses, excuses, excuses...

  4. "I say only that if you are receiving a head of State, and you have the choice between a silver trumpet and a brass trumpet, would you choose the brass trumpet? It would be an insult. You would not do it. Even the best New Masses are like trumpets of brass, in comparison to the traditional liturgy. For God, we would choose what is better." Bishop Fellay's June 30th, 2018 interview with Die Tagespost

  5. It is amazing that no matter what the SSPX says it is never enough for the rabid " resistance" bunch. The only thing that unites the "resistance" is their hatred for the SSPX. " Then the whining(of the resistance) starts...over and over and over again.They are just fooling themselves thinking that they're doing some good for the church, when they are really a huge part of the problem"

    1. Thanks, Anonymous, but I'm *not* with the "resistance". And what's this thing about "hatred for the SSPX"? Come on now. We love everybody! I just happen to agree with Dr. Chojnowski 100%. We don't need to follow a "bunch" to know that an apostate can't be Pope of the Catholic Church. But you're right about one thing: "no matter what the SSPX says it is never enough". They need to tell the truth.

  6. Interesting stuff, Anonymous. Let me see if I understand you, because if I do, you have clarified this last prophecy of St. Malachy: "The last persecution is the one that Antipope Francis is subjecting the Church to right now. And in the midst of these tribulations from a false pope there will arise a true Pope, named Peter the Roman, who will be the one pasturing the sheep." This prophecy has been confusing to me since the election of Bergoglio. Now you are making sense of it. (One dissenting opinion: St. Malachy does have a couple of antipopes on his list, I believe.)

    Of course the question remains, who is Peter the Roman and when and by whom will he be elected? I do not see how the next papal conclave will not result in a schism. Truly utterly dire times.

    1. "St. Malachy does have a couple of antipopes on his list, I believe."
      That's right, but all known antipopes were Catholics and did not preach heresy. Cardinals were divided into factions and it was not known who the pope was. Jesus allowed this to prepare us for the present situation, when we ask: where is our Shepherd?
      Bergoglio is a completely different quality: an apostate, Satan's tool, consciously destroys the Roman Catholic church.
      The world episcopate supports him actively or passively. For six years, there was not a single bishop who would inflict an anathema on the usurper. So the entire hierarchy is worth as much as their sodom leader. As such, they are no longer capable to elect a Pope. The papacy in Rome ended definitively and irrevocably on February 28, 2013 at exactly 8 p.m. [CET].
      Peter the Romans is someone of divine and not human choice. Although he is the son of the Roman Catholic church, the mature fruit of the tree that our Lord Jesus Christ planted, he exceeds our human imagination about the only Shepherd of the one flock. He is identical with the Paraclete promised by Our Lord.

    2. Fred we are in schism already. It’s George the Mad’s intention as he himself whimsically mused: “I may well go down in history as the ‘pope’ who brought schism to the Church.”

  7. Agreed!! The spiritual apathy of the SSPX can be measured by the feebleness of their communique. Thank you, Fathers, for pointing out that if someone contradicts the First Commandment, it's called a "heresy". And this word is taken lightly. Good grief! They've tamed Francis' act of apostasy and stripped it of it's meaning. Once again reality becomes blah-blah-blah. When are the SSPX going to do something useful, such as admit that Francis is not a real pope?

    1. If someone denies the first commandment, it is more than heresy… it is idolatry… ecumenism is a sin against the first commandment: Thou shalt not have false gods before Me.... It is an apostasy.

  8. Bergoglian "catholics" (whether traditional, novus ordo or anything else in between) and the sedevacantist "catholics" all have one thing in common. They've left the church by recognizing a false pope (Bergoglio) who is, de facto, not a legitimate superior of the church and does not hold the MUNUS. Their liturgies are void of all divine element, with no real presence and void of grace. There is no divine communion in the Holy Trinity, for the Holy Trinity has but one legitimate Vicar of Christ on earth and that is Pope Benedict XVI whom without there is NO Eucharist.

    Although there is an apparent human communion in Bergoglio's anti-church, it only consists on the fact that everyone does the same thing together (externally), and pretends that everything is the same as it was left when the Holy Father withdrew from the active ministry, but there is no divine communion as there is no legitimate Petrine authority to be the pontiff between the Earthly Bride and the Heavenly Spouse to offer the holy prayer of the Church to our Lord, the Holy Trinity.

    If you need proof of this, please read the following posts and refute, especially the posts in links #3 & #4.


    1. "Their liturgies are void of all divine element, with no real presence and void of grace."

      Eucharistic miracles in Legnica (Poland) on December 25, 2013 and in the native Argentina of Bergoglio in Rafaela (Santa Fe province) on April 11, 2017 prove that the Daily Sacrifice is taking place. Our Lord Jesus Christ is still present on the altars of the world. However, the time is fast approaching when the Daily Sacrifice will stop for a period of three and a half years.

    2. Em S,

      I agree that private Catholic revelation leads one to the conclusion that Benedict is likely the pope. In the great Western schism we have people who recognized a false pope and who are now canonized saints. The only way any of those you mentioned are not Catholic, is if they deny a doctrine of the ordinary infallible magisterium or if they deny a dogma of the extraordinary universal infallible magisterium. You will notice many of the differences between the different traditional tribes is usually theology still in the state of allowed disputance, not dealt with by any level of the magisterium including the authentic fallible magisterium. Or, sometimes only dealt with by a magisterium that the right to withdraw obedience from already existed as is the case with pope John Paul II saying the Anglican bastard (conceived in sin) rite is valid if used by a Catholic priest intending to do what the Catholic Church intends to do with such a sacramental rite.

