SSPX Accuses Francis of Heresy. As Far as I can tell, a "Document for Human Fraternity" that was intended to be spread throughout the world and bore the signature of Francis is a Public Act. No? So Francis is a Public Heretic or Public Apostate, No?

Francis the Heretic or
Francis the Apostate?

https://fsspx.news/en/news-events/news/communiqué-superior-general-society-saint-pius-x-true-fraternity-45364?utm_source=Society+of+Saint+Pius+X+%7C+Newsletter&utm_campaign=3040eb7593-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_02_25_04_43&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_8c13eb2341-3040eb7593-206071633

I want to comment soon on the various statements that Michael Matt has made on the "situation" of the "crisis." However, before than we cannot let pass the just released statement by the SSPX on the apostasy of Francis at Abu Dhabi in which he signed a document which states that God willed the diversity of religions. Since this is a denial of the very essence of the Christian faith insofar as he is rejecting the whole purpose of the Church and the very idea of a unique Divine Revelation, originating with the preaching of the Incarnate Word and complemented by the revelation given to the Apostles by the Holy Ghost, I would argue that this is an act of apostasy. This act and such statements as "This is heresy" and "This is apostasy" should not be taking lightly. In fact, they must awaken us from our, perhaps, self-inflicted slumber. I believe this self-inflicted slumber, a spiritual melatonin, is daily administered by many of those who still hold out and hold the Catholic Faith as it has come down PRISTINE from the Apostles, the Fathers, the Popes and from the ocean of good priests and bishops that have served the Church and, hence, Jesus Christ in the past two centuries. What is the slumber? It is a dreamy feeling, that we are still in the 50s, in which we can act as if things are relatively normal and that there is a huge institution filled with well-meaning faithful who maybe be deceived on a few points --- general "liberals" --- but who, if they knew how "nice" it was in our group of faithful, would rush to embrace a better "form" of Catholicism than the one that they practice. Have we not heard the Latin Mass and the Novus Ordo compared to two trumpets, one silver and one brass, and if we are staging a great ceremony, which one would we want to have played? Such thinking was NEVER accurate and NEVER described the situation in the world which the faithful Catholic actually lives in now. 
If we are awake, what is the situation in which we find ourselves in? We are confronted with a world in which the presence of the Catholic Church --- in its real teaching and morals, and even cultural influence --- has disappeared. The whole of Christendom, a civilization which HAD AS ITS PRIMARY PURPOSE TO CENTER LIFE AROUND THE LIFE AND GRACE OF THE Catholic Church --- is gone. We find ourselves in a world totally indifferent to God, Jesus Christ, and the claims of the Catholic Church. Only the sexual escapades and crimes of clerics, whether validly or invalidly consecrated or ordained, are at the forefront of peoples' minds. 
This cultural, political, economic, and social disappearance of the Church "compliments" the wiping away of the reality of the Catholic Church in the "Declaration on Human Fraternity" and its substitution by a institution, with only an accidental relationship to the Catholic Church founded by Christ, which now denies its own doctrines, its own history, its own necessity, its own morals and promises to work for the world envisioned and demanded by every enemy that the Church has had in modern times. The institution, the parts that still stand, are being used to advance an anti-christ world that is an insult hurled into the face of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Master and King of All Men and Nations. 
How should faithful Catholics respond to this unprecedented situation? Let me wait until I comment on the latest from Michael Matt, longtime champion of "We can work this out, if we have our Latin Mass."

Comments

  1. Michael Matt feeds on the illusion that it is enough to restore the Tridentine rite to renew Christ's Church. After all, the Vaticanum II' were conducted by prelates who did not know another mass as the one in the old rite! What we are currently observing in the Roman Catholic church is not a crisis, but an epochal breakthrough.
    The last papal decisions of Joseph Raztinger's led to the transformation of the Saint Peter's Office into a synodal two-headed hybrid. Actually he dissolved - by virtue of power given to him [Mat 16, 19] by Jesus Christ - the same office on Feb. 28, 2013 at 8 p.m. [CET], so no he may already be a Roman pope neither himself nor anyone else. The dissolution of the papacy does not mean that the gates of hell have overcome the Church [Mat 16, 18]. The Church will be reborn with the power of God as it was when the Mosaic religion degenerated into the form of the synagogue of Satan and Jesus Christ appeared to breathe new life into the Church of God and raise it to a higher level thrugh the Holy Sacraments.
    By the act of Feb. 11, 2013, Benedict16 released the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven. These Keys are the Apocalyptic Woman and the Paraclete; only now the Church will shine on the whole earth with full splendor.

