Before the Proof: One Final Consideration of the Case of Sister Lucy

Update: I have been in touch with some professionals with regard to the Sister Lucy investigation. They have promised a thorough and definitive investigation. They also mentioned some of the impressive types of cases that they have been involved with in the past. They were also confident that it can be done. However, such an investigation will be expensive. If you can help in order to launch this professional investigation, please contact me at justicepc@yahoo.com.

I am pursuing the involvement of facial recognition experts in the case of "Sister Lucy." This, I believe will be the most scientific proof that can be offered concerning the identity of the individuals portrayed in the various pictures of "Sister Lucy" barring some kind of DNA testing. I have a hard time believing that the Powers that Be would allow such a DNA test to be done --- it could be done, we think of how the remains of the Russian Imperial Family was tested by testing the DNA of a living relative, namely Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh,

In lieu of this kind of absolute determination, I believe that the pictures of pre and post 1958 "Sister Lucy" can provide the evidence necessary to either prove that they were the same person or to prove that they were not the same person. If it is proven that they are different people, we Catholics and the people of the world, who were meant to be the recipients of the Message, Secrets, and Warnings of Our Lady at Fatima would have to recognize ourselves to be in a bizarre and grave situation. But, then again, doesn't it seem to be bizarre and grave already?

The Common Sense difference between the women who appear in the pre-1958 and the post-1958, actually ---- I have found no picture of "Sister Lucy" post-1958 before the year 1967 when she met with Paul VI for the 50th anniversary celebration of the Fatima apparitions --- suggests an obvious difference between the two women with regard to demeanor, facial structure, teeth, chin, dimples on the cheeks, eye-brows, etc.

As regards to demeanor and characteristic social interaction, her is a commentary by William Walsh concerning his 1946 interview with Sister Lucy as described in his book, Our Lady of Fatima:

“[LĂșcia’s teeth] were large, projecting and irregular, causing the upper lip to protrude and the heavy lower one to hang, while the tip of her snub nose turned up more than ever. Sometimes her swarthy face suggested a nature that could be sullen, stubborn and defiant, if not perverse. But the appearance was deceptive, for under the stimulus of any emotion, the light brown eyes could flash or twinkle, and the little dimples that creased her cheeks when she smiled contributed to an expression quite charming.” (p. 11)
“She seemed uncomfortable at first, and probably was, for she dislikes such interviews intensely, and submits to them only when ordered to do so. She wrung her hands nervously. Her pale brown eyes looked rather guarded and unfriendly. There was not much conviction in the high and timorous voice. A few moments later I had almost forgotten this first impression. She had begun to feel more at ease. She laughed readily; and when she smiled, a little dimple would appear on each cheek. The voice now sounded natural and sincere. There was intelligence in this face, too, and charm. It was impossible not to like her and to trust her.” (p. 218)



WHICH OF THE TWO ABOVE SEEMS TO BE THE WOMAN WHO IS DESCRIBED BY WILLIAM THOMAS WALSH?  ADD TO THIS THE FAMOUS MEETING IN WHICH "SISTER LUCY" HELD THE HAND OF JOHN PAUL II FOR 2 HOURS DURING THEIR MEETING.





Comments

  1. When did real Sister Lucy died? We don't know when. They fooled us.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for examining this. Years ago, when I first saw pictures of the two Sister Lucys, it was absolutely obvious that one was fake. I cannot understand how anyone who looks at these pictures cannot know this!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Here We Go Again: Francis Explicitly Denies What the Church is All About and the Neo-Cons and the Neo-Trads Shout AMBIGUITY!!!!

The Shepherd is Struck and the Sheep Run Towards the Wolf's Lair? Is the Report About the Defection of the General Bursar of the SSPX, Fr. Suarez, True? Does Any One Have More Information About this Report? They Sent a Limousine For Archbishop Lefebvre and He DID NOT Get In. Was a Phone Call From Francis All that Was Necessary?

Frankenmama: The Church on a Journey . When the Harlot of Babylon Jumps on the Backseat of a Motorcycle.

Quote from Archbishop Lefebvre Demonstrates that 40 Years has Changed NOTHING. So Why are We Still Arguing over the Self-Evident. The Long in Construction "Conciliar Church" is NOT the Catholic Church. You Cannot Have the Catholic Church Teaching a False and Modernist Faith. Period.

Francis Renounces Doctrine, Hierarchy, Order, Christ as Light of Truth to the World Through His Apostles, the Charity of Bringing the Faith to Others, and is left with..............Ringing the Salvation Army Bell in front of Wal-Mart?

Who Cares? The Remnant Moderator (Michael Matt?) Excises the Papacy from the "traditional Catholic Religion." Horrible Question to the 20,000 Pilgrims. Who do you see as a Rock of the Catholic Faith? Michael Matt's Remnant or "the Vatican of Pope Francis". Another little question. I thought "Counter-Revolutionaries" were Ultramontanists not Gallicans?

"Am I to stay here alone?" In Light of the Sister Lucy Truth Investigation, these words spoken by Sister Lucy to Our Lady during the June 13th, 1917 Apparition at Fatima are Even More Heart-Rendering. Read Cornelia Ferreira's Latest Fatima Newsletter Here.

...una cum famulo tuo Michahel Matt et Christophorus Ferrara....Isn't it Strange How Francis Could Watch Athanasius Schneider Participate in the Matt/FSSP Catholic Identity Crisis Conference, without Censure or Disciplinary Action, Even Though Matt has Said that the "Remnant" "No longer accepts the Vatican of Pope Francis as a moral authority in ANYTHING." Strange. Just Sayin'

Pentecost 2019: Remembering the Holy Ghost. Guarantor of Infallibility in the Church and Craftsman of Souls.