"US-Friendly" Contact Within the Vatican Indicated Right After the Death of Pope Pius XII that US Governmental Authorities Must Use the American Cardinals to Prevent the Election of Cardinals Siri, Ottaviani, or Ruffini. The US Government Clearly Saw the Election of a Real Catholic to the Papal Throne in 1958 to be a Threat. Is there No Logical Connection between THIS Telegram and the Strange events of October 26,27, and 28th 1958 within the Sistine Chapel?
Here are the list of the 53 Cardinals who met in Rome for the Conclave in Rome in October 1958. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_electors_for_the_1958_papal_conclave Dr. Chojnowski: This telegraph from Ambassador Zellerbach (US ambassador to Italy) and the Secretary of State of the United States under the Eisenhower administration, John Foster Dulles is a clear path mark indicating to us what we should be looking for as regards the happenings in the 1958 papal conclave that met from October 25-28, exactly 2 weeks after this telegram to the US Secretary of State was written and sent. What do we read in this telegram and why does it matter in our investigation into the fate of Sister Lucy dos Santos of Fatima? We do not, as of yet, have a smoking gun telegram, but this one is clearly a picture of a double-barrel shot gun loaded, locked, safety off, aimed, and finger on the trigger communication. The US government seems an imminent "threat" and it is ready to act --- n
Pedro Manuel Marto no es el padre sino él tío (oncle) de Lucía, esposo de Olimpia dos Santos, hermana de Antonio dos Santos, padre de Lucía dos Santos. No hay parecido con la anciana monja de La foto, ni tiene por qué haberlo.
ReplyDeleteSee https://moimunanblog.com/2018/06/16/misterio-insondable-fotos-de-las-dos-tres-o-cuatro-lucias/
The nun in the top photo is the nun next to Sr Lucia in the bottom photo.
ReplyDeleteGood catch. When I looked at the pics I didn't notice the older nun to the right of the 1967 Sister Lucy. However, I knew immediately it was a misidentification on the part of the newspaper. The nun looks nothing like Sister Lucy and appears much older than 60. Also, the alleged Sister Lucy of 1967 next to her looks much younger than age 60. So neither of them can be the real Sister Lucy.
DeleteHere are some photos of Sr Lucia reportedly from 1948 and 1951.
ReplyDeleteSee link: http://www.maroon.dti.ne.jp/gokyo/diary2013/d-2013-07-03.html
Correction to the above post: 1949 and 1951 are the reported dates not 1948.
ReplyDeleteI think the older nun is also the one on the right in the photo in this link:
ReplyDeletehttps://web.archive.org/web/20081204130535/http://www.santuario-fatima.pt/portal/index.php?id=11682&page=2