    The end of the papacy in Rome is precisely described in the Prophecy of Saint Malachi (+ 1148), archbishop of Armagh:

    'Gloria Olivae' - Benedict 16; the glory/finial of the Roman Catholic church are two olive trees [Rev. 11, 4], which will blossom only now at the end of times - the Paraclete and the Woman of the Revelation.

    'In persecutione extrema S.R.E. sedebit' - this is the phenomenon of Jorge Bergoglio, the destroyer of the Roman Catholic church. Bergoglio, aside from the BXVI's dissolution of the papacy, as an apostate, could not be the vicar of Jesus Christ, and therefore Saint Malachi does not name his name among the Pontifex but only characterizes the effects of his actions.

    'Petrus Romanus, qui pascet oves in multis tribulationibus: quibus transactis civitas septicollis diruetur & Iudex tremendus iudicabit populum suum. Finis.'
    Saint Peter the Apostle was not Roman (citizen of Rome). Peter the Roman is the Son of a Roman Catholic church (means a Roman) and is identical to a terrible Judge, the same as the Paraclete.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent article! Francis is definitely an apostate. There's no doubt about it. The problem with the SSPX/R+R and others is that they appear to have a sort of dissociative amnesia. It mentally separates them from their bad memories of Francis and his long, on-going history of blasphemy, heresy, and apostasy. Every time Francis commits a heresy, they act as if it's for the very first time. Then the whining starts, the petitions for the "Holy Father" to please stop, and the lame SSPX communiques. Over and over and over again. They're just fooling themselves, thinking that they're doing some good for the Church, when they are really a huge part of the problem.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "the lame SSPX communiques."

      Indeed ... wimpy, effeminate. No Church Militant with the SSPX, all in keeping with the re-branding of the SSPX, courtesy of Bishop Fellay and Fr. Wegner. Let's hire a pagan PR firm to "market" the Society of St. Pius X. Make your bed with the devil.

      14 Bear not the yoke with unbelievers. For what participation hath justice with injustice? Or what fellowship hath light with darkness?
      15 And what concord hath Christ with Belial? Or what part hath the faithful with the unbeliever?
      16 And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? For you are the temple of the living God; as God saith: I will dwell in them, and walk among them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.
      17 Wherefore, Go out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing:
      18 And I will receive you; and I will be a Father to you; and you shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.
      2 Corinthians 6:14-18

      Delete
    2. Totally agree. Francis could publicly worship the devil and they would still offer their Mass in union with him and say that "no one can say he is a heretic".

      Delete
    3. Dear brother Catholic, George from Buenos Aires already has manifested himself as a worshipper if the devil when he presided over the most holy Sacrifice of the Mass with a Stang for a crozier. And you’re right most folks would rather ignore it. I hear: You’re not sure that’s a Stang are you? What’s a Stang anyway? Where’d you read that or get that information?

      It’s the mentality of refusal to see, of the Pharisees in their interrogation of the Man Born Blind.

      Man Born Blind Sybdrome.

      Delete
  3. It took the SSPX three weeks to draft this communique. Pathetic!

    Of course Francis is a public heretic!

    But in the SSPX world, he’s not, because although one can accuse him of *heresy*, that does not necessarily make him a *heretic* (same goes for Ratzinger, etc), because one has to be really sure of their pertinacity (50+ years is not long enough!), blah, blah, blah… excuses, excuses, excuses...

