Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person.
Sister Lucy I: Missing Sister Lucy II: Impostor I can now release the overall results of the facial recognition tests that have been performed using the most up to date technology available analyzed by the most sophisticated software technicians and organized and analyzed by an expert investigator. "The only thing similar was the habit" were the words I just heard from the investigator in our phone conversation about the result. More specifics on the technicalities of the result will follow this initial announcement. On advice, I will not yet reveal the names of the investigators, the names of the companies involved, or the names of the programs being used. They are the best. They are all working on a comprehensive and definite report on the results and this will be released in the coming weeks. I want to avoid any interference in the investigation. After the final facial recognition report is complete, the second phase of the investigation will be launched whi...

If Chris Ferrara called the impostor Sr. Lucy claim "ludicrous", then there must be two Chris Ferraras. Chris Ferrara #1 said there is a "massive, ongoing, now-in-its-fiftieth-year fraud upon the faithful, a false religion (!!) being masqueraded as the Catholic religion" (Novus Ordo Watch article: "Have the Gates of Hell Prevailed? The Papacy and Sedevacantism", Dec. 27, 2015). If a false religion can be masqueraded as the Catholic religion, then why wouldn't a false Sr. Lucy be possible?
ReplyDeleteThe Gatekeepers. The rewards of this world keep them hewing the Vatican 2 eclipse of the true Faith and they add "resistance" to their deception as a misdirection and to add plausible deniability to the incredible (that means not credible) lies of the robber council. They are against it you see...but not really.
ReplyDelete