Another "Twilight Zone" Photo of "Sister Lucy" with Paul VI on May 13, 1967. He seems to be bending down to listen to her words. She is actually not even present in this scene. My theory is that the Vatican was not confident in the substitution so such close ups were discouraged.



Another Doctored Photo from 1967.

I owe a commentator on Cathoinfo for the first two photos. They are exactly in line with the faked photo I have posted on our last few blog posts. For his post and for the original site see below. A friend and collaborator of Sister Lucy Truth also has a video in which this doctored picture is portrayed on the walls of the Fatima Shrine portraying the life of Sister Lucy.
 
original-photo-of-'the-meeting'-between-paul-vi-and-'sister-lucy'-found!

fatima.htm

If Sister Lucy II was "actually" there --- and why wouldn't she be, it was her first "appearance" --- why would you need doctored photos of the event? Was the Vatican a bit insecure in the apparent fraud at the time and only created "close-ups" of the two together later on when the powers that be decided that the substitution had worked?

P.S., A friend of mine has indicated that he thought the videos of my many lectures and interviews sponsored by the Fatima Center had been taken down. True? 

Here is the apparent source picture for Sister Lucy II of May 13, 1967.




Comments

  1. I really enjoyed your talks too! But I really feel that Father Gruner would be rolling over in his grave if he knew what they were doing over there. You, on the other hand, are doing the work of God. It is very important now more than ever to expose this fraud of the novus ordo once and for all. The church is the immaculate bride of Christ, and the novus ordo is the whore spoken of in the Book of Revelation

    ReplyDelete
  2. I remember watching a talk you gave about Benedict XVI and I can’t find it anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  3. look at her teeth. they dont belong to lucy 1 or lucy 2

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These are entirely normal teeth which neither Lucy I nor Lucy II had!!

      Delete
    2. If that picture was taken in 1967, Sr. Lucy would be 60.
      This woman is not older than 40.

      Delete
  4. I cannot find your talk on the message of La Salette. One of the most powerful talks on the subject! This too was from one of the Fatima conferences.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Announcement 2019: Sworn Declaration from Handwriting Analyst Demonstrates that Sister Lucy II was Imposter. Vatican-Released Third Secret text Proven to be Authentic and Consistent with Memoirs of Sister Lucy I.

The Saint Peter Dossier: Fr. Joseph Poisson Gives RadTrad Thomist an Exclusive Interview Detailing his Years as a Fraternity of Saint Peter Priest. Part I: When the Smoke Cleared.

The Saint Peter Dossier, Part II: When the Bishop Says Jump! A Continuation of Our Exclusive interview with a former FSSP priest.

Photo of the Third Secret Released by the Vatican in 2000. As Far as We are Aware, this Picture has Never been Featured on a English-speaking Website. Submitted to World-Class Analysts. Thank You to All the Generous Donors to Sister Lucy Truth. We have JUST BEGUN.

The Saint Peter Dossier, Part IV: The Fraternity of Saint Peter is Part of Modernism! The Final Installment of RadTrad Thomist's Interview with former FSSP priest Fr. Joseph Poisson.

Fr. Poisson Call Your Office! Fr. David Hewko Gets Ready to Jump Ship in Pfeifferville! Dubious Ambrose Moran Cited as Cause of Upcoming Split

Sister Lucy Truth Expands Into Question of the Authenticity of the Third Secret Released in 2000. Expert Analysts, With No Knowledge of the Text Backstory or Even the Significance of the Writings of Sister Lucy, are Engaged in the Analysis As I Type This.

The Saint Peter Dossier, Part III: Trek Over the Traditional Landscape. Fr. Poisson Tells Of His Exit from the FSSP, His Encounter with the SSPX, and His Settlement in Our Lady of Mount Carmel, Boston, Kentucky.

Vatican Fraud Exposed! Sworn Declaration from Professional Handwriting Analyst that Letter from Sister Lucy II in 1969 Was Written By Imposter and Not By Sister Lucy I. Here is Scientific Evidence that the Sister Lucy II, post-1958 Was a Fraud. Read the 125 page declaration here.