    ReplyDelete
  4. "I say only that if you are receiving a head of State, and you have the choice between a silver trumpet and a brass trumpet, would you choose the brass trumpet? It would be an insult. You would not do it. Even the best New Masses are like trumpets of brass, in comparison to the traditional liturgy. For God, we would choose what is better." Bishop Fellay's June 30th, 2018 interview with Die Tagespost

    ReplyDelete
  5. It is amazing that no matter what the SSPX says it is never enough for the rabid " resistance" bunch. The only thing that unites the "resistance" is their hatred for the SSPX. " Then the whining(of the resistance) starts...over and over and over again.They are just fooling themselves thinking that they're doing some good for the church, when they are really a huge part of the problem"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Anonymous, but I'm *not* with the "resistance". And what's this thing about "hatred for the SSPX"? Come on now. We love everybody! I just happen to agree with Dr. Chojnowski 100%. We don't need to follow a "bunch" to know that an apostate can't be Pope of the Catholic Church. But you're right about one thing: "no matter what the SSPX says it is never enough". They need to tell the truth.

      Delete
  6. Interesting stuff, Anonymous. Let me see if I understand you, because if I do, you have clarified this last prophecy of St. Malachy: "The last persecution is the one that Antipope Francis is subjecting the Church to right now. And in the midst of these tribulations from a false pope there will arise a true Pope, named Peter the Roman, who will be the one pasturing the sheep." This prophecy has been confusing to me since the election of Bergoglio. Now you are making sense of it. (One dissenting opinion: St. Malachy does have a couple of antipopes on his list, I believe.)

    Of course the question remains, who is Peter the Roman and when and by whom will he be elected? I do not see how the next papal conclave will not result in a schism. Truly utterly dire times.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "St. Malachy does have a couple of antipopes on his list, I believe."
      That's right, but all known antipopes were Catholics and did not preach heresy. Cardinals were divided into factions and it was not known who the pope was. Jesus allowed this to prepare us for the present situation, when we ask: where is our Shepherd?
      Bergoglio is a completely different quality: an apostate, Satan's tool, consciously destroys the Roman Catholic church.
      The world episcopate supports him actively or passively. For six years, there was not a single bishop who would inflict an anathema on the usurper. So the entire hierarchy is worth as much as their sodom leader. As such, they are no longer capable to elect a Pope. The papacy in Rome ended definitively and irrevocably on February 28, 2013 at exactly 8 p.m. [CET].
      Peter the Romans is someone of divine and not human choice. Although he is the son of the Roman Catholic church, the mature fruit of the tree that our Lord Jesus Christ planted, he exceeds our human imagination about the only Shepherd of the one flock. He is identical with the Paraclete promised by Our Lord.

      Delete
    2. Fred we are in schism already. It’s George the Mad’s intention as he himself whimsically mused: “I may well go down in history as the ‘pope’ who brought schism to the Church.”

      Delete
  7. Agreed!! The spiritual apathy of the SSPX can be measured by the feebleness of their communique. Thank you, Fathers, for pointing out that if someone contradicts the First Commandment, it's called a "heresy". And this word is taken lightly. Good grief! They've tamed Francis' act of apostasy and stripped it of it's meaning. Once again reality becomes blah-blah-blah. When are the SSPX going to do something useful, such as admit that Francis is not a real pope?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bergoglian "catholics" (whether traditional, novus ordo or anything else in between) and the sedevacantist "catholics" all have one thing in common. They've left the church by recognizing a false pope (Bergoglio) who is, de facto, not a legitimate superior of the church and does not hold the MUNUS. Their liturgies are void of all divine element, with no real presence and void of grace. There is no divine communion in the Holy Trinity, for the Holy Trinity has but one legitimate Vicar of Christ on earth and that is Pope Benedict XVI whom without there is NO Eucharist.

    Although there is an apparent human communion in Bergoglio's anti-church, it only consists on the fact that everyone does the same thing together (externally), and pretends that everything is the same as it was left when the Holy Father withdrew from the active ministry, but there is no divine communion as there is no legitimate Petrine authority to be the pontiff between the Earthly Bride and the Heavenly Spouse to offer the holy prayer of the Church to our Lord, the Holy Trinity.

    If you need proof of this, please read the following posts and refute, especially the posts in links #3 & #4.

