Yawn! Nothing to See Here! The Fatima Center's Response to Reader's Inquiry About the Sister Lucy Truth Project.

That the Seer of Fatima was Replaced by an Impostor for Some 50 years........Who Cares! 

Here is the Fatima Center's Response to One of Our Readers. Seems Like a Bit of a Form Letter to Me. Maybe This Was Not Their First Such Inquiry?

On Oct 26, 2018, at 2:31 PM, Jen Timmins <JTimmins@thefatimacenter.com> wrote:


Thank you for your email dated September 9, 2018. We are sorry to hear that you are dissatisfied with the us at the Fatima Center.

Regarding the so called Sister Lucy conspiracy; Father Gruner was certainly aware of the situation. He mentioned that he needed more proof, that he wasn't going to just read and believe what was on the internet. 

His first thought was that "people" were possibly spreading this new story about Sister Lucia to take away from the importance of the Fatima Message. Father Gruner spent some time investigating, and spoke with her family members, who informed him that Sister Lucia's sister had in fact received a letter from Sister Lucia a year before she passed away.

But regardless of all this, the consecration of Russia still needs to be done, and the full secret of Fatima needs to be revealed in its entirety.

Our Lady of Fatima, knows we are trying our best to continue Father Gruner's efforts, to try and spread the truth of the Fatima Message, and the teachings of the Catholic Faith.

Please be assured of the daily prayers of Our Lady of Fatima’s Apostolate for you and your intentions and we ask that you continue to remember our work in your prayers. May God bless you and may Our Heavenly Mother Mary draw you ever closer to Her Divine Son Jesus.

Rachelle Eller
The Fatima Center | Canada
452 Kraft Rd., Fort Erie, ON L2A 4M7
Toll-free 1.800.263.8160 | Direct Line: 905.871.7607


  1. Wouldn't it be interesting if the Sr. Lucy Truth project were able to somehow obtain the original letter that Ms. Eller refers to (assuming that it was hand-written and that the family would share it) for a forensic handwriting analysis? Based on the evidence already provided on the facial analysis, if I were Sr. Lucy's family member I would certainly want it done.

    And don't you just love the use of the "conspiracy" label right out of the gate? Thanks to the CIA post-JFK assassination, they've completely redefined this word to mean "kook". It seems like all we hear from the naysayers' camp regarding the imposter Sr. Lucy is either ad hominem attacks on the messengers or their own "evidence" that is thin at best.

  2. Yawn, and a bigger yawn....sure who cares if the Faith of the Apostles was replaced by con men of the rabbinical- jesuitical persuasion. What difference does it make if Montini carried the ephod of Caiphas, or that JP2 had a mantle of the Jewish High Priesthood made esp. for him for the jubilee year or that Ratzinger had 13 rabbis on his mother's side. Nothing to see here. The goyim always deserved to have his faith stolen. Now we have a full blown rabbinical jesuit at the helm who doesn't in the least care about putting on any disguises and a surrounding jesuitical horror show. They pull deceptions (shooting of JP2) and eliminating Lucy as part and parcel of the circus act. They own and operate the media and the so called opposition. At this hour I think Vigano is real and they are desperate to find and eliminate him.
    Note: There have been at least two Francis friendly publications that have referred to him as the successor to Christ....not Peter.

  3. Actually it does look like a form letter. Too shocking to be real! This prophecy keeps coming to mind, "when all seems lost and paralysed... this will be, then, the happy beginning of the complete restoration." Lets hope and pray and be prepared.

  4. I'm going out on a limb by saying when they find that letter from Sr. Lucia to her sister, it will turn out to be TYPEWRITTEN. But her sister, who knew Lucia never learned to type, just overlooked that detail because she wanted to believe that she was really getting a letter from her own dear sister.
    That's the kind of thing that would fit right in to this whole mess.

  5. 1)Although I believe she is a fraud, no one in the NO sect will care.
    2) Isn't it 100 years too late to consecrate Russia?


Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Amazon Facial Recognition Technology Determines that Sister Lucy I and Sister Lucy II are not the Same Person. Not One Match Amidst Thousands of Comparisons.

Sister Lucy Truth Update: Michigan State Facial Recognition Lab Finds that Sister Lucy II (post-1967) was NOT Sister Lucy I (pre-1967). How Much Do We Need to Put Out Until the Crickets Stop Chirping?

More Than Metaphor: Our Lady at La Salette seems to have told us not only THAT the Church would be in "Eclipse," but WHEN IT WOULD GO INTO ECLIPSE, October 27th, 1958.

Long-Standing Fatima "Consecration of Russia" Narrative Implodes as Handwriting Expert Demonstrates 1980 Letter from "Sister Lucy" to Fr. Umberto Pasquale is Definitely a Forgery. Whatever the Real Sister Lucy Knew about the Requested Consecration of Russia DOES NOT Appear in this Letter. Fatima Center, Are You Listening? Report from Bart Baggett to be Posted Imminently.

ALERT: World-Class Handwriting Analyst Demonstrates that the Writings of "Sister Lucy" from after 1957 Were Forgeries. Analysis of "Third Secret" Released by Vatican in 2000, Forged 1969 Letter Urging Obedience and Submission to Paul VI, Signatures on Letters from 1967 and 1969, Letter about Consecration of Russia From 1980, and Manuscript Released by Carmelites of Coimbra and Used as the Basis for Sister Lucy's Official Biography Published by the Blue Army WERE ALL FORGERIES. Follow the Links to the Sworn Testimony Below.

Revised and Updated Edition of Handwriting Analyst Declaration in which 1969 Letter of "Sister Lucy" Advocating Submission to Paul VI is Proven to be a Forgery. Soon to be Released on SisterLucyimposter.org. Includes Analysis of the Purported Third Secret Released in 2000. Socci's "4th Secret" Looking More Plausible. Folks, if Sister Lucy was around in 1969, she would have been able to write her own letters.