Cornelia Ferreira Comes Out Swinging in the Struggle for the Fatima Center

What’s Going on at the Fatima Center?
Cornelia R. Ferreira

On August 28th, aka Catholic published a rather prescient blog on an emerging “new” Fatima Center. In this posting, Louie Verrecchio observed that the Fatima Center (FC) was lessening its fight against errors, especially those concerning the Fatima Message, errors that the FC would have vigorously fought under Father Nicholas Gruner.

In other words, the Fatima Center is moving away from Traditionalism (which abhors error) towards the conservative position (which ignores error so long as it’s mixed with some truth).

Unknown to Louie was that at the precise time of his August 28th post, the new direction was being confirmed in a startling set of letters mailed to American donors from the Fatima Center in Fort Erie, Ontario, the headquarters of Father Nicholas Gruner’s Fatima Apostolate. Note: The above mentioned letters may be read at the following address:
The letters announce a change in the Apostolate’s organizational structure from that set up by Fr. Gruner. On top of that, disturbing accusations against their American co-workers in the letters have shocked and confused readers, who are asking, “What’s going on at the Fatima Center?”

As a long-time associate of Fr. Gruner and the FC, l have been asked if I could shed some light on these letters, which I received from a friend, and which were as much a surprise to me as to their recipients.

I cannot purport to answer the nebulous allegations themselves, nor what triggered their publication; I leave that to the “accused” to address. However, there are errors and inconsistenicies in the letters themselves, to which it is possible to respond.

The Fatima Center is incorporated under the name “The National Committee for the National Pilgrim Virgin of Canada” (NPV). Let’s first consider its letter of August 22nd, signed by mere managers and some Board Directors (incredibly, at least one other Director, Coralie Graham, was kept in the dark about it).

The NPV declares it is “necessary to sever [its] connection” with its sister corporation, Servants of Jesus and Mary (SJM), in Constable, New York, because it is this branch of the Apostolate that is allegedly going in a different direction than that established by Fr. Gruner.

SJM is supposedly “changing the mission of The Fatima Center” by trying to involve it in “several controversial issues within the Church.” Indeed, things are so bad that the FC feels it’s being “sidetracked or prevented from making the ENTIRE Fatima Message understood and followed by EVERYONE.” (The emphasis is theirs.)

Coming from an organization that excitedly praises a Cardinal (Raymond Burke) who is spreading a fake Fatima Message, this is effrontery at its finest.

But, the FC barrels ahead with the vague accusation that the SJM has also recently “begun to make arbitrary decisions that negatively affect the operational effectiveness of the apostolate and hinder us from carrying out our mission.”

Further, it has “pushed for The Fatima Center to change direction and become more radical in its orientation.” (What do they mean by “orientation”? The uncompromising Traditionalism of the old FC, or the conciliatory Conservative-traditionalism being embraced by the new?)

And so, “to preserve Father Gruner’s legacy and the integrity of The Fatima Center’s mission,” says the letter’s signatories, “we find it necessary to sever our connection with SJM.”

To keep the donations flowing, the FC has set up a new American branch, The Fatima Center USA Inc.

With absolutely no details, examples, or evidence provided of the SJM’s wrongdoings, these baseless allegations from the NPV/Fatima Center could certainly be construed as libellous.

And just how scurrilous the allegations are can be seen when one considers the history of SJM and its close working relationship with NPV.

Servants of Jesus and Mary was not set up by Fr. Gruner, nor as merely a mail clearing-house, as the letter from The Fatima Center paints it. Presumably to make the dismissal of SJM seem unimportant, the FC tries to downplay SJM’s importance, claiming it was not involved in the production of literature nor in any decision-making about its own work.

Servants of Jesus and Mary was founded by Fr. Michael Jarecki in the late 70’s as a spiritual organization promoting the message of Fatima. Some years later its members began helping out as volunteers in Fr. Gruner’s apostolate. Even later, under its original name, it began to facilitate the extension of Fr. Gruner’s work into the USA, and it also became involved in the production of literature for the Fatima Center. Both priests worked closely together, with Fr. Gruner being the President of both boards. All major decisions were made by both boards.

Returning to the FC letter, we note a puzzling signature: that of Andrew Cesanek, listed as Vice-President of the FC. But at the time he signed the letter, he was Vice-President of SJM, the same supposedly delinquent organization he was divorcing! How curious that he would tar himself with the same brush.

As to the FC’s claim that “Catholics of good will can disagree” on (undefined) “controversial issues,” it itself seems to display zero tolerance for those who disagree with it or raise uncomfortable topics. Bear in mind that the “new” Center is not focused on correcting errors, and is instead exhibiting a type of Catholic “ecumenism” (which I defined earlier), seeking unity with conservatives.

Could this be why not just the SJM, but the following three individuals “of good will” have also fallen afoul of the Fatima Center?

For instance, Fr. Paul Kramer, President of the SJM Board, had been invited to address the Fatima Conference in California in September, but was very recently dis-invited. Most people know Father is a world-renowned Fatima expert who was a friend and close collaborator of Fr. Gruner since they were seminarians. Father Kramer has been working on the subject of whether Francis is a true Pope, a topic that Fr. Gruner himself raised shortly before his death.

