Before the Proof: One Final Consideration of the Case of Sister Lucy

Update: I have been in touch with some professionals with regard to the Sister Lucy investigation. They have promised a thorough and definitive investigation. They also mentioned some of the impressive types of cases that they have been involved with in the past. They were also confident that it can be done. However, such an investigation will be expensive. If you can help in order to launch this professional investigation, please contact me at justicepc@yahoo.com.

I am pursuing the involvement of facial recognition experts in the case of "Sister Lucy." This, I believe will be the most scientific proof that can be offered concerning the identity of the individuals portrayed in the various pictures of "Sister Lucy" barring some kind of DNA testing. I have a hard time believing that the Powers that Be would allow such a DNA test to be done --- it could be done, we think of how the remains of the Russian Imperial Family was tested by testing the DNA of a living relative, namely Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh,

In lieu of this kind of absolute determination, I believe that the pictures of pre and post 1958 "Sister Lucy" can provide the evidence necessary to either prove that they were the same person or to prove that they were not the same person. If it is proven that they are different people, we Catholics and the people of the world, who were meant to be the recipients of the Message, Secrets, and Warnings of Our Lady at Fatima would have to recognize ourselves to be in a bizarre and grave situation. But, then again, doesn't it seem to be bizarre and grave already?

The Common Sense difference between the women who appear in the pre-1958 and the post-1958, actually ---- I have found no picture of "Sister Lucy" post-1958 before the year 1967 when she met with Paul VI for the 50th anniversary celebration of the Fatima apparitions --- suggests an obvious difference between the two women with regard to demeanor, facial structure, teeth, chin, dimples on the cheeks, eye-brows, etc.

As regards to demeanor and characteristic social interaction, her is a commentary by William Walsh concerning his 1946 interview with Sister Lucy as described in his book, Our Lady of Fatima:

“[LĂșcia’s teeth] were large, projecting and irregular, causing the upper lip to protrude and the heavy lower one to hang, while the tip of her snub nose turned up more than ever. Sometimes her swarthy face suggested a nature that could be sullen, stubborn and defiant, if not perverse. But the appearance was deceptive, for under the stimulus of any emotion, the light brown eyes could flash or twinkle, and the little dimples that creased her cheeks when she smiled contributed to an expression quite charming.” (p. 11)
“She seemed uncomfortable at first, and probably was, for she dislikes such interviews intensely, and submits to them only when ordered to do so. She wrung her hands nervously. Her pale brown eyes looked rather guarded and unfriendly. There was not much conviction in the high and timorous voice. A few moments later I had almost forgotten this first impression. She had begun to feel more at ease. She laughed readily; and when she smiled, a little dimple would appear on each cheek. The voice now sounded natural and sincere. There was intelligence in this face, too, and charm. It was impossible not to like her and to trust her.” (p. 218)



WHICH OF THE TWO ABOVE SEEMS TO BE THE WOMAN WHO IS DESCRIBED BY WILLIAM THOMAS WALSH?  ADD TO THIS THE FAMOUS MEETING IN WHICH "SISTER LUCY" HELD THE HAND OF JOHN PAUL II FOR 2 HOURS DURING THEIR MEETING.





Comments

  1. When did real Sister Lucy died? We don't know when. They fooled us.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for examining this. Years ago, when I first saw pictures of the two Sister Lucys, it was absolutely obvious that one was fake. I cannot understand how anyone who looks at these pictures cannot know this!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Two "Sister Lucys" Standing Side-By Side in 1967? Check out the latest Pictures. Also, I am putting out a call for high-definition Pictures of "Sister Lucy" from any time period of her "life." Please send now. Top Facial Recognition Experts in the Country Are Beginning their Work.

UPDATE; "The Extirpation of the R & R Heresy by the Pastor, Fr. Ringrose" Anti-R&R Headlines Keep Coming out of St. Athanasius Church, Vienna, Virginia

"Ludicrous." Reader Finds Chris Ferrara's Dismissal of the Sister Lucy Truth Investigation. "Surely, the Vatican Would Not be Deceptive.....they just left something out." Join the Tin-Foil Crowd and Find Out What Actually Happened to the Messenger of Our Lady!

"Let's Call this Race: Fr. Chazal is NOT a Sedevacantist," Captain Obvious Reporting! Read his Reasoning Below. Also, My Short Critique of His New Book.

Suarez ex Machina?: How can we defend Catholic Tradition by rejecting the Ancient Teaching of the Church with Regard to Who is in the Catholic Church and Who is Not. Public Heretics are Outside the Church and Cannot Hold Ecclesiastical Office. Here is the Relevant Text from "Heretic Pope?" by Fr. Kramer --- who is not a Sedevacantist, yet is one who Blows the Clear Whistle of Catholic Doctrine on Salza, Siscoe, and, since they have nearly identical positions, Fr. Chazal and Bishop Williamson. Let's Stop trying to Mimic the Gallicans and Find a Real Solution to the Horrible Situation we are In .

Fatima Researcher sends RadTrad Thomist Rarely Seen Pictures of "Sister Lucy" in 1967. I have forwarded these on to the Investigator.

Robert Siscoe Fully Identifies Novus Ordo Modernist church as the Catholic Church. Attacks Bishop Tissier's and Archbishop Lefebvre's Distinction between Catholic Church and Conciliar "Church". Obvious Logical Conclusion: Stick with or Join Again the Novus Ordo Sect and Accept the Idea (Heresy) that the Catholic Church Is both the Church of God and the Church of Heresy AT THE SAME TIME.

Complete Edition of Fr. Paul Kramer's book Heretic Pope? to be Published Soon. Here is a direct link to an Earlier Edition of this Critical and Definitive Refutation of Salza and Siscoe. And Remember, Fr. Nicholas Gruner was Going to be a Co-Author If He had lived to See this Day.