Kevin Symonds Admits that Previously Posted Photo of Paul VI and "Sister Lucy" was Doctored. BUT......He also "knows" that there was not any "conspiracy" involved and it is no big deal. MOVE ON.....NOTHING TO SEE HERE.


Since Kevin Symonds refuses to allow me to take any piece of his posts to post on this website --- I will just give you the link to his blog. Clearly faked photos of Paul VI and "Sister Lucy" are no big deal and most certainly not part of any suspicious "conspiracy." The fact that these appeared in official publications and are part of the accepted Sister Lucy biography, is apparently meaningless and of absolutely no concern. That, Mr. Symonds, OR THEY ARE FURTHER EVIDENCE --- just little bits of evidence, of course, --- THAT THE VATICAN HAS PERPETRATED ONE OF THE BIGGEST FRAUDS IN THE HISTORY OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. But of course, since Mr. Symonds is so attached to the men in today's Vatican, he will not lend any support or encouragement to an investigation to prove --- in a scientific way --- that Sister Lucy I and Sister Lucy II were the same person or different people. Clearly Fatima was being USED by the powers that be in 1967 to advance their revolutionary agenda --- now --- endorsed by Our Lady's Messenger. 
Here is the link to Mr. Symonds' "Nothing to See Here" article:
P.S. For the commentators on this blog who have rubbished this entire effort as a huge "money making operation," I can only say that I will PROVE that this calumny is wrong. Why would I risk my immortal soul, destroy my reputation for life, and render a farce one of the major efforts of my life to make an extra $25,000? Every CENT has been spent on the investigation and will continue to be spent on the CONTINUING investigation. Impatience often seems to turn into down right meanness. 

I would like to also ask my readers why the manipulators of Fatima would doctor these photos even though Sister Lucy II was clearly there. This can be seen on the videos that I have published of this event. Ideas?





Comments

  1. They didn’t want to put her front and center, until they were sure the fraud would work. They must have been worried that people who knew her outside the convent might spot the fake. If she wasn’t put front and center, they could still deny it was her, but obviously, no one said anything.

    Or I suppose it is plausible they just wanted better images for their propaganda.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you so much for this work! We have been deceived so much we begin to feel like those dwarfs in Narnia who couldn't hear the truth. If it wasn't that I've followed and appreciated your work so much over the last few years, my initial reaction would have been suspicious of another scam too. God bless you and this effort!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. You the Man. Keep up the good work! Crush the eraser-clapping, front row phoney ball-less katholics. Welcome to the long awaited backlash. Yes BVM we WILL obey.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Have you checked that video? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKtONtLvwvo

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dr. Chojnowski, the reason why there's opposition to your Sr. Lucy investigation? It's because the truth is seen as a threat by some in the Fatima Movements. They obviously want Catholics to remain confused and attached to the Modernist church. What better way to do it than to have everyone believe that heaven's messenger, Sr. Lucy, recognized heretics and apostates as true leaders of the Church? Have you noticed, for instance, the only problem the Fatima Center has ever had with Sr. Lucy II was that she contradicted her earlier position regarding the consecration? They were never concerned about the photographs that showed her warm friendship with the Modernist "popes". That was all fine and dandy. If you wonder why organizations like the Fatima Center won't support this investigation, it's because it could cast doubt on their ludicrous position: that heaven recognizes unrepentant heretics and apostates as leaders of the Church and that heaven is patiently awaiting their consecration.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Original Photo of "the Meeting" between Paul VI and "Sister Lucy" found! TV Camera Stands Next to Paul VI. "Sister Lucy" Cut and Pasted In.

Again Sister Lucy II has to Bi-Locate to Get Near Paul VI during his 1967 Visit to Fatima. As Top Physicians, Plastic Surgeons, Dental Specialists, Private Investigators Analyze and Report about the Photos of "Sister Lucy," More Faked Photos Emerge . As Falling Flowers Used as Confetti Are in Identical Places, "Sister Lucy" Appears and Disappears from 1967 Photos.

Exclusive: RadTrad Thomist has Gotten Access to the Foreward to Fr. Paul Kramer's Soon to be Released "Heretic Pope?" Salza and Siscoe, Fr. Chazal and, yes, even Bishop Williamson Thou Art Refuted! Public Heresy and the Papacy and Even Membership in the Church Cannot Go Together.

Breaking News: Sister Lucy II Did NOT Have Dentures. BUT She DID Seem to Bi-ilocate. See Identical Sister Lucy Picture with DIFFERENT backgrounds! Handwriting Analysis and Height Analysis To be Included in Report.

Best Video footage of the first time the Imposter Sister Lucy was put before the Public on May 13, 1967 and, also, Close-Up Footage of the Imposter Aged 70 or 80.

Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person.

The Secret that Made the Messenger a Refugee and Undesirable. Melanie Calvat's Life of Contradiction and the Message of Punishment and Warning for the World. On this September 19th, Let Us Not Forget the Sorrowful Lady who Spoke of Our Time and of the Time to Come. She told Us "Rome Will Lose the Faith." It has.

Stranger Things: The Unusual Friends of Giovanni Battista Montini --- Isn't it Strange to think that if we did half of what these post-Vatican II popes did, we would ALMOST CERTAINLY GO TO HELL .....No wonder "Sister Lucy" had to be Cut and Pasted into Photos with him in 1967. Read Below Selections from Randy Engels' Article, "Paul VI and the Church's Paradigm Shift on Homosexuality."