St. Robert Bellarmine Waits for the Remnant to Renounce Writer Who Wrote that Cardinals can Depose and Remove a Pope. I don't think that it is mere coincidence that St. Robert Bellermine's Feast Day is May 13th!


                                       Body of St. Robert Bellarmine, Doctor of the Papacy
                                       That is TEACHER of the Catholic Doctrine of the Papacy
                                       The Papacy Itself Does Not Need a Doctor.
                                       Sorry Chris and John J.D.
     

So we should be able to look to the Pope to find the Catholic Faith....whoa......crazy man!

And then there is the "traditional Catholic" Remnant ---- has the "oldest traditional Catholic newspaper" just gone senile or has it gone Gallican and heretical? Here is the quotation from an article by Elizabeth Yore in which she directly contradicts the above statement by St. Robert Bellermine.  The link to the entire article. Thanks to the Editor of Novus Ordo Watch for coming up with this quotation and a former colleague of mine and good friend Ryan Grant for translating the citation above. Here is the link and the damning statement.

3909-anatomy-of-a-cover-up-an-open-letter-to-pope-francis
The College of Cardinals should immediately convene and remove Francis, the Bishop of Rome for his gross and grave negligence and personal complicity in the systematic flouting and abuse of his own zero tolerance policy causing a scandal of epic proportions brought upon the global Catholic Church and the Chilean Catholic Church. In Francis’ new Motu Proprio Guidelines on Bishop Removal the standard for removal is “In the case of the abuse of minors and vulnerable adults it is enough that the lack of diligence be grave.” § 3. Three years of papal stonewalling and coverup is the definition of grave.
It is easily arguable that the Francis coverup timeline demonstrates overwhelming evidence of a pernicious and wanton breach of ecclesiastic duty to ensure the protection of children and the moral integrity of the episcopacy. For once, will the Princes of the Church protect the little children? Or will they continue to quake in their mitres in the face of the dictator Pope?

Comments

  1. It's spelled Bellarmine. :) Also, do you heavily moderate your combox here? I see very limited comments of late and my own attempts to post any have not been published. Just curious. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, it is no small thing to "make a mistake" on widely publicizing distorted teachings of a Doctor of the Church. I've also noticed these kind of things in the Remnant. Find a phrase and take it out of context but so long as it "proves" what we want it to, then that should be fine. You are better off to go straight to Bellarmine on a good catechism pre-Vatican II. Who wants their "news" or there spin on things if it is going to be like this. Get your act together Remnant. And what about how someone wants to say that you made a mistake in the spelling of Bellarmine, but don't care that the Remnant made a huge mistake in teaching his doctrine. Strain out a gnat and swallow a camel. Don't choke on it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Original Photo of "the Meeting" between Paul VI and "Sister Lucy" found! TV Camera Stands Next to Paul VI. "Sister Lucy" Cut and Pasted In.

Again Sister Lucy II has to Bi-Locate to Get Near Paul VI during his 1967 Visit to Fatima. As Top Physicians, Plastic Surgeons, Dental Specialists, Private Investigators Analyze and Report about the Photos of "Sister Lucy," More Faked Photos Emerge . As Falling Flowers Used as Confetti Are in Identical Places, "Sister Lucy" Appears and Disappears from 1967 Photos.

Exclusive: RadTrad Thomist has Gotten Access to the Foreward to Fr. Paul Kramer's Soon to be Released "Heretic Pope?" Salza and Siscoe, Fr. Chazal and, yes, even Bishop Williamson Thou Art Refuted! Public Heresy and the Papacy and Even Membership in the Church Cannot Go Together.

Best Video footage of the first time the Imposter Sister Lucy was put before the Public on May 13, 1967 and, also, Close-Up Footage of the Imposter Aged 70 or 80.

Kevin Symonds Admits that Previously Posted Photo of Paul VI and "Sister Lucy" was Doctored. BUT......He also "knows" that there was not any "conspiracy" involved and it is no big deal. MOVE ON.....NOTHING TO SEE HERE.

Breaking News: Sister Lucy II Did NOT Have Dentures. BUT She DID Seem to Bi-ilocate. See Identical Sister Lucy Picture with DIFFERENT backgrounds! Handwriting Analysis and Height Analysis To be Included in Report.

Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person.

As World Experts Discuss the Sister Lucy Truth Case, Here is More Proof that the Fatima Establishment Has Used Doctored Photos to Put Forward A Fraud.