Louie Verrechio, another invited speaker, suffered the same fate shortly after posting my article critical of Cardinal Burke’s Fatima speech at the Rome Life Forum (after the article was turned down by Catholic Family News).

Coralie Graham, who worked side-by-side with Fr. Gruner for over three decades and was editor of The Fatima Crusader for more than a quarter century, was abruptly shown the door a short while ago. Of all Father’s staff, she was probably the closest in thinking to him. She has always insisted on truth and the Catholic duty of correcting error.

Now what is truly mind-boggling is that the letter terminating the Servants of Jesus and Mary was also signed by two managers of the FC. Since when do employees have the power to get rid of a Board of Directors, especially that of another corporation? These managers have certainly built up their own “team” in the letter.

The second letter, from the Advisory Council of Priests, indicates that even these priest advisers have been convinced that it is the managers who are singularly responsible for the apostolate. The priests imply the Fort Erie managers and staff are the only ones trained and trusted by Fr. Gruner to do his work, leading one to unjustly conclude that their American co-workers are not as “good and dedicated” as they.

Interestingly, although the Fatima Center lists five priests on its Advisory Council (as per its Winter 2017 Fatima Center News publication), only three of them signed the letter. Why did the other two not sign?
We await a response from Servants of Jesus and Mary to the letters sent out by The Fatima Center. The scandalous allegations and the questions they raise need to be addressed sooner rather than later, because people around the world are confused and perturbed by this lamentable split in Father Gruner’s apostolate


  1. The whole matter while sad and disheartening is not surprising.

    While Fr. Gruner certainly had good men and women supporting his life's work, he was the "immovable object and the irresistible force" that the Vatican was unable to extinguish. It was just such an instrument that pulled many of us from the stupor of the Vatican II heresies (myself included). I suspect he even changed the hearts of a few willing but timid Bishops----all the while keeping himself as the lightning rod of retribution. Many organizations do not survive the loss of its life long leader particularly when hell is against it. Upon Fr. Gruner's passing I doubted his Apostolate would survive (at least in its current form).

    I found it both intriguing and disheartening (especially while Fr. Gruner was alive) that the Apparitions and Warnings of the BVM (Fatima in particular) were ignored by even a few rad trads as both "private" and unnecessary. I've seen Fr. Gruner implied by these to be either an anachronism or plain misguided. How foolish of any to ignore the last efforts of our God to set us on the path to avoid chastisement. In any event such was the tremendous, daily, uphill battle faced by Fr Gruner. Who exists willing to take his place?


Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Two "Sister Lucys" Standing Side-By Side in 1967? Check out the latest Pictures. Also, I am putting out a call for high-definition Pictures of "Sister Lucy" from any time period of her "life." Please send now. Top Facial Recognition Experts in the Country Are Beginning their Work.

UPDATE; "The Extirpation of the R & R Heresy by the Pastor, Fr. Ringrose" Anti-R&R Headlines Keep Coming out of St. Athanasius Church, Vienna, Virginia

"Ludicrous." Reader Finds Chris Ferrara's Dismissal of the Sister Lucy Truth Investigation. "Surely, the Vatican Would Not be Deceptive.....they just left something out." Join the Tin-Foil Crowd and Find Out What Actually Happened to the Messenger of Our Lady!

"Let's Call this Race: Fr. Chazal is NOT a Sedevacantist," Captain Obvious Reporting! Read his Reasoning Below. Also, My Short Critique of His New Book.

Suarez ex Machina?: How can we defend Catholic Tradition by rejecting the Ancient Teaching of the Church with Regard to Who is in the Catholic Church and Who is Not. Public Heretics are Outside the Church and Cannot Hold Ecclesiastical Office. Here is the Relevant Text from "Heretic Pope?" by Fr. Kramer --- who is not a Sedevacantist, yet is one who Blows the Clear Whistle of Catholic Doctrine on Salza, Siscoe, and, since they have nearly identical positions, Fr. Chazal and Bishop Williamson. Let's Stop trying to Mimic the Gallicans and Find a Real Solution to the Horrible Situation we are In .

Fatima Researcher sends RadTrad Thomist Rarely Seen Pictures of "Sister Lucy" in 1967. I have forwarded these on to the Investigator.

Robert Siscoe Fully Identifies Novus Ordo Modernist church as the Catholic Church. Attacks Bishop Tissier's and Archbishop Lefebvre's Distinction between Catholic Church and Conciliar "Church". Obvious Logical Conclusion: Stick with or Join Again the Novus Ordo Sect and Accept the Idea (Heresy) that the Catholic Church Is both the Church of God and the Church of Heresy AT THE SAME TIME.

Complete Edition of Fr. Paul Kramer's book Heretic Pope? to be Published Soon. Here is a direct link to an Earlier Edition of this Critical and Definitive Refutation of Salza and Siscoe. And Remember, Fr. Nicholas Gruner was Going to be a Co-Author If He had lived to See this Day.