    1. http://www.godsplanforlife.org/pastoral/antichurch.html
    2. https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2018/11/19/the-validity-of-pope-benedict-vxis-resignation-must-be-questioned/
    3. https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2018/12/26/the-validity-of-benedicts-resignation-part-ii-ad-contrarium/
    4. https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2019/02/25/no-excuse-before-god-or-the-church/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Their liturgies are void of all divine element, with no real presence and void of grace."

      Eucharistic miracles in Legnica (Poland) on December 25, 2013 and in the native Argentina of Bergoglio in Rafaela (Santa Fe province) on April 11, 2017 prove that the Daily Sacrifice is taking place. Our Lord Jesus Christ is still present on the altars of the world. However, the time is fast approaching when the Daily Sacrifice will stop for a period of three and a half years.

      Delete
    2. Em S,

      I agree that private Catholic revelation leads one to the conclusion that Benedict is likely the pope. In the great Western schism we have people who recognized a false pope and who are now canonized saints. The only way any of those you mentioned are not Catholic, is if they deny a doctrine of the ordinary infallible magisterium or if they deny a dogma of the extraordinary universal infallible magisterium. You will notice many of the differences between the different traditional tribes is usually theology still in the state of allowed disputance, not dealt with by any level of the magisterium including the authentic fallible magisterium. Or, sometimes only dealt with by a magisterium that the right to withdraw obedience from already existed as is the case with pope John Paul II saying the Anglican bastard (conceived in sin) rite is valid if used by a Catholic priest intending to do what the Catholic Church intends to do with such a sacramental rite.

      Delete
  9. Benedict XVI is truly an excellent example of a dyed-in-the-wool heretic and apostate. Who do you think you're kidding? Go read all about Benny on novusordowatch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes Benedict XVI was a true antichrist is his actions and writings. It seems as if people will come up with any excuse to not have to consider sedevacantism as a legitimate option.
      Paul

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Amazon Facial Recognition Technology Determines that Sister Lucy I and Sister Lucy II are not the Same Person. Not One Match Amidst Thousands of Comparisons.

Sister Lucy Truth Update: Michigan State Facial Recognition Lab Finds that Sister Lucy II (post-1967) was NOT Sister Lucy I (pre-1967). How Much Do We Need to Put Out Until the Crickets Stop Chirping?

More Than Metaphor: Our Lady at La Salette seems to have told us not only THAT the Church would be in "Eclipse," but WHEN IT WOULD GO INTO ECLIPSE, October 27th, 1958.

Long-Standing Fatima "Consecration of Russia" Narrative Implodes as Handwriting Expert Demonstrates 1980 Letter from "Sister Lucy" to Fr. Umberto Pasquale is Definitely a Forgery. Whatever the Real Sister Lucy Knew about the Requested Consecration of Russia DOES NOT Appear in this Letter. Fatima Center, Are You Listening? Report from Bart Baggett to be Posted Imminently.

ALERT: World-Class Handwriting Analyst Demonstrates that the Writings of "Sister Lucy" from after 1957 Were Forgeries. Analysis of "Third Secret" Released by Vatican in 2000, Forged 1969 Letter Urging Obedience and Submission to Paul VI, Signatures on Letters from 1967 and 1969, Letter about Consecration of Russia From 1980, and Manuscript Released by Carmelites of Coimbra and Used as the Basis for Sister Lucy's Official Biography Published by the Blue Army WERE ALL FORGERIES. Follow the Links to the Sworn Testimony Below.

...una cum famulo tuo Michahel Matt et Christophorus Ferrara....Isn't it Strange How Francis Could Watch Athanasius Schneider Participate in the Matt/FSSP Catholic Identity Crisis Conference, without Censure or Disciplinary Action, Even Though Matt has Said that the "Remnant" "No longer accepts the Vatican of Pope Francis as a moral authority in ANYTHING." Strange. Just Sayin'

Revised and Updated Edition of Handwriting Analyst Declaration in which 1969 Letter of "Sister Lucy" Advocating Submission to Paul VI is Proven to be a Forgery. Soon to be Released on SisterLucyimposter.org. Includes Analysis of the Purported Third Secret Released in 2000. Socci's "4th Secret" Looking More Plausible. Folks, if Sister Lucy was around in 1969, she would have been able to write her own letters.