  9. Benedict XVI is truly an excellent example of a dyed-in-the-wool heretic and apostate. Who do you think you're kidding? Go read all about Benny on novusordowatch.

    1. Yes Benedict XVI was a true antichrist is his actions and writings. It seems as if people will come up with any excuse to not have to consider sedevacantism as a legitimate option.


  10. Sedevacantism is not a legitimate Catholic option due to the Petrine promise and all its implications. Is it not historical fact that all split among yourselves just like any other Protestant sect. It’s plain to see.

    There’s still one Faith; there’s still one Pope. Thus there’s still hope.

    Christ created the papacy. No man can expand, enlarge, shrink, change one whit or bifurcate its nature.

    That Pope Benedict may have tried is ineffective. He’s still Pope Benedict.

    And yes there have been lots of Antipopes in history, and by and large they’ve all been Catholic—unlike Bergoglio.

    Also agreed on the utter worthlessness and failure of the hierarchy at large in opposition to Antipope Francis the Apostate. Only +Viganò has done anything worth a darn. And even he calls Antipope Francis the Apostate “pope!”

    Despite these calamities (including Ratzinger’s flirt w modernism), sedevacantism cannot be the solution for a Catholic man.

    Now Our Lady of Fatima, that’s another story. She can right the Ship in a heartbeat.

    1. Christ has never promised that we would always have a pope on the Seat of Rome… He promised that a real pope (and I am saying a real pope because he must meet conditions in order to be one) would be assisted by the Holy Ghost, would be assisted by Christ's power of authority, and would not be able to promulgate heresy to the whole Church - what use would be the Church in that case.
      A true pope, to be one, must hold and live the doctrinal teachings of Jesus Christ - spread by the apostles and supported by the Church. He cannot be a heretic, an idolater…. etc...

      We cannot say that this is the case for the last anti-popes beginning with John XXIII whom all participate in the destruction of tradition.

    2. There has been antipopes in the Church, but once recognized, they were excommunicated…. and out of the Church… and the Church proceeded with the election of another vicar of Christ… You cannot be a heretic and be a pope…. impossible….You don't hold the true faith… you excommunicate yourself, you put yourself outside of the Church… and as a result cannot lead the Church… he loses the authority to govern, to sanctify souls and to defend the true apostolic teachings… Benedict does not hold the true faith…. He does not believe in the eucharist, does not believe in the resurrection of Christ and the resurrection of the bodies… which is part of our creed… he believes that Jews still have a covenant with God.. that they don't need the redemption of Christ and that the Old Testament still stands for them today… that Christ's new covenant does not stand for them…. This is apostasy…. He is not a pope… whether elections could have been valid or not… St Bellarmin, sj attests to this…

    3. If sedevacantism is not the solution, than what is it? It is indeed the best solution… it does not deny the authority of the pope… because a sedevacantist recognizes a pope and obeys, when there is indeed one sitting on the seat of Rome, and does not recognize a man to be pope and yet disobey him under the pretext that his teachings are heretical… that is schismatic attitude. If you truly believe that Ratzinger is pope, than you must obey… that is a condition for salvation.. Sedevacantists recognize that there is no pope… the seat of Rome is vacant, just like the position after the death of a pope, before the election of the next... This position has always been recognized by the Catholic teachings...

    4. Brother Beowulf, "Sedevacantism" = Catholicism. In fact, it should not even be called sedevacantism, it is just pure and simple Catholicism. And to prove my point, I would ask what doctrine or dogma of the faith does a sedevacantist reject? No one can give one, because there isn't one. Also, contrary to the lies circulating, we are not Protestant. We do not protest to the authority of the pope, we are, in fact, the only ones upholding it. The SSPX and Resistance do constantly contradict and protest to the authority of the pope and have deviated into protestant beliefs and soon they will deviate into protestant practices also. This naturally occurs because they have no authority to turn to. May Our Lady bless you with the light to understand this.

    5. I'd like to add a reminder about what happened at the '58 conclave. A pope was elected. The white smoke went up and no pope appeared. Everyone in the world was waiting for this pope to appear and he did not. Instead, black smoke appeared. WHERE DID THEY TAKE OUR POPE? They instead put forth an impostor, "John XXIII", a man "suspect of the heresy of Modernism" by the Holy Office, a man who put forth a pseudo-Council called Vatican II and all the while this was happening WHERE IS OUR POPE. Our Lady of Fatima said that the pope would "suffer much". We have a right to know what happened to Sr Lucy and why they replaced her with an impostor and we have a right to know WHERE IS OUR POPE. We have had enough of the Papal impostors and we Catholics are angry. I hope we are angry enough to do PRAYER AND PENANCE that was asked for by Our good and dear Lady at Fatima, our mother.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?

Tragic Disappearance of the Real Sister Lucy dos Santos Foretold to Jacinta, Right Before She Died, by the Blessed Virgin Mary. Contrary to being Safely Stowed in a Convent, Sister Lucy's Life was Always Under Threat.

Sister Lucia assassinated? Hidden? Replaced? Fatima Center Acknowledges the Existence of a Imposter Sister Lucy. Huge Breakthrough for Sister Lucy Truth.